Abstract
Open-ended learning environments afford students opportunities to explore, manipulate, and test concepts, and have the potential to provide students with feedback and support by leveraging the log data generated by them. However, within open-ended contexts, student log data is often noisy and identifying periods of meaningful activity is difficult. This paper introduces a new sequence mining method to overcome this challenge. The Differential Segmentation of Categorical Sequences (DiSCS) algorithm finds segments within a sequence of actions that are maximally or near-maximally different from their immediate neighbors. Segments are then clustered to reveal common periods of student activity. We examine the performance of this method under a variety of conditions to find how well DiSCS can identify where different states of simulated activity start and end. We report that when provided with only the observed actions, DiSCS is able to identify the hidden states of simulated student activity with strong and very strong associations. This strong performance is robust across a variety of contexts including those where observed actions are noisy or common to multiple states. We discuss the implications and limitations of this method for open-ended learning environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Land, S.: Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 48(3), 61–78 (2000)
Hannafin, M., Hill, J., Land, S., Lee, E.: Student-centered, open learning environments: research, theory, and practice. In: Spector, J Michael, Merrill, M David, Elen, Jan, Bishop, M. J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 641–651. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_51
de Jong, T., Linn, M., Zacharia, Z.: Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science 340(6130), 305–308 (2013)
Young, J.: Technology-enhanced mathematics instruction: a second-order meta-analysis of 30 years of research. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 19–33 (2017)
Kolodner, J., et al.: Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design into practice. J. Learn. Sci. 12(4), 495–547 (2003)
Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A., Roehrig, G.: Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In: Engineering in Pre-college Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices, pp. 35–60. Purdue University Press (2014)
Crismond, D., Adams, R.: The informed design teaching and learning matrix. J. Eng. Educ. 101(4), 738–797 (2012)
Purzer, S., Moore, T., Baker, D., Berland, L.: Supporting the implementation of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) through research: engineering (2014)
Wang, H., Moore, T., Roehrig, G., Park, M.: STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. 1(2), 2 (2011)
Gero, J., Tang, H.-H.: The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process. Des. Stud. 22(3), 283–295 (2001)
Chen, H., Cannon, D., Gabrio, J., Leifer, L., Toye, G., Bailey, T.: Using wikis and weblogs to support reflective learning in an introductory engineering design course. Hum. Behav. Des. 5, 95–105 (2005)
Cross, N.: Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In: Eastman, C., Newstatter, W., McCracken, M. (eds.) Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, pp. 79–103. Elsevier, Oxford (2001)
Fischer, C., et al.: Mining big data in education: affordances and challenges. Rev. Res. Educ. 44(1), 130–160 (2020)
Blikstein, P.: Using learning analytics to assess students’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 110–116 (2011)
Gobert, J.D., Sao Pedro, M., Baker, R., Toto, E., Montalvo, O.: Leveraging educational data mining for real-time performance assessment of scientific inquiry skills within microworlds. J. Educ. Data Min. 4(1), 104–143 (2012)
Käser, T., Schwartz, D.L.: Modeling and analyzing inquiry strategies in open-ended learning environments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 30(3), 504–535 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00199-y
Xing, W., et al.: Automatic assessment of students’ engineering design performance using a Bayesian network model. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 59, 230–256 (2020)
Vieira, C., Goldstein, M., Purzer, Ş, Magana, A.: Using learning analytics to characterize student experimentation strategies in the context of engineering design. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 291–317 (2016)
Kinnebrew, J., Loretz, K., Biswas, G.: A contextualized, differential sequence mining method to derive students’ learning behavior patterns. J. Educ. Data Min. 5(1), 190–219 (2013)
Taub, M., Azevedo, R.: Using sequence mining to analyze metacognitive monitoring and scientific inquiry based on levels of efficiency and emotions during game-based learning. J. Educ. Data Min. 10(3), 1–26 (2018)
BogarÃn, A., Cerezo, R., Romero, C.: Survey on educational process mining. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 8(1), e1230 (2018)
Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Data mining in education. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 3(1), 12–27 (2013)
Pelánek, R.: Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: an overview of learner modeling techniques. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 27(3), 313–350 (2017)
Xie, C., Zhang, Z., Nourian, S., Pallant, A., Hazzard, E.: A time series analysis method for assessing engineering design processes using a CAD tool. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 30(1), 218–230 (2014)
Shute, V.: Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Comput. Games Instr. 55(2), 503–524 (2011)
Ayres, J., Flannick, J., Gehrke, J., Yiu, T.: Sequential pattern mining using a bitmap representation. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 429–435 (2002)
Srikant, R., Agrawal, R.: Mining sequential patterns: generalizations and performance improvements. In: Apers, P., Bouzeghoub, M., Gardarin, G. (eds.) EDBT 1996. LNCS, vol. 1057, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0014140
Martinez, R., Yacef, K., Kay, J., Al-Qaraghuli, A., Kharrufa, A.: Analysing frequent sequential patterns of collaborative learning activity around an interactive tabletop. In: 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 111–120 (2011)
Bannert, M., Reimann, P., Sonnenberg, C.: Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacogn. Learn. 9(2), 161–185 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6
Bouchet, F., Harley, J., Trevors, G., Azevedo, R.: Clustering and profiling students according to their interactions with an intelligent tutoring system fostering self-regulated learning. J. Educ. Data Min. 5(1), 104–146 (2013)
DeFalco, J., et al.: Detecting and addressing frustration in a serious game for military training. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 28(2), 152–193 (2018)
DiSCS code repository. https://github.com/jpbywater/DiSCS
Rousseeuw, P.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)
Xie, C., Schimpf, C., Chao, J., Nourian, S., Massicotte, J.: Learning and teaching engineering design through modeling and simulation on a CAD platform. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 26(4), 824–840 (2018)
Cramer, H.: Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1946)
Rea, L., Parker, R.: Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2014)
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (NSF DRL-1503170). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bywater, J.P., Floryan, M., Chiu, J.L. (2021). DiSCS: A New Sequence Segmentation Method for Open-Ended Learning Environments. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78291-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78292-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)