Skip to main content

University-Industry Partnerships in the Development of the Academic Patents: Factors for Building Trust

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations in Industrial Engineering (icieng 2021)

Abstract

Our research aims to analyze the role of trust in partnerships of academic inventors that developed patented inventions. We studied the influence of similarity in the area of research, reciprocal communication, decision process similarity, team size, contact frequency, and relationship maturity in trust building. We used a mixed method approach to data collection: questionnaire and interview. We observed that patents developed in partnership are still a minority: from the 104 analyzed patents, only 37 were developed in partnership: 18 University-Industry partnerships and 19 Academic partnerships. Partnerships are mostly national. We conclude that decision process similarity and contact frequency are significant for building trust within a partnership. Academic inventors with extensive experience in patenting and in patent commercialization stressed that University-Industry partnerships are important for a better co-development of patents with a focus on the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D’Este, P., Patel, P.: University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Res. Policy 36(9), 1295–1313 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L.: The dynamics of innovation: from National systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university–industry– government relations. Res. Policy 29(2), 109–123 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perkmann, M., et al.: Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Res. Policy 42(2), 423–442 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hermans, J., Castiaux, A.: Contingent knowledge transfers in university–industry R&D projects. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 15(1), 68–77 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J.C.: Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Res. Policy 34, 932–950 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, T.I.D., Slaughter, S.: Faculty and administrators’ attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. J. Higher Educ. 70, 309–352 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ponomariov, B., Boardman, P.C.: The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. J. Technol. Transfer 33, 301–313 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams, L.C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., Levin, D.Z.: Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Acad. Manag. Exec. 17(4), 64–77 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seppanen, R., Blomqvist, K., Sundqvist, S.: Measuring inter-organizational trust—a critical review of the empirical research in 1990–2003. Ind. Mark. Manage. 36, 249–265 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M., Barczak, G.: The changing bases of mutual trust formation in inter-organizational relationships: A dyadic study of university-industry research collaborations. J. Bus. Res. 74, 47–54 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boardman, P.C.: Beyond the stars: The impact of affiliation with university biotechnology centers on the industrial involvement of university scientists. Technovation 28, 291–297 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grimpe, C., Fier, H.: Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany. J. Technol. Transfer 35, 637–650 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haeussler, C., Colyvas, J.A.: Breaking the ivory tower: academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Res. Policy 40(1), 41–54 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schilke, O., Cook, K.S.: A cross-level process theory of trust development in interorganizational relationships. Strateg. Organ. 11(3), 281–303 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanneste, B.S., Puranam, P., Kretschmer, T.: Trust over time in exchange relationships: meta-analysis and theory. Strateg. Manag. J. 35(12), 1891–1902 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniel, A.D., Alves, L.: University-industry technology transfer: the commercialization of university’s patents. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 18(3), 276–296 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Colquitt, J.A., Lepine, J.A., Zapata, C.P., Wild, R.E.: Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Acad. Manag. J. 54(5), 999–1015 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C.: Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 393–404 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De. Jong, B.A., Elfring, T.: How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediationg role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Acad. Manag. J. 53(3), 535–549 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Coote, L., Forrest, E.J., Tam, T.W.: An investigation into commitment in non-Western industrial marketing relationships. Ind. Mark. Manage. 32(7), 595–604 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dirks, K.T., Ferrin, D.L.: Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 611–628 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaubroeck, J.M., Peng, A.C., Hannah, S.T.: Developing trust with peers and leaders: impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Acad. Manag. J. 56(4), 1148–1168 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Das, T.K., Teng, B.S.: Trust, control and risk in strategic alliances: an integrated framework. Organ. Stud. 22, 251–283 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rodríguez-Pose, A., von Berlepsch, V.: Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. J. Happiness Stud. 15(2), 357–386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9426-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna, P., Seppanen, R.: Playing the collaboration game right-balancing trust and contracting. Technovation 25, 497–504 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chua, R.Y.J., Ingram, P., Morris, M.W.: From the head and the heart: locating cognition- and affect- based trust in managers’ professional networks. Acad. Manag. J. 51(3), 436–452 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Creswell, J.W., Plano, C.V.: Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 1(2), 112–133 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Miles, M., Huberman, A.: An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis California. Sage Publications, Estados Unidos da América (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N.: Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 14(1), 111–133 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Noblet, J.P., Simon, E., Parent, R.: Absorptive capacity: a proposed operationalization. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 9(4), 367–377 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Valkokari, K., Passi, J., Rantala, T.: Managing knowledge within networked innovation. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 10(1), 27–40 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Alves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alves, L., Daniel, A.D. (2022). University-Industry Partnerships in the Development of the Academic Patents: Factors for Building Trust. In: Machado, J., Soares, F., Trojanowska, J., Ivanov, V. (eds) Innovations in Industrial Engineering. icieng 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78170-5_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78169-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78170-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics