Skip to main content

NATO Political Headquarters, Brussels Belgium

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
NATO in Contemporary Times
  • 429 Accesses

Abstract

First and foremost, NATO is a political organization. Many people fail to realize this and contextually, it is important for readers to know this fact. After all, it is through the political structure and voting by member nations that provides NATO the authority to conduct operations. This chapter explores the national delegations, Nuclear Planning Group, North Atlantic Council, NATO structure, and NATO activities. It then conducts a deeper dive into the Brussels structure, how it obtains funding, political nuances of moving forward (albeit with a compromise), and presents the reader with challenges in actually getting approval for operations especially those not seen as being driven by Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.

Claire Ashcraft is an MPPA student at York College of Pennsylvania and was a contributing researcher to this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AJP-01. 2017. Allied Joint Doctrine. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/905877/20200728-doctrine_nato_allied_joint_doctrine_ajp_01.pdf. Accessed on September 2, 2020.

  • Blakemore, Erin. 2018. When France Pulled the Plug on a Crucial Part of NATO. https://www.history.com/news/france-nato-withdrawal-charles-de-gaulle. Accessed on November 18, 2020.

  • Consensus. n.d. Consensus Decision-Making at NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49178.htm. Accessed on June 14, 2020.

  • Dorff, Robert H. 2014. US National Security Strategy and NATO. Strategy in NATO: Preparing for an Imperfect World. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESCD. n.d. Emerging Security Challenges Division. https://esc.hq.nato.int/default.aspx. Accessed on January 8, 2021.

  • Geoană, Mircea. 2020. NATO 20/2020: 20 bold ideas to reimagine the Alliance after the 2020 US election (Panel Discussion). Atlantic Council Panel. December 11, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Kimberly A. 2009. Justice, Intervention and Force in International Relations: Reassessing Just War Theory for the 21st Century. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, Peter V. 2014. The Indispensable Enabler: NATO’s Strategic Value in High-Intensity Operations Is Far Greater Than You Think. In Strategy in NATO: Preparing for an Imperfect World. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Seth A. 2017. How NATO Adapts: Strategy and Organization in the Atlantic Alliance Since 1950. Baltimore Maryland, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger-Klausen, Villiam, and Liselotte Odgaard. 2014. Preparing for an Imperfect World: Strategy in Conflict Management Environments. In Strategy in NATO: Preparing for an Imperfect World. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasoen, Kenneth. 2016. 185 Years of Belgian Security Service. Journal of Intelligence History 15 (2): 9–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miskimmon, Alister, Ben O’Loughlin, and Laura Roselle. 2011. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations. Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, Hans Henrik. 2014. Effects-Based Thinking in NATO, Utilizing All Instruments of Power While Planning for and Conducting Operations. Strategy. In NATO: Preparing for an Imperfect World. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAC. n.d. North Atlantic Council. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49763.htm. Accessed on June 11, 2020.

  • NATO. 2018. NATO Headquarters. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49284.htm. Accessed on November 20, 2020.

  • NATO. 2020. Deputy Secretary General at CYBERSEC: NATO is adapting to respond to cyber threats.https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_178338.htm. Accessed on November 17, 2020.

  • NATO. n.d. Why Belgium? https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_147162.htm. Accessed on November 11, 2020.

  • NATO Funding. n.d. Funding NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_67655.htm. Accessed on June 14, 2020.

  • NATO Troop Contributions. 2018. Troop Contributions. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_50316.htm. Accessed on November 24, 2020.

  • NPG. n.d. Nuclear Planning Group. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_50069.htm. Accessed on June 11, 2020.

  • Operations and Missions. n.d. Operations and Missions. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_52060.htm. Accessed on June 14, 2020.

  • Shea, Jamie. 2014. NATO’s Future Strategy: Ready for the Threats of the Future or Refighting the Battles of the Past? In Strategy in NATO: Preparing for an Imperfect World. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. 2018a. The 2017 National Security Strategy of the United States. Journal of Strategic Security. 11 (1): 62–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. 2018b. Dissecting the 2017 National Security Strategy: Implications for Senior Administrators (The Devil in the Details). Global Policy. 9 (2): 283–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. 2019. United Nations Security Council Permanent Member Perspectives Implications for U.S. and Global Intelligence Professionals. New York, USA: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. 2020a. Intelligence Dilemmas: Understanding the Complexity of the P5 Relationship (Chapter). In Intelligence Relations in the 21st Century, ed. Tom Røseth and John Weaver. New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. 2020b. National Security Issues Confronting the United States: An Overview (Chapter). In Contemporary Intelligence Analysis and National Security: A Critical American Perspective. New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. Ed. with Jennifer Pomeroy, Ed. 2018. Intelligence Analysis: Unclassified Area and Point Estimates (and Other Intelligence Related Topics), 2nd edn. New York, USA: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. Ed. with Jennifer Y. Pomeroy, Ed. 2019. Global Intelligence Priorities (From the Perspective of the United States). Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. Ed. with Jennifer Pomeroy, Ed. 2020. Contemporary Intelligence Analysis and National Security: A Critical American Perspective. Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, John M. with Benjamin Johnson. 2020. Cyber Security Challenges Confronting Canada and the United States. New York, USA: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • What is NATO. n.d. What Is NATO. https://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html. Accessed on June 11, 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Michael Weaver .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weaver, J.M. (2021). NATO Political Headquarters, Brussels Belgium. In: NATO in Contemporary Times. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68731-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics