Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peer Assistant Role Models in a Graduate Computer Science Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning

  • 1031 Accesses

Abstract

This paper reports the development and testing of a new intervention to recruit terminal Master’s students into computer science (CS) PhD programs and to enhance diversity in academic CS. We introduced peer assistants (i.e., successful PhD students) to CSCI 549: Intelligent Systems, a popular course for Master’s students with approximately 40–50% women and 90% international students. Although there is a fair amount of diversity in this course and in the CS Master’s program generally (i.e., international female students), many of these students do not continue to earn a PhD or get involved in research during the Master’s program. Because increasing the diversity of CS professors is imperative for enhancing the diversity of CS majors and the CS workforce, it is critical to test new methods to recruit Master’s students from underrepresented groups into academic CS. To address this need, we introduced PhD student peer assistants into Intelligent Systems not only to help Master’s students with in-class research projects but to also act as role models to promote Master’s students’ interest in CS research and PhD programs. Thus, this paper suggests a new and innovative technique for an enhancing diversity in academic CS and STEM generally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. S. Asgari, N. Dasgupta, N.G. Cote, When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes? Soc. Psychol. 41, 203–211 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191–215 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bureau of Labor (2014). Statistics Projections. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/oes/tables.htm

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Cheryan, V.C. Plaut, C. Handron, L. Hudson, The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex Roles 69(1–2), 58–71 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B.L. Christe, The importance of faculty-student connections in STEM disciplines. J. STEM Educ.: Innov. Res. 14, 23–26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Dasgupta, Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychol. Inq. 22, 231–246 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.C. Dennehy, N. Dasgupta, Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 5964–5969 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Eccles, Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors, in Achievement and Achievement Motivation, ed. by J. T. Spence, (Freeman, San Francisco, 1983), pp. 75–146

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.B. Freeman, W. Huang, Collaborating with people like me: Ethnic coauthorship within the United States. J. Labor Econ. 33, S289–S318 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ibarra, H., & Petriglieri, J. L. (2008). Impossible Selves: Image Strategies and Identity Threat in Professional Women’s Career Transitions (INSEAD Working Paper). Retrieved from the INSEAD website: http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/details_papers.cfm?id18683

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Gauntlett, Media, Gender, and Identity (Routledge, London, 2002). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360798

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. D.E. Gibson, Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. J. Vocat. Behav. 65, 134–156 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. N.J. Goldstein, I.S. Vezich, J.R. Shapiro, Perceived perspective taking: When others walk in our shoes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106(6), 941–960 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Good, A. Rattan, C.S. Dweck, Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 700–717 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Gross, E.S. Pietri, G. Anderson, K. Moyano-Camihort, M.J. Graham, Increased preclass preparation underlies student outcome improvement in the flipped classroom. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 14, ar36 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. I.R. Johnson, E.S. Pietri, F. Fullilove, S. Mowrer, Exploring identity-safety cues and allyship among Black women students in STEM environments. Psychol. Women Q. 43, 131–150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319830926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Lockwood, “Someone like me can be successful”: Do college students need same-gender role models? Psychol. Women Q. 30, 36–46 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00260.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Lockwood, Z. Kunda, Increasing the salience of one’s best selves can undermine inspiration by outstanding role models. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 214–228 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T.D. Kemper, Reference groups, socialization and achievement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 33, 31–45 (1968). https://doi.org/10.2307/2092238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H.R. Markus, S. Kitayama, Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. B. Magerko, J. Freeman, T. McKlin, S. McCoid, T. Jenkins, E. Livingston, Tackling engagement in computing with computational music remixing, in Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, (ACM, 2013), pp. 657–662

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. H.R. Markus, S. Kitayama, Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 420–430 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610375557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Markus, P. Nurius, Possible selves. Am. Psychol. 41, 954–969 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Morgenroth, M.K. Ryan, K. Peters, The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19, 465–483 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M.C. Murphy, C.M. Steele, J.J. Gross, Signaling threat how situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychol. Sci. 18, 879–885 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Nagengast, H.W. Marsh, L.F. Scalas, M.K. Xu, K.T. Hau, U. Trautwein, Who took the “x” out of expectancy–value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1058–1066 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611415540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. National Science Board, Science and Engineering Indicators 2016 (National Science Foundation, NSB-2016-1, 2016, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2015). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2015.. Special Report NSF 15-311. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/

    Google Scholar 

  29. B.A. Nosek, F.L. Smyth, J.J. Hansen, T. Devos, N.M. Lindner, K.A. Ranganath, et al., Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 18, 36–88 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S.E. Page, Making the difference: Applying a logic of diversity. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 21, 6–20 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. E. Paice, S. Heard, F. Moss, How important are role models in making good doctors? BMJ: Br. Med. J. 325, 707–710 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.325.7366.707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. E.S. Pietri, M.L. Drawbaugh, A.N. Lewis, I.R. Johnson, Who encourages Latina women to feel a sense of identity-safety in STEM? J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 84 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103827

  33. E.S. Pietri, I.R. Johnson, E. Ozgumus, One size may not fit all: Exploring how the intersection of race and gender and stigma consciousness predict effective identity-safe cues for Black women. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 74, 291–306 (2018a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. E.S. Pietri, I.R. Johnson, E. Ozgumus, A.I. Young, Maybe she is relatable: Increasing women’s awareness of gender bias encourages their identification with women scientists. Psychol. Women Q. 42, 192–219 (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317752643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(2012). , Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-executive-reportfinal_2-13-12.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  36. V. Purdie-Vaughns, C.M. Steele, P.G. Davies, R. Diltmann, J.R. Crosby, Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 615–630 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. U. Schiefele, Interest and learning from text. Sci. Stud. Read. 3, 257–279 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. T. Schmader, B. Major, The impact of ingroup vs outgroup performance on personal values. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35, 47–67 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. I.H. Settles, When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 30, 487–500 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. L.R. Tropp, S.C. Wright, Ingroup identification as the inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 585–600 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201275007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. G.M. Walton, G.L. Cohen, A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 82–96 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. G.M. Walton, G.L. Cohen, A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science 331, 1447–1451 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. White House Briefing (2017). Expanding Access to High Quality STEM and Computer Science Education Provides More Pathways to Good Jobs. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefingsstatements/expanding-access-high-quality-stem-computer-science-education-provides-pathways-goodjobs/

    Google Scholar 

  45. E. Wiebe, L. Williams, J. Petlick, N. Nagappan, S. Balik, C. Miller, M. Ferzli, Pair programming in introductory programming labs, in Proceedings Submitted to American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  46. L. Williams, E. Wiebe, K. Yang, M. Ferzli, C. Miller, In support of paired programming in the introductory computer science course. Comput. Sci. Educ. 12, 197–212 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. J.G. Stout, N. Dasgupta, M. Hunsinger, M.A. McManus, STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). J Pers Soc Psychol 100, 255–270 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  48. C.M. Guarino, Faculty service loads and gender: are women taking care of the academic family? Res High Educ 23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by an IUPUI STEM Education Innovation and Research Institute (SEIRI) SSG grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Evava Pietri & Leslie Ashburn-Nardo

  2. Department of Computer and Information Science, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Snehasis Mukhopadhyay

Authors
  1. Evava Pietri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leslie Ashburn-Nardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Snehasis Mukhopadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evava Pietri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Hamid R. Arabnia

  2. School of Computing and Data Sciences, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA

    Leonidas Deligiannidis

  3. Facultad de Informática - CIC PBA, National University of La Plata, La Plata, Argentina

    Fernando G. Tinetti

  4. Department of Computer Science, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA, USA

    Quoc-Nam Tran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pietri, E., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Mukhopadhyay, S. (2021). Peer Assistant Role Models in a Graduate Computer Science Course. In: Arabnia, H.R., Deligiannidis, L., Tinetti, F.G., Tran, QN. (eds) Advances in Software Engineering, Education, and e-Learning. Transactions on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70873-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70873-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70872-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70873-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation