Skip to main content

3D Documentation of Stone Sites at Ilulissat, West Greenland

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Cultural Computing ((SSCC))

Abstract

In this chapter, we show how Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry and Computed Tomography (CT) scanning were implemented for documenting and interpreting graves and human remains, which were excavated in Greenland during the summers of 2018 and 2019. The burial sites are characterised by isolated stone graves that were built with either single or multiple chambers. Both single- and multi-individual graves were discovered. Photogrammetric documentation as well as traditional sketches of the graves were performed during each excavation phase. Here, we discuss how these two approaches correlate and complement each other, including highlighting the advantages and drawbacks of each method. We also show how 3D models of the human remains from CT scanning and 3D models of a grave obtained from SfM photogrammetry were combined and used to give an illustrative and more comprehensive view of the stone-built features, as well as to assist in the overall interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • 3D flow www.3dflow.net. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Agisoft. www.agisoft.com/. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Agugiaro G (2014) 2D GIS vs. 3D GIS theory. In: Remondino F, Campana S (eds) 3D recording and modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage, vol BAR international series 2598. British archaeological reports, pp 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens S, Borvik R (2016) Measurement and mapping of ship finds based on 2D and close range photogrammetry techniques. In: Garhøj N, Pilati M (eds) Why 3D? Challenage and solutions with the use of 3D visualization in archaelogy. Lasertryk A/S, Denmark, pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Alqahtani SJ, Liversidge HM, Hector MP (2010) Atlas of tooth development and eruption. Am J Phys Anthropol 54–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier W, Rando C (2016) Developing the use of structure-from-motion in mass grave documentation. Forensic Sci Int 261:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett RG, Conlogue GJ (2009) Paleoimaging: field applications for cultural remains and artifacts. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet R (2014) Airborne laser scanning for archeological prospection. In Remondino F, Campana S (eds) 3D recording and modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage, vol BAR international series 2598. British archaeological reports, pp 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Capturing Reality. www.capturingreality.com/. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • CCWU. www.ccwu.me/vsfm/. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Ch'ng E, Gaffney V (2013) Seeing things: heritage computing, visualisation and the arts and humanities. In: Ch'ng E, Gaffney V, Chapman H (eds) Visual heritage in the digital age, vol Springer series on cultural computing. Springer, London, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhem RK, Brothwell DR (2008) Paleoradiology. Imaging mummies and fossils. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud Compare. www.cloudcompare.org. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Corel Draw. www.coreldraw.com. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Dell'Unto N (2014) The use of 3D models for intra-site investigation in archaeology. In: 3D recording and modeling in archaeology and cultural heritage: theory and best practices—theory and best practices. BAR international series. Archaeopress, pp 151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Digitised Diseases. www.digitiseddiseases.org. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Eriksen AM, Gregory DJ, Villa C, Lynnerup N, Botfeldt KB, Rasmussen AR (2016) The effects of wood anisotropy on the mode of attack by the woodborer Teredo navalis and the implications for underwater cultural heritage. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 107:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber E, Sparrow T, Murgatroyd A, Wilson AS, Gaffney V, Gaffney C (2017) Special report curious travellers: preserving endangered heritage across the world. Curr. World Archaeol. 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney V, Bates R, Ch’ng E, Cuttler R, Gaffney C, Wilson A (2016) BradPhys to BradViz or from archaeological science to heritage science. Paper presented at the 22nd international conference on virtual system & multimedia (VSMM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galiatzatos N (2014) Exploring archaelogical landscapes with satellite imagery. In: Remondino F, Campana S (eds) 3D recording and modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage. Vol BAR international series 2598. British archaeological reports, pp 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimp. www.gimp.org. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • github.com/steve-vincent/photogrammetry. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Goldman LW (2008) Principles of CT: multislice CT. J Nucl Med Technol 36(2):57–68. quiz 75–56 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.107.044826.

