Skip to main content

Dynamic Workstation Exposure: Does Sex Affect Response?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Abstract

In the literature, little is known about the vagal response during exposure to a sit-stand workstation. This study measured the vagal response to exposure to a dynamic workstation that moved between sitting and standing heights for different regular durations and documented sex-related response. Fourteen workers (43.6 ± 4.0 years of age; 16.1 ± 4.1 years of experience) who work normally with computers (seven women, seven men of working age) were exposed to a dynamic workstation in their everyday office work environment. Heart rate variability (HRV) was used to measure the vagal activity with SD1, SD2 and MeanRR indicators, and questionnaires measured musculoskeletal health. Indicator of overall physiological response (HRV) to a dynamic workstation appears to be related to sex among a cohort of experienced office workers, where women showed a higher vagal response than men, and men had a decrease in body regions with musculoskeletal discomfort. More attention should provide to sex-specific responses to a dynamic workstation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koren, K., Pišot, R., Šimunič, B.: Active workstation allows office workers to work efficiently while sitting and exercising moderately. Appl. Ergon. 54, 83–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Järvelin-Pasanen, S., Sinikallio, S., Tarvainen, M.P.: Heart rate variability and occupational stress—systematic review. Ind. Health 56(6), 500–511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2017-0190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tonello, L., Rodrigues, F.B., Souza, J.W.S., Campbell, C.S.G., Leicht, A.S., Boullosa, D.A: The role of physical activity and heart rate variability for the control of work-related stress. Front. Physiol., 5(67) (2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00067

  4. Koenig, J., Loerbroks, A., Jarczok, M.N., Fischer, J.E., Thayer, J.F.: Chronic pain and heart rate variability in a cross-sectional occupational sample: evidence for impaired vagal control. Clin. J. Pain 32(3), 218–25 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong, I.S., Ostry, A.S., Demers, P., Davies, H.W.: Job strain and shift work influences on biomarkers and subclinical heart disease indicators: a pilot study. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 9, 467–477 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2012.693831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramírez, E., Ortega, A.R., Reyes Del Paso, G.A.: Anxiety, attention, and decision making: The moderating role of heart rate variability. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 490, 490–496 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kemp, A.H., Quintana, D.S.: The relationship between mental and physical health: insights from the study of heart rate variability. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 89(3), 288–96 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hallman, D.M., Ekman, A.H., Lyskov, E.: Changes in physical activity and heart rate variability in chronic neck–shoulder pain: monitoring during work and leisure time. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 87(7), 735–44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0917-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckley, J.P., Hedge, A., Yates, T., Copeland, R.J., Loosemore, M., Hamer, M., Bradley, G., Dunstan, D.W.: The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity. Br. J. Sports Med. 49(21), 1357–1362 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-094618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaffer, F., Ginsberg, J.P.: An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front. Public Health. 5, 258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuorinka, I., Jonsson, B., Kilbom, A., Vinterberg, H., Biering-Sørensen, F., Andersson, G., et al.: Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl. Ergon. 18(3), 233–237 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lindberg, C.M., et al.: Effects of office workstation type on physical activity and stress. Occup. Environ. Med. 75(10), 689–695 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chambers, A.J., Robertson, M.M., Baker, N.: The effect of sit-stand desks on office worker behavioral and health outcomes: a scoping review. Appl. Ergon. 7, 37–53 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mengistab, D.: Sedentariness, productivity, perception and long term health effects of sit-stand workstation at work: a literature review. Thesis. New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2019). https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/theses/1657

  15. Black, N.L., Tremblay, M., Mougnol, G., McGrath, M., Kengne, P.: Challenges of controlled measures in real Office environments: Impact of workstation stand-sit height variations. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference of the Association of Canadian Ergonomists and 6th Conference of CROSH, pp. 47–48 (2018). https://crosh.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/FINAL-Conference-Proceedings-ACE-CROSH-2018_sm.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu Tremblay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tremblay, M., Black, N.L., Morin, JP. (2021). Dynamic Workstation Exposure: Does Sex Affect Response?. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_63

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74604-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74605-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics