Abstract
Motion cueing algorithms (MCAs) are the cheating technique to drive physical simulators along offline-generated trajectories such as to produce proper motion cues to the passenger by a combination of tilt gravity and translational acceleration components (so-called linear specific forces or “g-forces”). In this paper, the numerical perception quality of the aforementioned families of MCAs is compared for a virtual test ride along a simple S-shaped planar curve featuring solely lateral accelerations, using two previously published objective measures. To this end, the MCAs were implemented using originally published MCA parameter values and optimally tuned values concerning the test trajectory. The comparison shows large discrepancies between the different MCAs, both in terms of simulated motion perception and fulfillment of robot workspace constraints. The best-fit tuning of MCA parameters for a given trajectory may significantly improve the objective measures. In this study, a new auto-tuning method based on a generic optimal method called mean variance mapping optimization to minimize the performance indicator was introduced to find the off-line optimal algorithm’s tuned parameters. Three testbeds using the auto-tuning process show different tuned parameter sets, however, the off-line optimal MCA has a similar response with all set of tuned parameters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Augusto, B., Loureiro, R.: Motion cueing in the chalmers driving simulator: a model predictive control approach. Master’s thesis, Chalmers University of Technology (2009)
Baseggio, M., Beghi, A., Bruschetta, M., Maran, F., Minen, D.: An MPC approach to the design of motion cueing algorithms for driving simulators. In: 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 692–697. IEEE (2011)
Bellmann, T., Heindl, J., Hellerer, M., Kuchar, R., Sharma, K., Hirzinger, G.: The DLR robot motion simulator. Part I: design and setup. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4694–4701 (2011)
Borah, J., Young, L.R., Curry, R.E.: Optimal estimator model for human spatial orientation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 545(1), 51–73 (1988)
Erlich, I., Venayagamoorthy, G.K., Worawat, N.: A mean-variance optimization algorithm. In: IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, WCCI 2010, pp. 1–6 (2010)
Fang, Z., Kemeny, A.: Motion cueing algorithms for a real-time automobile driving simulator. In: Driving Simulation Conference, pp. 159–174 (2012)
Giordano, P.R., Masone, C., Tesch, J., Breidt, M., Pollini, L., Bülthoff, H.H.: A novel framework for closed-loop robotic motion simulation. Part II: motion cueing design and experimental validation. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3896–3903. IEEE (2010)
Nahon, M.A., Reid, L.D.: Simulator motion-drive algorithms—a designer’s perspective. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 13(2), 356–362 (1990)
Parrish, R.V., Dieudonne, J.E., Martin Jr., D.J.: Coordinated adaptive washout for motion simulators. J. Aircr. 12(1), 44–50 (1975)
Pekar, J., Havlena, V.: Design and analysis of model predictive control using MPT toolbox (2004). https://dsp.vscht.cz/konferencematlab/matlab04/pekar.pdf
Pouliot, N.A., Gosselin, C.M., Nahon, M.A.: Motion simulation capabilities of three-degree-of-freedom flight simulators. J. Aircr. 35(1), 9–17 (1998)
Reid, L.D., Nahon, M.A.: Flight simulation motion-base drive algorithms. Part 1: developing and testing the equations. Tech. rep. (1985)
Schweig, S., Kammers, H.: Bewegungssteuerung eines RoboCoaster Kuka Roboters zur Ride Simulation mit Hilfe von Washout Filtern. University of Duisburg Essen, Duisburg, Germany, Project Report (2011)
Sivan, R., Ish-Shalom, J., Huang, J.K.: An optimal control approach to the design of moving flight simulators. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 12(6), 818–827 (1982)
Telban, R.J., Cardullo, F.M., Houck, J.A.: Motion cueing algorithm development: human-centered linear and nonlinear approaches. NASA/CR2005-213747, Tech. rep. (2005)
Zywiol, H.J., Romano, R.: Motion drive algorithms and simulator design to study motion effects on infantry soldiers. In: Driving Simulation Conference, North America 2003 (DSC-NA 2003) (2003)
Acknowledgement
This research is funded by the Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) under project number T2020-SAHEP-013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pham, DA. (2021). Numerical Comparison of Offline Motion-Cueing Algorithms for the Ride Simulator RoboCoaster and Auto-tuning Parameters. In: Long, B.T., Kim, YH., Ishizaki, K., Toan, N.D., Parinov, I.A., Vu, N.P. (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd Annual International Conference on Material, Machines and Methods for Sustainable Development (MMMS2020). MMMS 2020. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69610-8_127
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69610-8_127
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69609-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69610-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)