Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Importance of Collaborative Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women's Mood Disorders

  • 1017 Accesses

Abstract

Perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMADs) are currently underdiagnosed and undertreated, with many women not receiving adequate treatment and remission of symptoms. PMADs are extremely treatable, and more thoughtful allocation of resources is required to improve screening, treatment initiation, and treatment response. A variety of system-level enhancements, such as collaborative care models, will ultimately be most successful in improving outcomes for patients and families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cox E, et al. The perinatal depression treatment cascade: baby steps towards improving outcomes. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(9):1189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodman J, Tyer-Viola L. Detection, treatment, and referral of perinatal depression and anxiety by obstetrical providers. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(3):477–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansotte E, Payne SI, Babich S. Positive postpartum depression screening practices and subsequent mental health treatment for low-income women in Western countries: a systematic literature review. Public Health Rev. 2017;38:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayrampour H, Hapsari A, Pavlovic J. Barriers to addressing perinatal mental health issues in midwifery settings. Midwifery. 2018;59:47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimmel MC, Bauer A, Meltzer-Brody S. Toward a framework for best practices and research guidelines for perinatal depression research. J Neurosci Res. 2020;98(7):1255–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Force USPST. Screening for depression in adults: U.S. Preventative Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:784–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Screening for Perinatal Depression. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 757. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):e208-e212.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connor EA, et al. Screening for depression in adult patients in primary care settings: a systematic evidence review. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thombs BD, et al. Depression screening and patient outcomes in pregnancy or postpartum: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2014;76:433–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kozhimannil K, et al. New Jersey’s efforts to improve postpartum depression did not change treatment patterns for women on Medicaid. Health Aff. 2011;30(2):293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yawn BP, et al. Postpartum depression: screening, diagnosis and management programs 2000 through 2010. Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:363964.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaudron LH, Wisner KL. Perinatal depression screening: let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water! J Psychosom Res. 2014;76:489–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Byatt N, et al. Enhancing participation in depression care in outpatient perinatal care settings: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):1048–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumeyer-Gromen A, et al. Disease management programs for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Care. 2004;42:1211–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Badamgarav E, et al. Effectiveness of disease management programs in depression: a systematic review. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:2080–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Solberg L, Trangle M, Wineman A. Follow-up and follow-through of depressed patients in primary care: the critical missing components of quality care. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2005;18:520–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Katon W, Robinson P, Von Korff M, et al. A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:924–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J, et al. Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2314–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Libr. 2012;10:1–276.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katon W, Russo J, Lin EH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(5):506–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chistensen H, Griffiths K, Gulliver A, et al. Models in the delivery of depression care: a systematic review of randomised and controlled intervention trials. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gensichen J. IMPACT collaborative care improves depression in elderly patients in primary care in the longer term. Evid Based Ment Health. 2006;9:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Melville JL, Reed S, Russo J, Croicu CA, Ludman E, LaRocco-Cockburn A, Katon W. Improving care for depression in obstetrics and gynecology: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Katon W, et al. A randomized trial of collaborative depression care in obstetrics and gynecology clinics: socioeconomic disadvantage and treatment response. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(1):32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang H, Tabb K, Cerimele JM, Ahmed N, Bhat A, Kester R. Collaborative care for women with depression: a systematic review. Psychosomatics. 2017;58:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dennis C. Psychosocial interventions for the treatment of perinatal depression. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28(1):97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grote NK, Simon G, Russo J, Lohr MJ, Carson K, Katon W. Incremental benefit-cost of MOMCare: collaborative care for perinatal depression among economically disadvantaged women. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(11):1164–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miranda J, Duan N, Sherbourne C, et al. Improving care for minorities: can quality improvement interventions improve care and outcomes for depressed minorities? Results of a randomized, controlled trial. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:613–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith JL, Rost K, Nutting PA, et al. Resolving disparities in antidepressant treatment and quality-of-life outcomes between uninsured and insured primary care patients with depression. Med Care. 2001;39:910–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang H, Bauer A, Wasse JK, et al. Care managers’ experiences in a collaborative care program for high risk mothers with depression. Psychosomatics. 2013;54(3):272–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Grote NK, Katon W, Russo JE, et al. A randomized trial of collaborative care for perinatal depression in socio-economically disadvantaged women: the impact of PTSD. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;72:1527–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York: F. Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Xaverius PK, Grady MA. Centering pregnancy in Missouri: a system level analysis. Sci World J. 2014;2014:285386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kimmel M. Maternal mental health MATTERS. N C Med J. 2020;81(1):45–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Byatt N, Biebel K, Moore Simas TA, et al. Improving perinatal depression care: the Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Project for Moms. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;40:12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Byatt N, Straus J, Stopa A, Biebel K, Mittal L, Moore Simas TA. Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Program for Moms: utilization and quality assessment. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(2):345–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. HRSA awards over $12M for maternal & child mental health programs. Health Resources & Services Administration: Rockville; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Price SK, Bentley K. Psychopharmacology decision-making among pregnant and postpartum women and health providers: informing compassionate and collaborative care women’s health. Women Health. 2013;53(2):154–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Elizabeth Cox

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Cox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Cox .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Elizabeth Cox

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cox, E. (2021). Importance of Collaborative Care. In: Cox, E. (eds) Women's Mood Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71497-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71497-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71496-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71497-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation