Skip to main content

Classification of Verbs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Function and Class in Linguistic Description
  • 176 Accesses

Abstract

Among other possible criteria, verbs are classified according to their valency. This is recognized in traditional grammar, which refers to verbs as transitive, intransitive, copulative, and so on. But the complexity is much greater, if we consider the great number of different constructions in which each verb can occur. In this chapter several classification criteria of verbs are discussed and exemplified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This statement must be qualified for the case of the participle. But there is evidence that the so-called participle in Portuguese in fact corresponds to two forms, only one of them belonging to the verb lexeme, sharing its valential properties, the other being a derived item that does not belong to the verb lexeme (see Perini 2015, Appendix 6).

  2. 2.

    These categories are from Levin (1993).

  3. 3.

    ‘αRef’ in the Valency dictionary. Thematic relations like this are said to be paired.

  4. 4.

    Be is a pretty complex verb, and can evoke other schemas, which do not concern us here.

  5. 5.

    They differ as to which is the topic, but this is not a valential matter. Meaning has several layers, as is known.

  6. 6.

    That is, it does not have [+R] in its functional potential—except in a few cases where this is stipulated in the diathesis of the verb.

  7. 7.

    This role occurs, often with syntactic differences, in the valency of several verbs, for example, virar ‘become’, (se) converter ‘id.’, reduzir ‘reduce’, transformar ‘turn (into)’, and others.

  8. 8.

    I disregard here the possibility of syntactic prototype rules, which are perfectly possible—in particular for such a widespread syntactic configuration as [6].

  9. 9.

    In English some items, like ought, are always auxiliaries; Portuguese auxiliaries all have other functions.

  10. 10.

    Not just “participle”. Portuguese has two participles, the verbal and the nominal one; the former occurs with auxiliaries, the latter patterns somewhat like an adjective; see Perini (2013, 2015, Appendix 6).

  11. 11.

    See a complete list, and an excellent study, in Pontes (1973).

  12. 12.

    Not a very good designation, since the construction itself is not light, but it will do for the moment.

  13. 13.

    A basic text on light constructions in Portuguese is Scher (2003); I develop her ideas in Perini (2015, section 6.5).

References

  • Borba, Francisco da Silva.1990. Dicionário gramatical de verbos do português contemporâneo do Brasil [Grammatical dictionary of verbs of contemporary Brazilian Portuguese]. São Paulo: Ed. UNESP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cançado, Márcia, Luísa Godoy, and Luana Amaral. 2013. Catálogo de verbos do português brasileiro [Catalogue of verbs of Brazilian Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, Janayna M.R. 2012. Valência dos verbos de conhecimento do português brasileiro [Valency of verbs of knowledge in Brazilian Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte: M.A. dissertation, UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations—A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perini, Mário A. 2013. Os dois particípios e a análise das passivas no português brasileiro [The two participles and the analysis of passives in Brazilian Portuguese]. In A gramática da oração: diferentes olhares [Grammar of the clause: Several views], ed. Maria Angélica F. Cunha, 68–84. Natal, RN: EDUFRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Describing verb valency: Practical and theoretical issues. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pontes, Eunice. 1973. Verbos auxiliares em português [Auxiliary verbs in Portuguese]. Petrópolis: Vozes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scher, Ana Paula. 2003. Quais são as propriedades lexicais de uma construção com verbo leve? [What are the lexical properties of a light-verb construction?] In Semântica formal [Formal semantics], ed. Ana Lúcia Müller, Esmeralda V. Negrão, and Maria José Foltran. São Paulo: Ed. Contexto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trask, R.L. 1992. A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Perini, M.A. (2021). Classification of Verbs. In: Function and Class in Linguistic Description. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78173-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78173-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78172-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78173-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics