Abstract
In this chapter we propose a new tool, the Heuristic Drawings Process Tool (HDPT), rooted in Dewey’s (1934), Rorty’s (1989, 1991) and Davidson’s (2001, 2004) pragmatism approach that helps both to formulate problems and to reach an agreed solution in the stakeholder engagement process. Problem identification and formulation are not always obvious, nor do they always consider the unconscious and emotional aspects. The latter are sometimes poorly understood and/or sometimes taken for granted in business and stakeholder relationships. The HDPT consists of 4 phases, in which business and stakeholder participants in a workshop 1) prepare and understand specific rules, 2) freely draw the assigned business and stakeholder relationship (on a poster), 3) generate new narratives and vocabularies through their readings and descriptions of these posters (images/drawings), enabling them to talk without the risk of being censored and bringing out emotional and unconscious motives, 4) reach an agreement with all participants on an action plan to solve problems, thus, generating social hope and potentially improving the business and stakeholder relationship in the near future. The chapter presents the results of HDPT workshops applied in two companies, the Chemical Company SA, (with two stakeholders: the employees and the suppliers), and the company, Consulting IT SA (with one stakeholder: the employees). Both companies are located in Barcelona (Spain). The HDPT brought about two main effects after 2 months: 1) the adoption of the new HTPD narratives and vocabularies in business-stakeholder informal communications, b) the creation of three interrelated types of value: 1) economic gains (increasing profits), 2) emotional gains (reducing unpleasant and stressful emotions while at the same time increasing social hope), and 3) relational gains (increasing trust).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archel, Pablo, Javier Husillos, and Crawford Spence. 2011. The institutionalization of unaccountability: Loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36 (6): 327–343.
Auster, Ellen, and R. Edward Freeman. 2013. Values and poetic organizations: Beyond value fit toward values through conversation. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1): 39–49.
Bosse, Douglas, Robert Phillips, and Jeffrey Harrison. 2009. Stakeholders, reciprocity, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 30: 447–456.
Bridoux, Flore, and J.W. Stoelhorst. 2016. Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. The Academy of Management Review 41 (2): 229–251.
Brown, Judy, and Jesse Dillard. 2013. Critical accounting and communicative action: On the limits of consensual deliberation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 24 (3): 176–190.
Davidson, Donaldson. 2001a. Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2001b. Essays on actions and events. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 2004. Problems of Rationality: Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2005. Truth, language, and history. Philosophical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 1894. The theory of emotion. (II) Emotional attitudes. Psychological Review 1: 553–569.
———. 1895. The theory of emotion. (2) The significance of emotions. Psychological Review 2: 13–32.
Dewey, J. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Minton, Balch & Company.
Fiske, Alan Page. 1991. Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.
———. 1992. The four elemental forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review 99: 689–723.
———. 2004. Relational models theory 2.0. In Relational models theory: A contemporary overview: 3–25, ed. N. Haslam. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
———. 2012. Metarelational models: Configurations of social relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology 42: 2–18.
Freeman, R. Edward, and Michelle Greenwood. 2020. Deepening methods in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 161 (1): 1–3.
Freeman, R. Edward, Kujala Johanna, and Sachs Sybille. 2017. Stakeholder engagement: Clinical research cases. Springer.
Gallhofer, Sonja, Jim Haslam, and Akira Yonekura. 2015. Accounting as differentiated universal for emancipatory praxis: accounting delineation and mobilisation for emancipation(s) recognizing democracy and difference. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28 (5): 846–874.
Georgakopoulos, George, and Ian Thomson. 2008. Social reporting, engagements, controversies and conflict in an arena context. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (8): 1116–1143.
Greenwood, Michelle. 2007. Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4): 315–327.
Harrison, Jeffrey, Douglas Bosse, and Robert Phillips. 2010. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 31: 58–74.
Jones, Thomas, and William Felps. 2013a. Shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare: A utilitarian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly 23: 207–238.
———. 2013b. Stakeholder happiness enhancement: A neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly 23: 349–379.
Laplume, Andre, K. Saurav Sonpar, and Remy Litz. 2008. Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management 34 (6): 1152–1189.
Passetti, E., L. Bianchi, M. Battaglia, and M. Frey. 2019. When democratic principles are not enough: Tensions and temporalities of dialogic stakeholder engagement. Journal of Business Ethics 155 (1): 173–190.
Preziosa, M. 2016. La mentalidad compartida en la empresa. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Teseo.
Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1991a. Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1991b. Essays on Heidegger and others: Philosophical papers. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tregidga, H., M. Milneb, and K. Kearinsa. 2014. (Re)presenting sustainable organizations accounting. Organizations and Society 39 (6): 477–494.
Unerman, Jeffrey, and Mark Bennett. 2004. Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting. Organizations and Society 29 (7): 685–707.
Winkler, Anne-Laure P., Jill A. Brown, and David L. Finegold. 2019. Employees as conduits for effective stakeholder engagement: An example from B corporations. Journal of Business Ethics 160 (4): 913–936.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garriga, E. (2022). Unfolding Business and Stakeholder Relationships: The Heuristic Drawing Process Tool. In: Dion, M., Freeman, R.E., Dmytriyev, S.D. (eds) Humanizing Business. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 53. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72204-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72203-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72204-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)