Skip to main content

Recent Advances in SQUID Magnetometry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Magnetic Measurement Techniques for Materials Characterization

Abstract

This chapter aims to provide a contemporary overview of Superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)-based magnetometry. As there are many existing, and well-written, resources devoted to SQUID-based magnetometry (Clarke and Braginski. The SQUID Handbook Vol. 1: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Sytems, New York: Wiley, 2004, Clarke and Braginski. The SQUID Handbook, Vol. 2: Applications of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems, New York: Wiley, 2004, Fagaly, Rev. Sci. Instrum 77:101101, 2006), the goal of this chapter is to highlight some of the most recent innovations rather than to repeat much of what has already been published. For example, advances in sample transport, magnet technology, and SQUID detection modes have dramatically improved measurement sensitivity and throughput over the past decade. A discussion on techniques to improve measurement accuracy is also provided near the end of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is, in fact, the underlying principle of operation for VSM instruments which do not employ SQUID detection.

  2. 2.

    This is sometimes referred to a “fluxon” and has a value of Φ0 = 2.067 · 10−15 Wb.

  3. 3.

    Generally, the system will choose the state which satisfies the quantization condition and requires the least amount of screening current. For this example, while \( {I}_S=-0.75\frac{\Phi_0}{L} \) also satisfies the condition with n = 0, this state requires \( \Delta U=\frac{1}{2}L\left({0.75}^2-{0.25}^2\right){\left(\frac{\Phi_0}{L}\right)}^2=0.25\frac{\Phi_0^2}{L} \) more energy and so is not “preferred.”

  4. 4.

    Though not denoted explicitly in the figures here, it should be mentioned that the bias current is itself modulated (typically at frequencies of a few 100 s of kHz) with some small additional amplitude. This permits lock-in detection of the associated voltage drop across the SQUID junctions, increasing the overall signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement.

References

  1. J. Clarke, A. Braginski (eds.), the SQUID Handbook Vol. 1: Fundamentals and Technology of SQUIDs and SQUID Sytems (Wiley, New York, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Clarke, A. Braginski (eds.), The SQUID Handbook, Vol. 2: Applications of SQUIDs and SQUID Systems (Wiley, New York, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Fagaly, Superconducting quantum interference device instruments and applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 101101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. F. London, On the problem of the molecular theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 74(5), 562–573 (1948)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T.K. Hunt, J.E. Mercereau, Fluxoid conservation by superconducting thin film rings. Phys. Rev. 135(4A), A944–A950 (1964)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Orlando, 6.763 applied superconductivity, in Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Hurt, S. Li, A. Amann, Versatile SQUID Susceptometer with multiple measurement modes. IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 3541 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Diederichs, A. Amann and M. Simmonds, Superconducting QuickSwitch. United States of America Patent 8,134,434, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Stamenov, J. Coey, Sample size, position, and structure effects on magnetization measurements using second-order gradiometer pickup coils. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 015106 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hayden, V. Lambinet, S. Gomis, G. Gries, Note: Evaluation of magnetometry data acquired from elongated samples. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 056106 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Andreas Amann for fruitful discussions and careful reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randy K. Dumas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dumas, R.K., Hogan, T. (2021). Recent Advances in SQUID Magnetometry. In: Franco, V., Dodrill, B. (eds) Magnetic Measurement Techniques for Materials Characterization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70443-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics