Abstract
This chapter aims to situate cultural and moral dimensions of Norwegian educational leadership within the broader social and political environment and in relation to political-ideological transformations that have taken place during the last 70 years. The analysis draws on historical and contemporary research on education policy and leadership. I start by drawing attention to some aspects of the ideology and history of Norwegian education to demonstrate the historical, political and cultural embeddedness of the education system. Purposes, curricula and moral foundation will be highlighted, and this analysis will be followed by a presentation of key principles for organising and leading schools today. I will use findings from three comparative research studies among school leaders to illustrate and discuss changes in conceptualizing educational leadership over time, and why. These findings indicate which conditions there are in Norway for adoption of theories of school leadership and governance that have been circulating internationally in research network. Finally, I will discuss how the cultural dimensions and key principles for organising and leading schools intersect with current globalised policy trends, and where there is likely to be tensions between these global trends and the political, cultural and historical imperatives of educational leadership and schooling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
At the same time, the nation-building project tended, in the past, to exclude the cultural rights of ethnic minorities in education. This was the case, for instance, for the Sami people and the Kvens (Stugu, 2001).
- 2.
In the new millennium, the individual aspect of equity in public discourse has increasingly been restricted to discussions about student performance in both national tests and international comparative assessments and to the demand for school choice (Volckmar, 2019).
- 3.
In 2019–2020, there were 792 schools with fewer than 100 students out of the total 2800 compulsory schools; 195 schools, most of which are located in the Oslo area, had more than 500 students (UDIR, 2019).
- 4.
There is, however, immense regional variation. While 16% of the upper secondary students in Oslo and Hordaland (including Bergen) attend a private school, fewer than 1% do so in Finnmark.
- 5.
The principals who participated in the LEXEL project from 2012–2016 told similar stories when they argued that feeling safe and confident, both academically and socially, served as the foundation for students’ well-being (Ottesen & Møller, 2016).
References
Apple, M., & Beane, J. A. (2007). Democratic schools: Lessons from the chalk face. Open University Press.
Berg, G. (2000). Steering in and steering of the school. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Møller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers. International perspectives in changing times (pp. 195–210). The Falmer Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1996). Understanding. Theory, Culture and Society, 13(2), 17–37.
Camphuijsen, M. K., Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2020). Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: Exploring drivers, expectations and strategies. Journal of Education Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337
Carpenter, B. W., & Brewer, C. (2014). The implicated advocate: The discursive construction of the democratic practices of school principals in the USA. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 294–306.
Englund, T. (1994). Education as a citizenship right – A concept in transition: Sweden related to other Western democracies and political philosophy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(4), 383–399.
Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 247–266.
Furman, G. C., & Shields, C. M. (2005). How can educational leaders promote and support social justice and democratic community in schools? In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 119–137). Teachers College Press.
Hagemann, G. (1992). Skolefolk. Lærernes historie i Norge. Ad Notam Gyldendal.
Hall, J. (2016). Examining school inspectors and education directors within the organisation of school inspection policy: Perceptions and views. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1120234
Hall, D., Møller, J., Schratz, M., & Serpieri, R. (2017). From welfarism to neo-liberalism: Conceptualizing the diversity of leadership models in Europe. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership (pp. 311–334). Wiley-Blackwell.
Karseth, B., & Møller, J. (2018). Legal regulation and professional discretion in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 195–210.
Mausethagen, S. (2013). Reshaping teacher professionalism. An analysis of how teachers construct and negotiate professionalism under increasing accountability. [Doctoral dissertation, Oslo and Akershus University College, Oslo]. https://oda.hioa.no/nb/reshaping-teacher-professionalism-an-analysis-of-how-teachers-construct-and-negotiate-professionalism-under-increasing-accountability
Møller, J. (2004). Lederidentiteter i skolen. Posisjonering, forhandlinger og tilhørighet. Universitetsforlaget.
Møller, J. (2005). Reason and emotion: Coping with accountability. In C. Sugrue (Ed.), Passionate principalship: Learning from life histories of school leaders (Chapter 6). Routledge Falmer.
Møller, J. (2006). Democratic schooling in Norway: Implications for leadership in practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(1), 53–69.
Møller, J. (2007). Educational leadership and the new language of learning. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(1), 31–49.
Møller, J. (2009). Approaches to school leadership in Scandinavia. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 41(2), 165–177.
Møller, J. (2012). The construction of a public face as a school principal. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(5), 452–460.
Møller, J. (2017). Leading beyond what works. European Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 375–385.
Møller, J., & Eggen, A. B. (2005). Team leadership in upper secondary education. School Leadership & Management, 25(4), 331–347.
Møller, J., & Ottesen, E. (2011). Building leadership capacity: The Norwegian approach. In International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 619–635). Springer.
Møller, J., & Rönnberg, L. (2021). Critical perspectives in and approaches to educational leadership in two Nordic countries. In S. J. Courtney, H. M. Gunter, R. Niesche, & T. Trujillo (Eds.), Understanding educational leadership: Critical perspectives and approaches. Chapter 7, Bloomsbury.
Møller, J., & Schratz, M. (2008). Leadership development in Europe. In G. Crow, J. Lumby, & P. Pashiardis (Eds.), UCEA/BELMAS/CCEAM international handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders (pp. 341–367). Erlbaum Publishing Company.
Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernizing education: NPM reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration & History, 45(4), 336–353.
Ottesen, E., & Møller, J. (2016). Organisational routines – The interplay of legal standards and professional discretion. European Educational Research Journal, 15(4), 428–446.
Sejersted, F. (1997). Lederskap og demokratisk kapitalisme [Leadership and democratic capitalism]. In H. Byrkjeflot (Ed.), Fra styring til ledelse [From management to leadership], (pp. 33–52). Fagbokforlaget.
Sejersted, F. (2004). Sosialdemokratiets tidsalder [The age of social democracy]. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 21(3–4), 250–263.
Skedsmo, G. (2011). Formulation and realisation of evaluation policy: Inconsistencies and problematic issues. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(1), 5–20.
Skedsmo, G., & Møller, J. (2016). Governing by new performance expectations in Norwegian schools. In H. Gunter, E. Grimaldi, D. Hall, & R. Serpieri (Eds.), NPM and educational reform in Europe. Routledge.
Stugu, O. S. (2001). Educational ideals and nation building in Norway 1840–1900. In S. Ahonen & J. Rantala (Eds), Nordic lights. Education for nation and civic society in the Nordic countries, 1850–2000 (pp. 107–123). Studia Fennica, Historica 1.
Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.
Tjeldvoll, A., Wales, C., & Welle-Strand, A. (2005). School leadership training under globalisation: Comparisons of the UK, the US and Norway. Managing Global Transitions, 3(1), 23–49.
Trujillo, T., Møller, J., Jensen, R., Kissel, R., & Larsen, E. (2021). Images of educational leadership: How principals make sense of democracy and social justice in two distinct policy contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20981148
UDIR. (2019). Utdanningsspeilet 2019. Utdanningsdirektoratet.
Volckmar, N. (2019). The enduring quest for equity in education: Comparing Norway and Australia. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(4), 617–631.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Møller, J. (2021). Images of Norwegian Educational Leadership – Historical and Current Distinctions. In: Normand, R., Moos, L., Liu, M., Tulowitzki, P. (eds) The Cultural and Social Foundations of Educational Leadership. Educational Governance Research, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74497-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74497-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74496-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74497-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)