Abstract
The paper aims to develop proposals for the formation of an effective infrastructure of state support for the development of smart technology (based on the analysis of the innovation infrastructure of the Krasnoyarsk Territory). The authors analyze the role of the innovation infrastructure of the Krasnoyarsk Territory in supporting smart technology based on the concepts of “triple” and “quadruple” helices of innovation activity. The authors note the contradiction between the high interest of regional authorities in developing this sphere and the small number and insufficient quality of scientific projects in the relevant priority areas. The proposed steps to resolve this contradiction are based on the provisions of the concept of smart specialization of regions. In the Krasnoyarsk Territory, there are functioning basic elements of innovation infrastructure, an established regulatory framework, and adequate support measures for the development of smart technology. Based on the analysis of the elements of innovation infrastructure of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, the authors reveal several problems hindering the development of smart technology, including (1) the lack of qualified personnel, (2) insufficient level of interaction between the elements of innovation infrastructure of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, and (3) the lack of a systematic approach from the stakeholders. The authors propose several steps to solve these problems: (1) creation of an integrated system for the development of smart technology; (2) creation of a unified model of interaction between all elements of the innovation infrastructure; (3) development of a system of measures to attract highly qualified personnel in the field of smart technology to the Krasnoyarsk Territory; (4) targeted fundraising projects; (5) inter-regional comparisons in forming regional priorities based on the model of smart specialization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Benneworth P, Schulze-Greiving V, Konrad K (2019) Knowledge bases and responsibility within regional innovation systems: reflections from the Twente region. Eur Plan Stud 27(12):2491–2509
Bogdanova OV (2018) The current level of innovative development of the economy of Russia and the Tver region. Econ Res 2:4–17
Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2010) Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, and Quintuple Helix, and how do knowledge, innovation, and the environment relate to each other? A proposed framework for a transdisciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. Int J Soc Ecol Sustain Dev 1(1):41–69
Carayannis E, Grigoroudis E (2016) Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight STI Governance 10(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2016.1.31.42
Dabinett G (2014) A new strategic approach to science cities: towards the achievement of sustainable and balanced spatial development. In Oh DS, Phillips F (eds) Technopolis. Springer, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5508-9_1
Dvinsky MB, Drobyshev IA, Nepomnyaschaya NV, Pavluchenko TV (2017) Smart city. “Smart” infrastructure, networks, and communications. J Siberian Fed Univ Humanit Soc Sci 10(12):1869–1875
Etzkowitz H (2002) The Triple Helix of university-industry-government: Implications for policy and evaluation. Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research, Stockholm, Sweden
Golova IM, Suhovej AF (2019) Differentiation of innovative development strategies taking into account the specifics of Russian regions. Econ Reg 15(4):1294–1308
Hassink R, Berg S-H (2014) Smart industries from an evolutionary perspective: a critical literature review. Geogr Compass 8(9):653–664
Ivanilova TN, Prokopenko SV, Popov AA, Demidyuk VD, Buslov IA, Subocheva SA (2019) Project design portal teleservicing neurorehabilitation “Neyrodom.” Inf Technol Phys 1:73–80
Kashnikova TV (2013) Trends and tools development the innovation of small businesses in the region (on the example of the Rostov Reg). Terra Econ 11(2):72–75
Legislative Assembly of the Krasnoyarsk Territory (2009). Resolution of the Legislative Assembly of the Krasnoyarsk Territory “On the approval of priority directions of state support for scientific, scientific and technical, and innovative activities in the Krasnoyarsk Territory (July 7, 2009 No. 8–3635П). Krasnoyarsk, Russia: Garant. Retrieved from https://base.garant.ru/18543579.
Legislative Assembly of the Krasnoyarsk Territory (2011). Law of the Krasnoyarsk Territory “On scientific, scientific and technical, and innovative activities in the Krasnoyarsk Territory” (December 1, 2011 No. 13–6629). Krasnoyarsk, Russia: Garant. Retrieved from https://base.garant.ru/18619472/
Leydesdorff L (2000) The Triple Helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Res Policy 29:243–255
Maglinets YA, Raevich KV, Tsibulskii GM (2018) International conference “Regional problems of earth remote sensing” (Krasnoyarsk): five years of activity. Curr Prob Remote Sens Earth Space 15(7):261–265. https://doi.org/10.21046/2070-7401-2018-15-7-261-265
Melyancev VA (2017) Smart technologies, solow’s paradox and contradictions of the world socio-economic developments in the early twenty first century. Afro-Aziatskie Obshchestva: Istoriia i Sovremennost 3:162–180
Government of the Russian Federation (2019) Order “On approval of the list of investment projects being implemented as part of the Yenisei Siberia complex investment project and approval of an action plan for their implementation” (March 29, 2019 No. 571-p). Moscow, Russia: Garant. Retrieved from https://base.garant.ru/72212312/
Phillips F, Alarakhia S, Limprayoon P (2014) The Triple Helix: International cases and critical summary. In Oh DS, Phillips F (eds) Technopolis. Springer, London, UK, pp 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5508-9_4
Popkova E, Gornostaeva Z, Tregulova N (2018) Role of innovations in provision of competitiveness and innovational development of economy and overcoming of “underdevelopment whirlpools” in Russia and countries of Eastern Europe. J Entrepreneurship Emerg Econ 10(3):511–523
Vajsman ED, Podshivalova MV (2015) Relevant factors of innovative activity of small business in the regions. Econ Region 4:309–322
Visvizi A, Lytras M, Damiani E, Mathkour H (2018) Policy making for smart cities: innovation and social inclusive economic growth for sustainability. J Sci Technol Policy Manag 9(2):126–133
Worden K, Bullough WA, Haywood J (eds) (2003) The smart approach—an introduction to smart technologies. In Smart technologies. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812705310_0001
Yakovlev AS (2016) Supercomputers of the world: new problems or new opportunities? Young Sci 6–3(110):46–48
Zelenskaya TV, Sokolova EL (2012) The infrastructure in the innovation system: Functions, levels, and forms. Siberian J. Sci. Technol. 2(42):162–166
Acknowledgements
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-010-00482.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Panteleeva, I.A., Byvshev, V.I., Parfentieva, K.V., Demin, V.G. (2022). On Regional Infrastructure of State Support for the Development of Smart Technology: Case of the Krasnoyarsk Territory. In: Bogoviz, A.V., Suglobov, A.E., Maloletko, A.N., Kaurova, O.V. (eds) Сooperation and Sustainable Development. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_187
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_187
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76999-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77000-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)