Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 60))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

This introductory chapter provides a brief overview of policy networks in terms of the formality of ties developed among policy actors in environmental conflict resolution processes and explains the main goals and the theoretical and methodological significance of the studies included in this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahn, T. K., Esarey, J., & Scholz, J. T. (2009). Reputation and cooperation in voluntary exchange: Comparing local and central institutions. Journal of Politics, 71(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, S. A., & Carr, J. B. (2012). Mitigating uncertainty and risk in planning for regional preparedness: The role of bonding and bridging relationships. Urban Studies, 40(4), 709–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berardo, R. (2009). Processing complexity in networks: A study of informal collaboration and its effect on organizational success. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 521–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, F. S., Brower, R. S., Choi, S. O., Goa, W. X., Jang, H., Kwon, M., & Word, J. (2004). Three traditions of network research: What the public management research agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, L. B. (2009). Collaborative governance: Emerging practices and the incomplete legal framework for public and stakeholder voice. Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2009(2), 269–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, L. B., Fairman, D., Fiorino, D. J., & O’Leary, R. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of environmental conflict resolution. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1955). Dynamics of bureaucracy: A study of interpersonal relations in two government agencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, E., & Raynaud, E. (2006). The economics of private institutions: An introduction to the dynamics of institutional frameworks and to the analysis of multilevel multi-type governance. Working Paper. (Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=920225 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.920225)

  • Caiani, M. (2014). Social network analysis. In D. Porta (Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., & McAdam, D. (Eds.). (2003). Social movements and networks: Relational approaches to collective action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isett, K. R., & Provan, K. G. (2005). The evolution of dyadic interorganizational relationships in a network of publicly funded nonprofit agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isett, K. R., Mergel, I. A., LeRoux, K., Mischen, P. A., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2011). Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 1), i157–i173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, C. (2012). Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts, and findings. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundation of a network approach to governance. Public Management Review, 2(2), 135–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koliba, C., Meek, J. W., & Zia, A. (2011). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. New York: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract: An inquiry into modern contractual relations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkoff, S. L. (2013). From competition to cooperation: A dyadic approach to interlocal agreements. American Politics Research, 41(2), 261–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, R., Nabatchi, T., & Bingham, L. B. (2004). Environmental conflict resolution. In R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1994). Networks and economic life. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prell, C. (2012). Social network analysis: History, theory & methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raab, J., & Kenis, P. (2009). Heading toward a society of networks: Empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18(3), 198–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G., Bates, L., & Pattison, P. (2011). Network governance and environmental management: Conflict and cooperation. Public Administration, 89(4), 1293–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (Ed.). (1993). Games in hierarchies and networks. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, M. K. (2010). Do risk profiles of services alter contractual patterns? A comparison across multiple metropolitan services. In R. C. Feiock & J. T. Scholz (Eds.), Self-organizing federalism: Collaborative mechanisms to mitigate institutional collective action dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waarden, F. V. (1992). Dimensions of types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ysa, T., & Esteve, M. (2011). Assessing public networks: Proposal for a new unit of analysis. In S. Groeneveld & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), New steering concepts in public management. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lim, S. (2021). Introduction. In: Policy Network Ties in the Dynamic Process of Environmental Conflict Resolution. Environment & Policy, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70855-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70855-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70854-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70855-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics