Abstract
Our research aims to analyze the role of trust in partnerships of academic inventors that developed patented inventions. We studied the influence of similarity in the area of research, reciprocal communication, decision process similarity, team size, contact frequency, and relationship maturity in trust building. We used a mixed method approach to data collection: questionnaire and interview. We observed that patents developed in partnership are still a minority: from the 104 analyzed patents, only 37 were developed in partnership: 18 University-Industry partnerships and 19 Academic partnerships. Partnerships are mostly national. We conclude that decision process similarity and contact frequency are significant for building trust within a partnership. Academic inventors with extensive experience in patenting and in patent commercialization stressed that University-Industry partnerships are important for a better co-development of patents with a focus on the market.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D’Este, P., Patel, P.: University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Res. Policy 36(9), 1295–1313 (2007)
Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from National systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university–industry– government relations. Res. Policy 29(2), 109–123 (2000)
Perkmann, M., et al.: Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2), 423–442 (2013)
Hermans, J., Castiaux, A.: Contingent knowledge transfers in university–industry R&D projects. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 15(1), 68–77 (2017)
Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J.C.: Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Res. Policy 34, 932–950 (2005)
Campbell, T.I.D., Slaughter, S.: Faculty and administrators’ attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. J. Higher Educ. 70, 309–352 (1999)
Ponomariov, B., Boardman, P.C.: The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. J. Technol. Transfer 33, 301–313 (2008)
Abrams, L.C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., Levin, D.Z.: Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Acad. Manag. Exec. 17(4), 64–77 (2003)
Seppanen, R., Blomqvist, K., Sundqvist, S.: Measuring inter-organizational trust—a critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003. Ind. Mark. Manage. 36, 249–265 (2007)
Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M., Barczak, G.: The changing bases of mutual trust formation in inter-organizational relationships: A dyadic study of university-industry research collaborations. J. Bus. Res. 74, 47–54 (2017)
Boardman, P.C.: Beyond the stars: The impact of affiliation with university biotechnology centers on the industrial involvement of university scientists. Technovation 28, 291–297 (2008)
Grimpe, C., Fier, H.: Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. J. Technol. Transfer 35, 637–650 (2010)
Haeussler, C., Colyvas, J.A.: Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Res. Policy 40(1), 41–54 (2011)
Schilke, O., Cook, K.S.: A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strateg. Organ. 11(3), 281–303 (2013)
Vanneste, B.S., Puranam, P., Kretschmer, T.: Trust over time in exchange relationships: meta-analysis and theory. Strateg. Manag. J. 35(12), 1891–1902 (2014)
Daniel, A.D., Alves, L.: University-industry technology transfer: the commercialization of university’s patents. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 18(3), 276–296 (2020)
Colquitt, J.A., Lepine, J.A., Zapata, C.P., Wild, R.E.: Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Acad. Manag. J. 54(5), 999–1015 (2011)
Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709–734 (1995)
Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 393–404 (1998)
De. Jong, B.A., Elfring, T.: How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediationg role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Acad. Manag. J. 53(3), 535–549 (2010)
Coote, L., Forrest, E.J., Tam, T.W.: An investigation into commitment in non-Western industrial marketing relationships. Ind. Mark. Manage. 32(7), 595–604 (2003)
Dirks, K.T., Ferrin, D.L.: Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 611–628 (2002)
Schaubroeck, J.M., Peng, A.C., Hannah, S.T.: Developing trust with peers and leaders: impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Acad. Manag. J. 56(4), 1148–1168 (2013)
Das, T.K., Teng, B.S.: Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework. Organ. Stud. 22, 251–283 (2001)
RodrÃguez-Pose, A., von Berlepsch, V.: Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. J. Happiness Stud. 15(2), 357–386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y
Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., Seppanen, R.: Playing the collaboration game right-balancing trust and contracting. Technovation 25, 497–504 (2005)
Chua, R.Y.J., Ingram, P., Morris, M.W.: From the head and the heart: locating cognition- and affect- based trust in managers’ professional networks. Acad. Manag. J. 51(3), 436–452 (2008)
Creswell, J.W., Plano, C.V.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007)
Miles, M., Huberman, A.: An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis California. Sage Publications, Estados Unidos da América (1994)
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N.: Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 14(1), 111–133 (2003)
Noblet, J.P., Simon, E., Parent, R.: Absorptive capacity: a proposed operationalization. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 9(4), 367–377 (2011)
Valkokari, K., Passi, J., Rantala, T.: Managing knowledge within networked innovation. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 10(1), 27–40 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Alves, L., Daniel, A.D. (2022). University-Industry Partnerships in the Development of the Academic Patents: Factors for Building Trust. In: Machado, J., Soares, F., Trojanowska, J., Ivanov, V. (eds) Innovations in Industrial Engineering. icieng 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78169-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78170-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)