Abstract
In a supply chain, parameters such as demand, service times and the flow between nodes are commonly assumed to be constant quantities for the time horizon or window, while transformation is also assumed to be immediate. However, this is not the way it is. Demand is random; operations require a processing time that is also random, and this causes variations in the links of a chain that generate queues. Cycle time and the amount of work in process are properties that quantify the performance of the flow within a network subject to the effects of the system’s innate variability. This document provides a series of steps for analyzing optimal flow in a supply chain by using analytical methods. First, we use the minimum cost flow model to find the optimal solution for the distribution of the product in the chain. Then, assuming that each link in the chain is a G/G/c queueing system, the cycle time and quantity of work in process are quantified for the optimal solution in three scenarios of service time and demand variability. We used for our example the data corresponding to the three-level supply chain, in the context of the vehicle industry. Taking as a reference a scenario where variability is low (C2s <= 0.5), the cycle time in the network increases its value to six times its value when there is high variability throughout the system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ballou RH (2003) Supply chain management. 5th edn. Prentice—Hall, New Jersey.
Bandaly D, Satir A, Shanker L (2016) Impact of lead time variability in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 180:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.014
Bazaraa MS, Jarvis JJ, Sherali HD (1974) Linear programming and network flows. Wiley, New Jersey
Bhaskar V, Lallement P (2010) Modeling a supply chain using a network of queues. Appl Math Model 34(2010):2074–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.10.019
Bhaskar V, Lallement P (2011) Queuing network model of uniformly distributed arrivals in a distributed supply chain using subcontracting. Decis Support Syst 51(2011):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.029
Curry GL, Feldman RM (2009) Manufacturing systems modeling and analysis. Springer, Berlin
Cruz FRB, van Woensel T (2014) Finite queueing modeling and optimization: a selected review. J Appl Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/374962
Gong Q, Lai L, Wang S (2008) Supply chain networks: closed Jackson network models and properties. Int J Product Econo 113(2008):567–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.10.013
Gross D, Shortle JF, Thompson JM (2008) Fundamentals of queueing theory. Wiley, New Jersey
Guerrero-Campanur A (2013) Supplier selection in an inventory location problem for a three-level supply chain. Doctoral thesis, UPAEP, Puebla, Mexico
He X, Hu W (2014) Modelling relief demands in an emergency supply chain system under large-scale disasters based on a queueing network. Sci World J 2014:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/195053
Hernández-González S, Hernández Ripalda D (2018) Managerial approaches toward queueing systems and simulations. IGI Global, Pensilvania
Hernández-González S, Flores de la Mota I, Jiménez-García JA, Hernández-Ripalda MD (2017) Numerical analysis of minimum cost network flow with queuing stations: the M/M/1 case. Nova Sci 9(18):257–289. https://doi.org/10.21640/ns.v9i18.840
Hopp WJ (2011) Supply chain science. Waveland Press, Long Grove
Hopp WJ, Spearman ML (2001) Factory physics. Waveland Press, Long Grove
Hum S, Parlar M, Zhou Y (2018) Measurement and optimization of responsiveness in supply chain networks with queueing structures. Eur J Oper Res 264(1):106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.009
Jackson JR (1957) Networks of waiting lines. Oper Res 5(4):518–521. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.5.4.518
Jackson JR (1963) Job-shop like queueing systems. Manage Sci 10(1):131–142. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.10.1.131
Kerbache L, MacGregor Smith J (2004) Queueing networks and the topological design of supply chain systems. Int J Product Econ 91(2004):251–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.09.002
Liu L, Liu X & Yao D (2004) Analysis and optimization of a multistage inventory-queue system. Manage Sci 50(3):365–380. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0196
Little JDC (1961) A proof for the queuing formula: L = λW. Oper Res 9(3):383–387. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.9.3.383
MacGregorSmith J, Kerbache L (2017) Topological network design of closed finite capacity supply chain network. J Manuf Syst 45(2017):70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.08.001
Marmolejo JA, Rodríguez R, Cruz-Mejía O, Saucedo J (2016) Design of a distribution network using primal-dual decomposition. Math Probl Eng.https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7851625
Negri da Silva CR, Morabito R (2009) Performance evaluation and capacity planning in a metallurgical job-shop system using open queueing network models. Int J Prod Res 47:6589–6609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802350732
Pérez-Loaiza RE, Olivares-Benitez E, Miranda-González PA, Guerrero-Campanur A, Martínez-Flores JL (2017) Supply chain network design with efficiency, location and inventory policy using a multiobjetive evolutionary algorithm. Int Trans Oper Res 24:251–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12287
Scilab Enterprises (2012) Scilab: free and open source software for numerical computation (OS, Version 5.3.3). Available from: https://www.scilab.org
Vahdani B, Mohammadi M (2015) A bi-objective interval-stochastic robust optimization model for designing closed loop supply chain network with multi-priority queueing system. Int J Prod Econ 170:67–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.020
Wagner HM (1975) Principles of operations research, with applications to managerial decisions. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Whitt W (1983) The queueing network analyzer. Bell Syst Tech J 62(9):2779–2815. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1983.tb03204.x
Yousefi-Babadi A, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Seifi S (2017) Designing a reliable multi-objective queuing model of a petrochemical supply chain network under uncertainty: a case study. Comput Chem Eng 100:177–197.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.12.012
Zahiri B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Mohammadi M, Jula P (2014) Multi-objective design of an organ transplant network under uncertainty. Transp Res Part E 72:101–124.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.09.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mejía-Hernández, Y., Hernández-González, S., Guerrero-Campanur, A., Jiménez-García, J.A. (2021). Effect of Variability on the Optimal Flow of Goods in Supply Chains Using the Factory Physics Approach. In: García-Alcaraz, J.L., Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Z-Flores, E. (eds) Trends in Industrial Engineering Applications to Manufacturing Process. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71579-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71578-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71579-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)