Skip to main content

Elements of Responsible Leadership in Driving Climate Action (SDG 13)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Development Goals for Society Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 947 Accesses

Abstract

The 2015 Paris Agreement on climate change calls for ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation efforts to limit global warming to a maximum 2 °C to curb climate change. Both the Paris Agreement and the Initiative for Climate Action Transparency (ICAT) emphasise the role of non-state actors, such as private sector companies, in setting ambitious mitigation targets. Leaders in the private sector are seen as critical in developing and implementing GHG emission targets. Thus, this study aimed to identify three elements of responsible leadership (RL) (the building of stakeholder relationships and RL drivers and roles) in climate action, specifically GHG target setting. Methodologically the study followed a grounded theory, inductive approach, analysing a single case study and the Equity Method for GHG emission target setting developed by Promethium Carbon. The findings showed that elements of RL did contribute to driving climate action in the private sector and are, therefore, the appropriate approach to address climate change. However, there is room for expansion in the RL definition and elements of the theory to develop an appropriate description of responsible climate leadership for developing countries. Based on the findings and analysis, a conceptual framework for responsible climate leadership in a developing country context was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, K.E. (2018). Critical internal shifts for Responsible Leadership. In: B.W Redekop, D.R. Gallagher & R. Satterwhite (Eds.), Innovation in Environmental Leadership: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge. https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781351795388/cfi/6/46!/4/2/2/2/4@0:0. Accessed 25 October 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, J.C.S. & de Oliveira, J.A.P. (2015). The Role of the Private Sector in Global Climate and Energy Governance, Journal of Business Ethics, 130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C., Donovan, J., Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. & Rossomme, J. (2004). Methods for studying leadership. In: J. Antonakis, A.T. Cianciolo & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Nature of Leadership, Second Edition. California: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, C.A. (2012). Interviews in Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W.G., & Thomas, R.J. (2002). Geeks and geezers: How era, values, and defining moments shape leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jongh, D., & Möllmann, C. (2014). Market Barriers for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in the South African Private Sector. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5),1107-1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frangieh, C.G., & Yaacoub, H.K. (2017). A systematic literature review of responsible leadership. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2),281-299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge, M., & Ross, K. (2019). Which Countries Have Long-term Strategies to Reduce Emissions?. Resource document. https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/09/which-countries-have-long-term-strategies-reduce-emissions. Accessed 25 October 2019.

  • ICAT. (2018). Initiative for Climate Action Transparency: Non-State and Subnational Action Guidance. Washington DC: World Resources Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Immink, H. (2019). GHG forecasting and target setting using an ex-post analysis. Dissertation. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5 Degree Celsius: An IPCC special report o the impacts of global warming of 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrial levels and related global GHG pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty (Summary for Policy Makers). Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempster, S., & Carroll, B. (2016). Introduction: Responsible leadership – realism and romanticism, In: S. Kempster & B. Carroll (Eds.), Responsible Leadership: Realism and romanticism. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krabbe, O., Linthorst, G., Blok, K., Crijns-Graus, W., van Vuuren, Detlef P., Höhne, N., Faria, P., Aden, N., & Pineda, A. C. (2015). Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goals. Nature Climate Change, 5(12),1057-1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci, 45,123-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T. (2007). Responsible Leadership, Stakeholder Engagement and the Emergence of Social Capital. Journal of Business Ethics,74,329-343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. (2006). Responsible Leadership in a Stakeholder Society: A Relational Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics,66,99-115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacTaggart, R.W., & Lynham, S.A. (2018). An integrative literature review of Responsible Leadership: Knowns, unknowns, and implications. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 15(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2012). Leadership for Sustainability: An Evolution of Leadership Ability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3),369-384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuser, J.D., Gardner, W.L., Dinh, J.E., Hu, J., Liden, R.C., & Lord, R.G. (2016). A Network Analysis of Leadership Theory. Journal of Management, 42(5),1374-1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P.H. (2010). Responsible Leadership Emerging: Individual, Organizational, and Collective Frontiers. Boston: Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S.C. & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating Climate Change: Closing the science-action gap, In: Dryzek, J.S., Norgaard, R.B. & Schlosberg, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (2009). Leadership in disaster: Learning for a future with global climate change. Quebec: McGill-Queen's University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P.G. (2016). Leadership : Theory and Practice. Seventh edition. International student edition. ed, Los Angeles, SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N.M. (2007). Understanding Responsible Leadership: Role Identity and Motivational Drivers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4),437-456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Promethiume Carbon. (2018). Equity Method for GHG Target Setting. Johannesburg: Promethium Carbon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redekop, B.W., & Thomas, M. (2018) Climate Change Leadership: From tragic to comic discourse. In: B.W. Redekop, D.R. Gallagher, R. Satterwhite (Eds.), Innovation in Environmental Leadership: Critical perspectives. New York: Routledge. https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781351795388/cfi/6/38!/4/2/2/2/4@0:0. Accessed 25 October 2019.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K.S. (2011). Leading sustainabililty. In: W.H Mobley, M. Li, Y. Wang (Eds.), Advances in Global Leadership. Bingley: Emerald Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterwhite, R. (2018). A Case for Universal Context: Intersections of the biosphere, systems, and justice using a critical constructionist lens. In: B.W. Redekop, D.R. Gallagher, R. Satterwhite (Eds.), Innovation in Environmental Leadership: Critical perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • SBTi. (2018). Science-Based Targets. https://sciencebasedtargets.org/about-the-science-based-targets-initiative/. Accessed 28 September.

  • Stern, N. (2015). Why are we waiting: The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, Md. K. (2017). Climate Change and Global Environmental Politics: North-South Divide. Environmental Policy and Law 47(3-4), 106-114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2019) Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M. & Scherer, A.G. (2012).Responsible Leadership In Global Business: A New Approach to Leadership and its Multi-Level Outcomes, Journal of Business Ethics, 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegtlin, C. (2016). What does it mean to be responsible? Addressing the missing responsibility dimension in ethical leadership research. Leadership, 12(5),581-608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D.A. & Galvin, B.M. (2008). Alternative Perspectives of Responsible Leadership, Organizational Dynamics, 37(4),327-341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEF. (2019). The Global Risks Report 2019. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karien Erasmus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erasmus, K., Steenkamp, Y. (2021). Elements of Responsible Leadership in Driving Climate Action (SDG 13). In: Nhamo, G., Chikodzi, D., Dube, K. (eds) Sustainable Development Goals for Society Vol. 2. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70952-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics