Skip to main content

Alternative Measures for Determining the Risk of Tripping

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 220))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1810 Accesses

Abstract

Falls are a major public health issue and many are caused by tripping. An important indicator of the risk of tripping is the minimum foot clearance. Current practices assess the mean and standard deviation of minimum foot clearance values to measure the tripping risk with lower mean and/or higher minimum foot clearance variability being associated with higher risk of tripping. However, this method of representing the foot trajectory by a single point and using the most basic linear statistics to analyze the data may be an oversimplification. In this paper, we search the current literature for alternative approaches of interpreting foot trajectory data to more accurately assess the risk of tripping. We discuss methods outlined by five different papers, each introducing a novel analysis of foot clearance data. We also propose an improved general model to estimate an individual’s probability of tripping by pooling the methods from the five papers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parachute: Fall prevention (2014). https://www.parachutecanada.org/injury-topics/item/fall-prevention1

  2. Blake, A.J., Morgan, K., Bendall, M.J., Dallosso, H., Ebrahim, S.B.J., Arie, T.A., Bassey, E.J.: Falls by elderly people at home: prevalence and associated factors. Age Ageing 17(6), 365–372 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Winter, D.A.: Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Begg, R., Best, R., Dell’Oro, L., Taylor, S.: Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls. Gait Posture 25(2), 191–198 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benson, L.C., Cobb, S.C., Hyngstrom, A.S., Keenan, K.G., Luo, J., O’Connor, K.M.: A principal components analysis approach to quantifying foot clearance and foot clearance variability. J. Appl. Biomech. 35, 116–122 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khandoker, A.H., Palaniswami, M., Begg, R.K.: A comparative study on approximate entropy measure and poincare plot indexes of minimum foot clearance variability in the elderly during walking. J. Neuro-eng. Rehabil. 5(1), 4 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Best, R., Begg, R.: A method for calculating the probability of tripping while walking. J. Biomech. 41(5), 1147–1151 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Byju, A.G., Nussbaum, M.A., Madigan, M.L.: Alternative measures of toe trajectory more accurately predict the probability of tripping than minimum toe clearance. J. Biomech. 49(16), 4016–4021 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schulz, B.W.: A new measure of trip risk integrating minimum foot clearance and dynamic stability across the swing phase of gait. J. Biomech. 55, 107–112 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Begg, R.K., Palaniswami, M., Owen, B.: Support vector machines for automated gait classification. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52(5), 828–838 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pincus, S.M., Goldberger, A.L.: Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify? Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 266(4), H1643–H1656 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daffertshofer, A., Lamoth, C.J., Meijer, O.G., Beek, P.J.: PCA in studying coordination and variability: a tutorial. Clin. Biomech. 19(4), 415–428 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toronto, C.O.: Accessibility Design Guidelines (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Americans with disabilities act (ADA) standards

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghazaleh Delfi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Delfi, G., Al Bochi, A., Dutta, T. (2021). Alternative Measures for Determining the Risk of Tripping. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_80

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_80

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74604-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74605-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics