Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using the Ottawa Model of Research Use to Discuss HTA Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Development and Implementation of Health Technology Assessment

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 438 Accesses

Abstract

The discussion of the qualitative and quantitative results, guided by the Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU) theoretical framework, is provided in this Chapter. Each element of the model is discussed separately. First, elements related to the external environment, that could influence practitioners, researchers, and policymakers, such as external pressures are discussed in the first element. Second, the analysis of potential adopters stimulates the dialogue related to the knowledge and the perception of potential stakeholders, to identify barriers and enables that could have an impact on the diffusion of Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Third, features of the evidence-based innovation are discussed. Fourth, a description of the different transfer strategies adopted along with the implementation intervention is provided. Fifth, the results achieved are presented in the pillar related to the analysis of the adoption and use of the innovation. Sixth, in the Outcome pillar, a model that considers the results emerged from the previous elements and that can be adopted for the monitoring of the factors that can have an impact on the diffusion of HTA is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarons G, Sawitzky A (2006) Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychol Serv 3(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2014.371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auston I, Cahn MA, Selden CR (1992) Literature search methods for the development of clinical practice guidelines. NICHSR

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker R et al (2015) Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice

    Google Scholar 

  • Banta D (2003) The development of health technology assessment. Health Policy 63(2):121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00059-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basinski AS (1995) Evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 153(11):1575

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista R (1992) Health care technology assessment: linking science and policy-making. Can Med Assoc J 146(4):461

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista R, Hodge M (1999) The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. CMAJ 160(10):1464–1467

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista R, Hodge M (2009) The natural history of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(S1):281–284. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646230909076X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battista R, Mickalide AD (1990) Integration of preventive services into primary care: a conceptual framework for implementation. In: Preventing disease. Springer, New York, pp 467–473

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boan D, Funderburk F (2003) Healthcare quality improvement and organizational culture, vol 5. Delmarva Foundation, Easton, MD, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodeau-Livinec F et al (2006) Impact of CEDIT recommendations: an example of health technology assessment in a hospital network. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22(2):161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JB, Shye D, McFarland B (1995) The paradox of guideline implementation: how AHCPR’s depression guideline was adapted at Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region. Jt Comm Qual Improv 21(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champagne F, Lemieux-Charles L (2004) Using knowledge and evidence in health care: multidisciplinary perspectives. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chootipongchaivat S et al (2017) Conducive factors to the development of health technology assessment in Asia. F1000Research 6:529

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy M, Shannon W (1995) Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 45(396):371–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran GM et al (2012) Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care 50(3):217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damschroder LJ et al (2009) Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 4(1):50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A (1997) Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 157(4):408–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (1995) Management for doctors: conflict, power, negotiation. BMJ 310(6972):104–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers L, Jensen MB (2012) Attitudes and barriers toward mini-HTA in the Danish municipalities. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28(3):271–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers L et al (2006) Doing mini-health technology assessments in hospitals: a new concept of decision support in health care? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 22(3):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462306051178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elson RB, Connelly DP (1995) Computerized patient records in primary care. Their role in mediating guideline-driven physician behavior change. Arch Fam Med 4(8):698–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EUnetHTA (2008) Handbook on HTA capacity building, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk SG et al (1991) BARRIERS: the barriers to research utilization scale. Appl Nurs Res 4(1):39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk SG, Tornquist EM, Champagne MT (1995) Barriers and facilitators of research utilization. Nurs Clin N Am 30(3):395–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon M-P (2012) Promotion de l’efficience dans le processus décisionnel en milieu hospitalier à l’aide de l’évaluation des technologies de la santé. Fondation canadienne de la recherche sur les services de santé

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile DA et al (2004) Well-child visits in the video age: pediatricians and the American Academy of Pediatrics’ guidelines for children’s media use. Pediatrics 114(5):1235–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales R et al (2012) Increasing the translation of evidence into practice, policy, and public health improvements: a framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science. Acad Med 87(3):271–278. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182449d33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham ID (1997) Episiotomy: challenging obstetric interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham ID, Logan J (1998) Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Sci Commun 20(2):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham ID, Logan J (2004a) Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care. Can J Nurs Res 36(2):89–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham I, Logan J (2004b) Ottawa model of research use: a framework for adopting innovations relevance for public health implementing the tool steps for using tool. Can J Nurs Res 36(2): 89–103. Available at http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/65

  • Graham ID et al (2006) Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof 26(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM (1993) Changing physicians’ practices. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199310213291714

  • Greer AL (1988) The state of the art versus the state of the science: the diffusion of new medical technologies into practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 4(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli R, Lomas J (1994) Evaluating the message: the relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Med Care 32:202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw JM et al (2006) Is the involvement of opinion leaders in the implementation of research findings a feasible strategy? Implement Sci 1(1):3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grol R (1992) Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Qual Health Care 1(3):184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grol R (1993) Development of guidelines for general practice care. Br J Gen Pract 43(369):146–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Grol RPTM et al (2007) Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q 85(1):93–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00478.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailey D (2003) Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halmesmäki E, Pasternack I, Roine R (2016) Hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) in Finland: a case study on collaboration between hospitals and the national HTA unit. Health Res Policy Syst 14(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0095-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RB (1993) Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 703:210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward RS, Laupacis A (1993) Initiating, conducting and maintaining guidelines development programs. CMAJ 148(4):507

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodnett ED et al (1996) A strategy to promote research-based nursing care: effects on childbirth outcomes. Res Nurs Health 19(1):13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan DL, Logan JO (2004) The Ottawa model of research use: a guide to clinical innovation in the NICU. Clin Nurs Special 18(5):255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm HA (1998) Quality issues in continuing medical education. BMJ 316:621–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kajermo KN et al (2000) Perceptions of research utilization: comparisons between health care professionals, nursing students and a reference group of nurse clinicians. J Adv Nurs 31(1):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaló Z et al (2016) HTA implementation roadmap in central and eastern European countries. Health Econ 25:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne AM et al (2007) Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci 2(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen FB (2007) What is health technology assessment-and how is European Network for HTA (EUnetHTA) developing transnational collaboration

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchenbecker R, Polanczyk CA (2012) Institutionalizing health technology assessment in Brazil: challenges ahead. Value Health Reg Issues 1(2):257–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2012.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leelahavarong P, Doungthipsirikul S, Kumluang S (2019) Health technology assessment in Thailand: institutionalization and contribution to healthcare decision making: review of literature. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25:241

    Google Scholar 

  • Li R et al (2017) Evidence-informed capacity building for setting health priorities in low- and middle-income countries: a framework and recommendations for further research. F1000Research 6(0):231. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.10966.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO (2013) Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One 8(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077404.

  • Logan JO, Graham ID (1998) Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Sci Commun 20(2):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan J, Graham ID (2010) The Ottawa model of research use. In: Models and frameworks for implementating evidence-based practice: evidence to action. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomas J (1997) Improving research dissemination and uptake in the health sector: beyond the sound of one hand clapping. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Hamilton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann KV (1994) Educating medical students: lessons from research in continuing education. Acad Med 69(1):41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh K et al (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making—emerging good practices: report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force. Value Health 19(2):125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martelli N et al (2017) Hospital-based health technology assessment in France: a focus on medical devices. Therapie 72(1):115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2017.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam SB (1996) Updating our knowledge of adult learning. J Contin Educ Health Prof 16(3):136–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moharra M et al. (2008) Survey report on HTA organisations Espallargues M on behalf of Work Package 8, EUnetHTA project, Work Package Catalan Health Service. Department of Health. Autonomous Government of Catalonia. Catalan Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Research (CAHTA), 8. Available at http://www.eunethta.eu/sites/default/files/sites/5026.fedimbo.belgium.be/files/Survey report on HTA organisations.pdf. Accessed 25 October 2017

  • Moharra M et al (2017) Systems to support health technology assessment ( HTA ) in Member States of the European Union with limited institutionalization of HTA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2(2009):75–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462309990717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton S, Seditas K (2018) Evidence synthesis for knowledge exchange: balancing responsiveness and quality in providing evidence for policy and practice. Evid Policy 14(1):155–167. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14779388510327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan MT et al (1994) A review of approaches to integrating research and practice. Appl Nurs Res 7(4):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman GT, Schmidt HG (1992) The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med 67(9):557–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oortwijn W et al (2017) Towards integrated health technology assessment for improving decision making in selected countries. Value Health 20(8):1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örtenblad A (2002) A typology of the idea of learning organization. Manag Learn 33(2):213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ovretveit J (2004) The leaders role in quality and safety improvement, Stockholm: Association of County Councils (Lanstingsforbundet) (June). Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.505.8511&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Powell BJ et al (2012) A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev 69(2):123–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558711430690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska JO, Velicer WF (1997) The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promotion 12(1):38–48. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor E et al (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Admin Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 38(2):65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC (2013) Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci 8(1):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan A, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea II, Moharra M (2011) Addressing issues in health technology assessment promotion: motives, enablers, and barriers. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462310001352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2010) Diffusion of innovations. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2012) Diffusion of innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. In: Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation. Springer, New York, pp 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79868-9_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saltman R, Busse R, Figueras J (2006) Decentralization in health care: strategies and outcomes. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro-Colom L, Martin J (2017) Hospital-based health technology assessment: the next frontier for health technology assessment. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro-Colom L et al (2012) Development and test of a decision support tool for hospital health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28(4):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampietro-Colom L et al. (2015) The AdHopHTA handbook

    Google Scholar 

  • Schardt C et al (2004) What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 180(6 Suppl):S57. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (2010) Organizational culture and leadership. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott T et al (2003a) Does organisational culture influence health care performance? A review of the evidence. J Health Serv Res Policy 8(2):105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott TIM et al (2003b) Implementing culture change in health care: theory and practice. IntJ Qual Health Care 15(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffman RN, Greenes RA (1994) Improving clinical guidelines with logic and decision-table techniques: application to hepatitis immunization recommendations. Med Decis Making 14(3):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shortell SM, Bennett CL, Byck GR (1998) Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement on clinical practice: what it will take to accelerate progress. Milbank Q 76(4):593–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J (2008) Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI series. Implement Sci 3(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock GN, McDermott CM (2001) Organizational and strategic predictors of manufacturing technology implementation success: an exploratory study. Technovation 21(10):625–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stross JK (1996) The educationally influential physician. J Contin Educ Health Prof 16(3):167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ (1982) Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 1:28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente TW, Davis RL (1999) Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 566(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valente TW, Pumpuang P (2007) Identifying opinion leaders to promote behavior change. Health Educ Behav 34(6):881–896. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198106297855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Velden T et al (2010) Continuing medical education in Vietnam: new legislation and new roles for medical schools. J Contin Educ Health Prof 30(2):144–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner EH (2000) The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 320(7234):569–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczak JR et al (1994) A survey of research-related activities and perceived barriers to research utilization among professional oncology nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum 21:710–715

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) Factors conducive to the development of health technology assessment in Asia, 4(2)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    Valentina Beretta

Authors
  1. Valentina Beretta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beretta, V. (2021). Using the Ottawa Model of Research Use to Discuss HTA Development. In: Development and Implementation of Health Technology Assessment . Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70308-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation