Abstract
Numerical and quantificational expressions differ not only in their logical meaning, but also in their conditions of use. In particular, One hypothesis suggested in previous work states that vague expressions should be associated with informality and precise expressions with formality. We introduce a novel corpus measure, the SOLT, to quantify formality of an expression and show that it correlates well with established data on formality. We then apply the SOLT to numerical and quantificational expression to test the hypothesis that vagueness and informality are related. We find that there is some support for the hypothesis, but the relation is not straightforward as claimed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
German also has derived forms such as einzigste (‘only-est’) that are felt to be colloquial by native speakers, though neither of the component morphemes is. Derived forms in general do not occur as entries in the dictionary, so I put aside such forms.
- 3.
These numbers are rather approximate especially since frequently only a specific form or meaning of a lemma is annotated for style. E.g., Anzahl (‘number’) is unmarked, but the plural Anzahlen is marked as specialist language.
- 4.
The dictionary does not describe on what basis the stylistic annotations were assigned. The dictionary states that it also heavily relies on a corpus of the Duden Verlag, which I didn’t have access to.
- 5.
For ‘formal’, random numbers below 3906 would point to occurrences of ‘elevated’, those above after subtraction of 3905 to occurrences of ‘specialist language’.
- 6.
The bimorphemic Dreizehn (‘thirteen’) with SOLT 0.64 seems to be an outlier possibly due to its occurrence in fixed expressions such as jetzt schlägt’s dreizehn (‘I’m very surprised.’. lit. ‘Now it rings 13.’).
References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, Steven Walker, Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen, Henrik Singmann, Bin Dai & Gabor Grothendieck. 2015. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4, version 1.1-10. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Brown, Gillian R & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Burnett, Heather. 2017. Signalling games, sociolinguistic variation and the construction of style. Linguistics and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-018-9254-y.
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dudenredaktion. 2015. Duden - Deutsches Universalwörterbuch: Das umfassende Bedeutungswörterbuch der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Duden Verlag.
Duffley, Patrick J & Pierre Larrivée. 2012. Exploring the relation between the qualitative and quantitative uses of the determiner some. English Language and Linguistics 16(1). 131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000311.
Hörmann, Hans. 1983. The calculating listener or how many are einige, mehrere, and ein paar (some, several, and a few). In Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 221–234. Berlin: de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.
Leifeld, Philip. 2014. texreg: Conversion of statistical model output in R to LaTeX and HTML tables. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v055.i08. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=texreg. R package version 1.33.
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Smith, E, Kathleen Currie Hall & Benjamin Munson. 2010. Bringing semantics to sociophonetics: Social variables and secondary entailments. Laboratory Phonology 1(1). 121–155. https://doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.007.
Solt, Stephanie. 2006. Why a few? and why not *a many. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10. 333–346. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2006.v10i2.736.
Solt, Stephanie. 2009. The semantics of adjectives of quantity. New York, NY: The City University of New York dissertation.
Solt, Stephanie. 2014. An alternative theory of imprecision. In Semantics and linguistic theory, vol. 24. 514–533. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2446.
Solt, Stephanie. 2015a. Q-adjectives and the semantics of quantity. Journal of Semantics 32. 221–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/fft018.
Solt, Stephanie. 2015b. Vagueness and imprecision: Empirical foundations. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-125150.
Solt, Stephanie, Chris Cummins & Marijan Palmović. 2017. The preference for approximation. International Review of Pragmatics 9. 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00901010.
Solt, Stephanie & Jon Stevens. 2018. Some three students: Towards a unified account of some. In Semantics and linguistic theory, vol. 28. 345–365. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4436.
Stevens, Jon & Stephanie Solt. 2018. The semantics and pragmatics of “some 27 arrests”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 24(1:21).
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Stephanie Solt for many inspiring and motivating remarks on this and other work of mine. I also thank Artemis Alexiadou and Roland Mühlenbernd for helpful comments, Kai Sauerland for providing a Python skript, and Renata Shamsutdinova for editorial help. Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—SFB 1412, 416591334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Data of the Validation Study
Data of the Validation Study
Number | Lemma | Marking | Kern | Untertitel | Total | SOLT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | anstreben | elevated | 1925 | 108 | 2033 | 3.472466777 |
2. | Wiederkehr | elevated | 803 | 75 | 878 | 2.737149035 |
3. | behaglich | elevated | 760 | 59 | 819 | 3.003924107 |
4. | erachten | elevated | 1291 | 97 | 1388 | 3.051071991 |
5. | erschaffen | elevated | 393 | 1852 | 2245 | −2.919771333 |
6. | fernhalten | elevated | 733 | 699 | 1432 | −0.614767709 |
7. | Geschehnis | elevated | 664 | 100 | 764 | 2.04789479 |
8. | zurückkehren | elevated | 4463 | 3121 | 7584 | −0.167283002 |
9. | indessen | elevated | 2628 | 18 | 2646 | 6.506536107 |
10. | zugehören | elevated | 618 | 729 | 1347 | −0.921600428 |
11. | mithin | elevated | 923 | 2 | 925 | 8.166898386 |
12. | ausnehmend | elevated | 1676 | 402 | 2078 | 1.376466291 |
13. | obschon | elevated | 749 | 20 | 769 | 4.543605362 |
14. | zudem | elevated | 2974 | 321 | 3295 | 2.528470993 |
15. | überaus | elevated | 1983 | 339 | 2322 | 1.865039047 |
16. | überbringen | elevated | 568 | 541 | 1109 | −0.613026116 |
17. | umher | elevated | 1437 | 398 | 1835 | 1.168931274 |
18. | Bemühen | elevated | 1193 | 100 | 1293 | 2.893233686 |
19. | verkünden | elevated | 2805 | 569 | 3374 | 1.618211762 |
20. | vollbringen | elevated | 982 | 539 | 1521 | 0.1821493 |
1. | abschie\(\beta \)en | unmarked | 1578 | 557 | 2135 | 0.819059521 |
2. | Auslegung | unmarked | 1401 | 29 | 1430 | 4.910971794 |
3. | Bündnis | unmarked | 2706 | 180 | 2886 | 3.226804576 |
4. | erbrmlich | unmarked | 412 | 901 | 1313 | −1.81217122 |
5. | Fachleute | unmarked | 1001 | 43 | 1044 | 3.857673052 |
6. | formal | unmarked | 3012 | 57 | 3069 | 5.040327589 |
7. | Freak | unmarked | 31 | 930 | 961 | −5.590179047 |
8. | Gras | unmarked | 1812 | 1589 | 3401 | −0.493824621 |
9. | herum | unmarked | 7218 | 4851 | 12069 | −0.109971488 |
10. | oft | unmarked | 26097 | 9830 | 35927 | 0.725332197 |
11. | plus | unmarked | 1021 | 752 | 1773 | −0.242110152 |
12. | probieren | unmarked | 949 | 3274 | 4223 | −2.469862781 |
13. | respektieren | unmarked | 1215 | 1751 | 2966 | −1.210511222 |
14. | Salon | unmarked | 1263 | 370 | 1633 | 1.087969012 |
15. | selbständig | unmarked | 4855 | 105 | 4960 | 4.847721611 |
16. | Sippe | unmarked | 699 | 76 | 775 | 2.51793268 |
17. | teilen | unmarked | 9917 | 5140 | 15057 | 0.264846945 |
18. | unbestimmt | unmarked | 1342 | 103 | 1445 | 3.020379977 |
19. | Verhaftung | unmarked | 1416 | 609 | 2025 | 0.534018681 |
20. | wegen | unmarked | 24140 | 26823 | 50963 | −0.835333379 |
1. | aufbleiben | colloquial | 23 | 112 | 135 | −2.967081418 |
2. | aufgedreht | colloquial | 127 | 224 | 351 | −1.501958687 |
3. | eh | colloquial | 687 | 2151 | 2838 | −2.329913972 |
4. | Eisenbahner | colloquial | 293 | 37 | 330 | 2.302015037 |
5. | fremdgehen | colloquial | 16 | 88 | 104 | −3.14272007 |
6. | Halbe | colloquial | 93 | 57 | 150 | 0.022980345 |
7. | hinauswerfen | colloquial | 235 | 99 | 334 | 0.563871875 |
8. | hinwollen | colloquial | 18 | 83 | 101 | −2.888402882 |
9. | Kopfweh | colloquial | 40 | 107 | 147 | −2.102827343 |
10. | loskommen | colloquial | 169 | 81 | 250 | 0.377740982 |
11. | Oscar | colloquial | 328 | 781 | 1109 | −1.934915185 |
12. | protzen | colloquial | 87 | 26 | 113 | 1.059215326 |
13. | Pulli | colloquial | 52 | 277 | 329 | −3.0965909 |
14. | Rheuma | colloquial | 81 | 47 | 128 | 0.1019727 |
15. | Teufelskerl | colloquial | 14 | 122 | 136 | −3.806670867 |
16. | übern | colloquial | 137 | 75 | 212 | 0.185924941 |
17. | verdreschen | colloquial | 45 | 83 | 128 | −1.566474787 |
18. | verheddern | colloquial | 69 | 54 | 123 | −0.329651497 |
19. | Wirtschaftswunder | colloquial | 100 | 5 | 105 | 3.638639643 |
20. | wuchten | colloquial | 109 | 4 | 113 | 4.084895873 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sauerland, U. (2022). Quantifying the Register of German Quantificational Expressions: A Corpus-Based Study. In: Gotzner, N., Sauerland, U. (eds) Measurements, Numerals and Scales. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73323-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73323-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73322-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73323-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)