Abstract
In order to deal with increasingly complex manufacturing systems, we need to make sophisticated decisions. A new challenge emerges when dealing with presenting a new decision – making model merged by an off-line (production data including; staffs, machinery, materials) and on-line (sensors, actuators) data to render a shared responsibility of decision´s consequences between machine and human through giving weight to the taken decisions. Undoubtedly, to make an accurate fair prediction, this presented model should follow the ethical rules. However, the mostly past research works about relationship between machine and ethics mainly have focused on human and his responsibility in applying of technology and only humans have engaged in ethical issues. In light of the digital era especially applying AI and Machine learning, necessarily a new approach should be applied to the interplay between the machine, ethics, and human by adding an ethical dimension to those machines which involve with decision making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lumbreras, S.: The Limits of Machine Ethics, Institute for Research in Technology, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid 28001, Spain
Veruggio, G., Operto, F., Bekey, G.: Roboethics: social and ethical implications. In: Siciliano, B., Khatib, O. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Robotics, pp. 2135–2160. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_80
Fletcher, S.R., Webb, P.: Industrial robot ethics: the challenges of closer human collaboration in future manufacturing systems. In: Ferreira, M.I.A., J., Silva Sequeira, Tokhi, M.O., Kadar, E.E., Virk, G.S. (eds.) A World with Robots. ISCASE, vol. 84, pp. 159–169. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_12
Shi, Y., Sun, C., Li, Q., Cui, L., Yu, H., Miao, C.: A fraud resilient medical insurance claim system. In: AAAI, pp. 4393–4394 (2016)
Zheng, Y., Yu, H., Cui, L., Miao, C., Leung, C., Yang, Q.: Smarths: An ai platform
Alaieri, F., Vellino, A.: Ethical decision making in robots: autonomy, trust and responsibility. In: Agah, A ., Cabibihan, J.J., Howard A.M., Salichs, M.A., He, H., (eds.) Social Robotics: 8th International Conference, ICSR 2016, Kansas City, MO, USA, November 1-3, 2016 Proceedings Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 9979 Springer International Publishing Cham 159 168 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3
Millar, J.: An ethics evaluation tool for automating ethical decision-making in robots and self-driving cars, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Appl. Artif. Intell. 30(8), 787–809 (2016)
J., Torresen: A review of future and ethical perspectives of robotics and AI. Front. Robot. AI 4, 75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00075
Luxton, D.D.: Recommendations for the ethical use and design of artificial intelligent care providers. Artif. Intell. Med. 62(1), 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2014.06.004
Tonkens, R.: A challenge for machine ethics. Minds Mach. 19(3), 421–438 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-009-9159-1
Robinson, S., et al.: Modelling and improving human decision making with simulation. In: Peters, B.A., Smith, J.S., Medeiros, D.J., Rohrer, M.W., (eds.) Winter Simulation Conference (2001)
Rizun, N., Taranenko, Y.: Simulation models of human decision-making processes. Manage. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 2(2), 241–264 (2014)
Kim, N., Joo, J., Rothrock, L., Wysk, R., Son, Young-Jun.: Human behavioral simulation using affordance-based agent model. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6761, pp. 368–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21602-2_40
Zülch, G., Modelling and Simulation of Human Decision-Making in Manufacturing Systems. 1-4244-0501-7/06/. IEEE (2006)
Lin, T.: Modelling of Human Decision Making via Direct and Optimization-based Methods for Semi-Autonomous Systems. University of California, Berkeley (2015)
Aerts, D., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., Veloz, T.: Modeling Human Decision-making: An Overview of the Brussels Quantum Approach (2018). arXiv:1807.11036v1 [q-bio.NC]
Szipka, K.: Modelling and Management of Uncertainty in Production Systems - from Measurement to Decision. KTH Royal Institute of Technology Department of Production Engineering Manufacturing and Metrology Systems (2018)
Hoc, J.M.: From human – machine interaction to human – machine cooperation. Ergonomics 43(7), 833–843 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409044
Beer, J.M., Fisk, A.D., Rogers, W.A.: Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction. J. Hum. Robot. Interact. 3(2), 74 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5898/JHRI.3.2.Beer
Kavathatzopoulos, I., Asai, R.: Can machines make ethical decisions? In: Papadopoulos, H., Andreou, A.S., Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I. (eds.) AIAI 2013. IAICT, vol. 412, pp. 693–699. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41142-7_70
Tolmeijer, S., Kneer, M., Sarasua, C., Christen, M., Bernstein, A.: Implementations in machine ethics: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 53(6), 1–38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3419633
Anderson, S.L., Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Machine metaethics. In: Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L. (eds.) Machine Ethics, pp. 21–27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.004
Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Guest editors’ introduction: machine ethics. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 10–11 (2006)
Allen, C., Smit, I., Wallach, W.: Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inf. Technol. 7(3), 149–155 (2005)
Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent. AI Mag. 28(4), 15–26 (2007)
Mittelstadti, B.: AI ethics – too principled to fail?
Picard, R.W., et al.: Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Sparrow, R.: Killer robots. J. Appl. Philos. 24(1), 62–77 (2007)
Taddeo, M., Floridi, L.: How AI can be a force for good. Science 361(6404), 751–752 (2018)
Millar, J.: Technology as moral proxy: autonomy and paternalism by design. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 34(2), 47–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2015.2425612
Santis, A., Siciliano, B.: Safety issues for human–robot cooperation in manufacturing systems. Tools and Perspectives in Virtual Manufacturing (2008)
Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Sixteen Challenges and Opportunities, Brian Patrick Green, director of Technology Ethics at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics
Asaro, P.: Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Rome, Italy (2007)
Johnson, D.G.: Computer systems: moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics Inf. Technol. 8(4), 195–204 (2006)
Dodig-Crnkovic, G., Persson, D.: Sharing moral responsibility with robots: a pragmatic approach. In: Tenth Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, SCAI 2008, pp. 165–168 (2008)
Jarvik, M.: How to understand moral responsibility? TRAMES. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 7(3), 147–163 (2003)
Acknowledgements
This work benefited from partial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia through the program UIDB/00066/2020 (CTS – Center of Technology and Systems).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kondori, E., Neves-Silva, R. (2021). A New Challenge for Machine Ethics Regarding Decision-Making in Manufacturing Systems. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Ferreira, P., Brito, G. (eds) Technological Innovation for Applied AI Systems. DoCEIS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 626. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78287-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78288-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)