  • Guidi G (2014) Terrestrial optical active sensors—theory & applications. In: Remondino F, Campana S (eds) 3D recording and modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage, vol BAR international series 2598. British archaeological reports, pp 39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassani F (2015) Documentation of cultural heritage techniques, potentials and constraints. In: 25th international Cipa symposium 2015, 40-5(W7), pp 207–214. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W7-207-2015

  • Historic_England (2017) Photogrammetric applications for cultural heritage. Guidance for good practice. Historic England, Swindon

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalender WA (2011) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications, 3rd edn. Publicis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus K (1994) Photogrammetry, vol Bonn. Verd. Dümmler Verlag, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucukkaya AG (2004) Photogrammetry and remote sensing in archeology. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 88(1–3):83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2003.12.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limaverde S, Pêgas RV, Damasceno R, Villa C, Oliveira G, Bonde N et al (2018) Interpreting character variation in turtles: Araripemys barretoi (Pleurodira: Pelomedusoides) from the Araripe Basin, Early Cretaceous of Northeastern Brazil. PeerJ PrePrints 6:e27262v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27262v1

  • Luhmann T, Robson S, Kyle S, Boehm J (2013) Close-range photogrammetry and 3D imaging. Walter de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynnerup N (2007) Mummies. Yearb Phys Anthropol 50(50):162–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mimics. www.materialise.com/en/medical/software/mimics. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Myrian. www.intrasense.fr. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Nguyen CV, Lovell DR, Adcock M, La Salle J (2014) Capturing natural-colour 3D models of insects for species discovery and diagnostics. PLoS One 9(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Osirix Viewer. www.osirix-viewer.com. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Photomodeler. www.photomodeler.com Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Poulsen K, Simonsen J (2007) Computed tomography as routine in connection with medico-legal autopsies. Forensic Sci Int 171(2–3):190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutty GN, Morgan B, O’Donnell C, Leth PM, Thali M (2008) Forensic institutes across the world place CT or MRI scanners or both into their mortuaries. J Trauma-Inj Infect Crit Care 65(2):493–494. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31817de420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheuer L, Black SMD (2000) Developmental juvenile osteology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert JA (2004) X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: basic principles of x-ray production. J Nucl Med Technol 32(3):139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibert JA, Boone JM (2005) X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 2: X-ray interactions and image formation. J Nucl Med Technol 33(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebke I, Campana L, Ramstein M, Furtwängler A, Hafner A, Lösch S (2018) The application of different 3D-scan-systems and photogrammetry at an excavation—A Neolithic dolmen from Switzerland. Digit Appl Archaeol Cult Herit 10:e00078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2018.e00078

  • Slicer. www.slicer.org. Accessed 4 Aug 2020

  • Themistocleous K, Mettas C, Evagorou E, Hadjimitsis D (2019) The use of UAVs and photogrammetry for the documentation of cultural heritage monuments: the case study of the churches in Cyprus. Earth Resour Environ Remote Sens Gis Appl X:11156. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2533056

  • Tobiasz A, Markiewicz J, Lapinski S, Nikel J, Kot P, Muradov M (2019) Review of methods for documentation, management, and sustainability of cultural heritage. Case study: museum of King Jan III's Palace at Wilanow. Sustainability 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247046

  • Ubelaker DH (1989) Human skeletal remains: excavation, analysis, interpretation. Manuals on archeology, vol 2. Taraxacum, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa C (2017) Forensic 3D documentation of skin injuries. Int J Legal Med 131(3):751–759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1499-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa C, Flies MJ, Jacobsen C (2018) Forensic 3D documentation of bodies: simple and fast procedure for combining CT scanning with external photogrammetry data. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 12:e2–e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa C, Frohlich B, Lynnerup N (2019) Chapter 7 - The Role of Imaging in Paleopathology. In: Buikstra JE (ed) Ortner’s identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 169–182

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Villa C, Jacobsen C (2019) The application of photogrammetry for forensic 3D recording of crime scenes, evidence and people. In: Rutty G (ed) Essentials of autopsy practice. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Villa C, Lynnerup N (2012) Hounsfield units ranges in CT-scans of bog bodies and mummies. Anthropol Anz 69(2):127–145. https://doi.org/10.1127/0003-5548/2012/0139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron T (2009) Palaeopathology. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Villa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Villa, C., Jørkov, M.L., Madsen, C.K., Jensen, J.F. (2022). 3D Documentation of Stone Sites at Ilulissat, West Greenland. In: Ch'ng, E., Chapman, H., Gaffney, V., Wilson, A.S. (eds) Visual Heritage: Digital Approaches in Heritage Science. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77028-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77028-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77027-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77028-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics