Abstract
This chapter takes a “jet plane” and “helicopter” approach to understanding implications of Netflix’s foray into original content production in South Africa. The chapter argues that bringing together critical political economy, associated with a “jet plane” view, and critical media industry studies, associated with a “helicopter” view, offers a fuller understanding of what Netflix’s manoeuvres mean for South African television industry. The chapter further argues that coloniality needs to be accounted for when analysing Netflix’s entry into Africa. Combining critical political economy and critical media industry approaches helps account for coloniality at macro-, meso-, and micro-level. Netflix is a relatively new entry in South African television market and little study has gone into implications of its entry. Newspaper articles about Netflix’s activities in South Africa provide data that is used for this analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Exchange rate of USD1 to R15.38 applied on 23 November 2020.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Black Economic Empowerment.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
References
Biltereyst, Daniel, and Philippe Meers. 2000. The international telenovela debate and the contra-flow argument: A reappraisal. Media, Culture & Society 22, (4): 393–413.
Burroughs, Benjamin. 2019. House of Netflix: Streaming media and digital lore. Popular Communication 17, (1): 1–17.
Chiumbu, Sarah H., and Mandla Radebe. 2020. Towards a decolonial critical political economy of the media: Some initial thoughts. Communicatio 46, (1): 1–20.
Christian, Aymar Jean. 2019. Expanding production value: The culture and scale of television and new media. Critical Studies in Television 14, (2): 255–267.
Chuma, Wallace. 2019. Political economy of the media in Africa. In Media studies: Critical African and decolonial approaches, eds. Sarah H. Chiumbu, and Mehita Iqani. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. 2019. Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media 20, (4): 336–349.
Dovey, Lindiwe. 2018. Entertaining Africans: Creative innovation in the (internet) television space. Media Industries 5, (2): 93–110.
Effiong, Charles. 2018. Dynamics of globalisation and multiculturalism for the sustenance of Nollywood. Journal of Globalization Studies 9, (2): 110–125.
Elkins, Evan. 2019. Algorithmic cosmopolitanism: On the global claims of digital entertainment platforms. Critical Studies in Media Communication 36, (4): 376–389.
Golding, Peter, and Graham Murdock. 2000. Culture, political economy and communications. In Mass media and society, eds. James Curran and Michael Gurevitch, 82–87. London: Arnold.
Hamusokwe, Basil N. 2018. Theoretical perspectives: Towards a Zambian political economy of communication. Communicatio 44, (2): 1–19.
Havens, Timothy, Amanda D. Lotz, and Serra Tinic. 2009. Critical media industry studies: A research approach. Communication, Culture & Critique 2, (2): 234–253.
Iordache, Catalina, Leo Van Audenhove, and Jan Loisen. 2019. Global media flows: A qualitative review of research methods in audio-visual flow studies. International Communication Gazette 81, (6–8): 748–767.
Iqani, Mehita, and Sarah H. Chiumbu. 2019. Decolonising media studies: New knowledges for a global discipline. In Media studies: Critical African and decolonial approaches, eds. Sarah H. Chiumbu and Mehita Iqani, 1–11. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Kokas, Aynne. 2020. Chilling Netflix: Financialization, and the influence of the Chinese market on the American entertainment industry. Information, Communication & Society 23, (3): 407–419.
Kupa, Tsogo. 2020. Queen Sono and Netflix’s future in Africa. https://africasacountry.com/2020/05/queen-sono-and-the-troubling-promise-of-netflixs-future-in-africa. Accessed 1 July 2020.
Kwet, Michael. 2019. Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South. Race & Class 60, (4): 3–26.
Lotz, Amanda D. 2019. Teasing apart television industry disruption: Consequences of meso-level financing practices before and after the US multiplatform era. Media, Culture & Society 41, (7): 923–938.
Madianou, Mirca. 2019. Technocolonialism: Digital innovation and data practices in the humanitarian response to refugee crises. Social Media + Society 5, (3): 1–13.
Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. 2007. On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies 21, (2–3): 240–270.
Mann, Monique, and Angela Daly. 2019. (Big) data and the North-in-South: Australia’s informational imperialism and digital colonialism. Television & New Media 20, (4): 379–395.
Mann, Monique, Angela Daly, Michael Wilson, and Nicolas Suzor. 2018. The limits of (digital) constitutionalism: Exploring the privacy-security (im) balance in Australia. International Communication Gazette 80, (4): 369–384.
Masuku, M. B. 2010. Tying, bundling or packaging of pay television channels: Who benefits-the consumer, service provider or programme content provider? Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 43, (2): 260–272.
McChesney, Robert D. 2004. The problem of the media: US communication politics in the twenty-first century. New York: NYU Press.
Meehan, Eileen R., and Janet Wasko. 2013. In defence of a political economy of the media. Javnost-the Public 20, (1): 39–53.
Milan, Stefania, and Emiliano Treré. 2019. Big data from the South (s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media 20, (4): 319–335.
Ndlovu, Musa. 2003. The South African Broadcasting Corporation’s expansion into Africa: South African media imperialism? Communicatio 29, (1&2): 297–311.
Quijano, Anibal. 2000. Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology 15, (2): 215–232.
Ricaurte, Paola. 2019. Data epistemologies, the coloniality of power, and resistance. Television & New Media 20, (4): 350–365.
Smythe, Dallas W. 1977. Communications: Blindspot of western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 1, (3): 1–27.
Straubhaar, Joseph D. 1991. Beyond media imperialism: Asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Media Communication 8, (1): 39–59.
Straubhaar, Joseph D., Deborah Castro, Luiz Guilherme Duarte, and Jeremiah Spence. 2019. Class, pay TV access and Netflix in Latin America: Transformation within a digital divide. Critical Studies in Television 14, (2): 233–254.
Teer-Tomaselli, Ruth, Keyan Tomaselli, and Mpumelelo Dludla. 2019. Peripheral capital goes global: Naspers, globalisation and global media contraflow. Media, Culture & Society 41, (8): 1142–1159.
Tomlinson, John. 1991. Cultural Imperialism: A Critical Introduction. London: Printer Publisher Ltd.
Wayne, Michael L. 2020. Global streaming platforms and national pay-television markets: A case study of Netflix and multi-channel providers in Israel. The Communication Review 23, (1): 29–45.
Young, Jason C. 2019. The new knowledge politics of digital colonialism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51, (7): 1424–1441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chambwera, C. (2021). Understanding Netflix’s Foray into Original Productions in South Africa: A “Jet Plane” and “Helicopter” View. In: Motsaathebe, G., Chiumbu, S.H. (eds) Television in Africa in the Digital Age. Gender and Cultural Studies in Africa and the Diaspora. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68854-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68854-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68853-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68854-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)