Skip to main content

Numerical Comparison of Offline Motion-Cueing Algorithms for the Ride Simulator RoboCoaster and Auto-tuning Parameters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Material, Machines and Methods for Sustainable Development (MMMS2020) (MMMS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 946 Accesses

Abstract

Motion cueing algorithms (MCAs) are the cheating technique to drive physical simulators along offline-generated trajectories such as to produce proper motion cues to the passenger by a combination of tilt gravity and translational acceleration components (so-called linear specific forces or “g-forces”). In this paper, the numerical perception quality of the aforementioned families of MCAs is compared for a virtual test ride along a simple S-shaped planar curve featuring solely lateral accelerations, using two previously published objective measures. To this end, the MCAs were implemented using originally published MCA parameter values and optimally tuned values concerning the test trajectory. The comparison shows large discrepancies between the different MCAs, both in terms of simulated motion perception and fulfillment of robot workspace constraints. The best-fit tuning of MCA parameters for a given trajectory may significantly improve the objective measures. In this study, a new auto-tuning method based on a generic optimal method called mean variance mapping optimization to minimize the performance indicator was introduced to find the off-line optimal algorithm’s tuned parameters. Three testbeds using the auto-tuning process show different tuned parameter sets, however, the off-line optimal MCA has a similar response with all set of tuned parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Augusto, B., Loureiro, R.: Motion cueing in the chalmers driving simulator: a model predictive control approach. Master’s thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baseggio, M., Beghi, A., Bruschetta, M., Maran, F., Minen, D.: An MPC approach to the design of motion cueing algorithms for driving simulators. In: 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 692–697. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellmann, T., Heindl, J., Hellerer, M., Kuchar, R., Sharma, K., Hirzinger, G.: The DLR robot motion simulator. Part I: design and setup. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4694–4701 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borah, J., Young, L.R., Curry, R.E.: Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 545(1), 51–73 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Erlich, I., Venayagamoorthy, G.K., Worawat, N.: A mean-variance optimization algorithm. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, WCCI 2010, pp. 1–6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fang, Z., Kemeny, A.: Motion cueing algorithms for a real-time automobile driving simulator. In: Driving Simulation Conference, pp. 159–174 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giordano, P.R., Masone, C., Tesch, J., Breidt, M., Pollini, L., Bülthoff, H.H.: A novel framework for closed-loop robotic motion simulation. Part II: motion cueing design and experimental validation. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3896–3903. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nahon, M.A., Reid, L.D.: Simulator motion-drive algorithms—a designer’s perspective. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 13(2), 356–362 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parrish, R.V., Dieudonne, J.E., Martin Jr., D.J.: Coordinated adaptive washout for motion simulators. J. Aircr. 12(1), 44–50 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pekar, J., Havlena, V.: Design and analysis of model predictive control using MPT toolbox (2004). https://dsp.vscht.cz/konferencematlab/matlab04/pekar.pdf

  11. Pouliot, N.A., Gosselin, C.M., Nahon, M.A.: Motion simulation capabilities of three-degree-of-freedom flight simulators. J. Aircr. 35(1), 9–17 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reid, L.D., Nahon, M.A.: Flight simulation motion-base drive algorithms. Part 1: developing and testing the equations. Tech. rep. (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schweig, S., Kammers, H.: Bewegungssteuerung eines RoboCoaster Kuka Roboters zur Ride Simulation mit Hilfe von Washout Filtern. University of Duisburg Essen, Duisburg, Germany, Project Report (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sivan, R., Ish-Shalom, J., Huang, J.K.: An optimal control approach to the design of moving flight simulators. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 12(6), 818–827 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Telban, R.J., Cardullo, F.M., Houck, J.A.: Motion cueing algorithm development: human-centered linear and nonlinear approaches. NASA/CR2005-213747, Tech. rep. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zywiol, H.J., Romano, R.: Motion drive algorithms and simulator design to study motion effects on infantry soldiers. In: Driving Simulation Conference, North America 2003 (DSC-NA 2003) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research is funded by the Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under project number T2020-SAHEP-013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duc-An Pham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pham, DA. (2021). Numerical Comparison of Offline Motion-Cueing Algorithms for the Ride Simulator RoboCoaster and Auto-tuning Parameters. In: Long, B.T., Kim, YH., Ishizaki, K., Toan, N.D., Parinov, I.A., Vu, N.P. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Material, Machines and Methods for Sustainable Development (MMMS2020). MMMS 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69610-8_127

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69610-8_127

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69609-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69610-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics