Abstract
ICTs are an indispensable part of many families’ everyday life, not only for family management but also for maintaining family intimacy. Yet, we know little about the everyday practices of using ICTs for family work. How do contemporary Swedish families use ICTs to support family intimacy? We investigate how particular social needs for family intimacy lead to creative forms of technology adaptation and use. We conducted interviews with six, Swedish families, living in different households, cities, and even countries. Our results detail three main distances—spatiotemporal, generational, and embodied—that people experience in their family life. We conclude that bridging distances requires doing digital intimate family work; i.e. families find ways of translating or recreating intimate family settings, situations, and interactions into digital contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion (New York: Routledge).
Andreassen, C. S., Pallesen, S. and Griffiths, M. D. (2017) ‘The Relationship Between Addictive Use of Social Media, Narcissism, and Self-esteem: Findings from a Large National Survey’, Addictive Behaviors, 64, 287–93.
Aspers, P. (2001) Markets in Fashion: A Phenomenological Approach (Stockholm: City University Press).
Baym, K. N. (2010) Personal Connections in the Digital Age (Cambridge: Polity).
Berlant, L. (1998) ‘Intimacy: A Special Issue’, Critical Inquiry 24 (2), 281–8.
Bilbao-Osorio, B., Soumitra, D. and Lanvin, B. (2013) The Global Information Technology Report 2013 (Geneva: World Economic Forum).
Boneva, B. and Kraut, R. (2005) ‘Email, Gender, and Personal Relationships’, in Haythornthwaite, C. A. and Wellman, B. (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life (Malden, MA: Blackwell), pp. 372–403.
Broadbent, S. 2016. Intimacy at Work: How Digital Media Bring Private Life to the Workplace (Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press).
Chudnovskaya, M. and Kolk, M. (2017) ‘Educational Expansion and Intergenerational Proximity in Sweden’, Population, Space, and Place, 23 (1), e1973.
Denzin, N. K. (ed.) (1972) Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook (Chicago: Aldine).
Di Leonardo, M. (1987) ‘The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families, and the Work of Kinship’, Signs, 12 (3), 440–453.
Eklund, L., von Essen, E., Jonsson, F. and Johansson, M. (2018) ‘To Be or Not to Be on the Internet: Unpacking Online Anonymity’, Stockholm Internet Research Group Working Paper Series, SIRR2018_1.
Eisler, R., Donnelly, G. and Montuori, A. (2016) ‘Creativity, Society, and Gender: Contextualizing and Redefining Creativity’, Interdisciplinary Journal of Partnership Studies 3 (2), Article 3.
Findahl, O. (2017) Swedes and Internet 2017 (Gävle: Wii).
Giddens, A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformations of Intimacy (Cambridge: Polity).
Goldscheider, F. (2000) ‘Men, Children and the Future of the Family in the Third Millennium’, Futures, 32, 525–38.
Hayes, N. (2000) Doing Psychological Research (Buckingham: Open University Press).
Haythornthwaite, C. and Wellman, B. (2002) The Internet in Everyday Life (Oxford: Blackwell).
Kothari, C. R. (2004) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (New Age International).
Krasnova, H. et al. (2017) ‘Why Men and Women Continue to Use Social Networking Sites: The Role of Gender Differences’, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26 (4), 261–84.
Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2009) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research (Los Angeles: Sage).
Lasén, A. and Casado, E. (2012) ‘Mobile Telephony and the Remediation of Couple Intimacy’, Feminist Media Studies, 12 (4), 550–59.
Levina, M. (2012) ‘Our Data, Ourselves: Feminist Narratives of Empowerment in Health 2.0 Discourse’, in Gajjala, R. and Oh, Y. J. (eds) Cyberfeminism (New York: Peter Lang), pp. 13–29.
Licoppe, C. (2004) ‘Connected Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape’, Environment and Planning D: Society and space, 22 (1), 135–56.
Livingstone, S. (2008) ‘Taking Risky Opportunities in Youthful Content Creation: Teenagers’ Use of Social Networking Sites for Intimacy, Privacy and Self-expression’, New Media & Society, 10 (3), 393–411.
Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. H. (1995) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observations and Analysis (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).
Lüscher, K. (2002) ‘Generationenbeziehungen’, in Endruweit, G. and Trommsdorff, G. (eds) Wörterbuch der Soziologie (Stuttgart: E. Ulmer), pp. 141–43.
Meßmer, A.-K., Schmidbaur, M. and P.-I. Villa (2014) ‘Intimitäten - Wie Politisch ist das Vertraute?’, Feministische Studien, 1, 3–8.
Morgan, D. H. J. (1996) Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies (Cambridge: Wiley).
Nave-Herz, R. (2002) ‘Familiensoziologie’, in Endruweit, G. and Trommsdorff, G. (eds) Wörterbuch der Soziologie (Stuttgart: E. Ulmer), pp. 148–52.
Ohlsson-Wijk, S., Turunen, J. and Andersson, G. (2017) Family Forerunners? An Overview of Family Demographic Change in Sweden, Stockholm Research Reports in Demography 2017, (13).
Rosa, H. (2015) Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity (New York: Columbia University Press).
Schier, M. and Jurczyk, K. (2008) ‘Familie als Herstellungsleistung in Zeiten der Entgrenzung’, Sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformationsdienst soFid, 9–18.
Silva, E. B. and Smart, C. (2004) ‘The “New” Practices and Politics of Family Life’, in Silva, E. B. and Smart, C. (eds) The New Family? (London: Sage), pp. 1–12.
Smart, C. (2006) ‘Intimacy’, in Turner, B. S. (ed) The Cambridge Dictionary of Sociology (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press), p. 308.
Stempfhuber, M. (2014) ‘Limited Intimacy? Die Mediale Herstellung von Intimität am Beispiel von Grindr’, Feministische Studien, 1, 49–62.
Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other (New York: Basic Books).
Wajcman, J., Bittman, M. and Brown, J. E. (2009) ‘Intimate Connections: The Impact of the Mobile Phone on Work/Life Boundaries’, in Goggin, G. and Hjorth, L. (eds) Mobile Technologies: From Telecommunications to Media (New York: Routledge), pp. 9–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sadowski, H., Eklund, L. (2021). Creative Forms of Family Intimacy: Managing Family Bonds Across Distances. In: Mikats, J., Kink-Hampersberger, S., Oates-Indruchová, L. (eds) Creative Families. Palgrave Studies in Mediating Kinship, Representation, and Difference. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70803-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70803-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70802-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70803-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)