Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter discusses approaches to functional behavioral assessment (FBA) within applied settings. The chapter begins with an overview of the FBA process as best practice in the assessment and treatment of challenging behavior. The next section provides a review of FBA methods with a focus on indirect and descriptive assessments. Within this section, common FBA procedures are reviewed, considerations in the selection of FBA methods are discussed, and a summary of relevant literature is provided. The chapter ends with practice guidelines for practitioners and future areas of study for researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alter, P. J., Conroy, M. A., Mancil, G. R., & Haydon, T. (2008). A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17(2), 200–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. M., Rodriguez, B. J., & Campbell, A. (2015). Functional behavior assessment in schools: Current status and future directions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(3), 338–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton-Arwood, S. M., Wehby, J. H., Gunter, P. L., & Lane, K. L. (2003). Functional behavior assessment rating scales: Intrarater reliability with students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 28(4), 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belva, B. C., Hattier, M. A., & Matson, J. L. (2013). Assessment of problem behavior. In Handbook of crisis intervention and developmental disabilities (pp. 123–146). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bijou, S. W., Peterson, R. F., & Ault, M. H. (1968). A method to integrate descriptive and experimental field studies at the level of data and empirical concepts 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(2), 175–191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, E., & Neel, R. S. (2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgmeier, C., Horner, R. H., & Koegel, R. L. (2006). An evaluation of the predictive validity of confidence ratings in identifying functional behavioral assessment hypothesis statements. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(2), 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, E. M., Iwata, B. A., Hammond, J. L., & Bloom, S. E. (2009). Antecedent versus consequent events as predictors of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 469–483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chok, J. T., Harper, J. M., Weiss, M. J., Bird, F. L., & Luiselli, J. K. (2020). Functional analysis: A practitioner’s guide to implementation and training. New York: Elsevier/Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dracobly, J. D., Dozier, C. L., Briggs, A. M., & Juanico, J. F. (2018). Reliability and validity of indirect assessment outcomes: Experts versus caregivers. Learning and Motivation, 62, 77–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene, B. A., Kazmerski, J. S., & Labrot, Z. (2017). The current status of indirect functional assessment instruments. Psychology in the Schools, 54(4), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18(1), 99–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingson, S. A., Miltenberger, R. G., & Long, E. S. (1999). A survey of the use of functional assessment procedures in agencies serving individuals with developmental disabilities. Behavioral Interventions: Theory & Practice in Residential & Community-Based Clinical Programs, 14(4), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, C. L., & Anderson, C. M. (2004). Effects of familiar versus unfamiliar therapists on responding in the analog functional analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25(1), 39–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fee, A., Schieber, E., Noble, N., & Valdovinos, M. G. (2016). Agreement between questions about behavior function, the motivation assessment scale, functional assessment interview, and brief functional analysis of children’s challenging behaviors. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(2), 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, R. G., Phaneuf, R. L., & Wilczynski, S. M. (2005). Measurement properties of indirect assessment methods for functional behavioral assessment: A review of research. School Psychology Review, 34(1), 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryling, M. J., & Baires, N. A. (2016). The practical importance of the distinction between open and closed-ended indirect assessments. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(2), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0115-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gable, R. A., Quinn, M. M., Rutherford Jr., R. B., Howell, K. W., & Hoffman, C. C. (1999). Addressing student problem behavior: Part 2. Conducting a functional behavioral assessment (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., Watson, T. S., & Skinner, C. H. (2001). Functional behavioral assessment: Principles, procedures, and future directions. School Psychology Review, 30(2), 156–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, L. P., Dozier, C. L., Rooker, G. W., & Jones, B. A. (2013). Assessment and treatment of severe problem behavior. In APA handbook of behavior analysis (Translating principles into practice) (Vol. 2, pp. 353–386). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. S. (2005). Comparing descriptive, experimental and informant-based assessments of problem behaviors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(6), 514–526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, G. P. (2012). Functional assessment of problem behavior: Dispelling myths, overcoming implementation obstacles, and developing new lore. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(1), 54–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(2), 147–185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., DeLeon, I. G., & Roscoe, E. M. (2013). Reliability and validity of the functional analysis screening tool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 271–284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197–209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994). What makes extinction work: An analysis of procedural form and function. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 131–144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. H., Goldberg, T. S., Hinant, R. L., & Couch, L. K. (2019). Trends and practices in functional behavior assessments completed by school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 360–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahng, S., Iwata, B. A., Fischer, S. M., Page, T. J., Treadwell, K. R., Williams, D. E., et al. (1998). Temporal distributions of problem behavior based on scatter plot analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(4), 593–604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, M. E., LaRue, R., Roane, H. S., & Gadaire, D. M. (2011). Indirect behavioral assessments: Interviews and rating scales. In W. W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, & H. S. Roane (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis (pp.182–190). New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C., Hovanetz, A., Strobel, M., & Tetreault, A. (2009). Accuracy of teacher-collected descriptive analysis data: A comparison of narrative and structured recording formats. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, D. C., & Iwata, B. A. (1993). Descriptive and experimental analyses of variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26(3), 293–319.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luna, O., Petri, J. M., Palmier, J., & Rapp, J. T. (2018). Comparing accuracy of descriptive assessment methods following a group training and feedback. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27(4), 488–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, A. P., Didden, R., Bouts, L., Smits, M. G., & Curfs, L. M. (2009). Scatter plot analysis of excessive daytime sleepiness and severe disruptive behavior in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome: A pilot study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(3), 529–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matson, J. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (1995). The questions about behavioral function (QABF) user’s guide. Baton Rouge, LA: Scientific Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson, J. L., Kuhn, D. E., Dixon, D. R., Mayville, S. B., Laud, R. B., Cooper, C. L., et al. (2003). The development and factor structure of the Functional Assessment for multiple CausaliTy (FACT). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(6), 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson, J. L., & Wilkins, J. (2008). Reliability of the autism spectrum disorders-comorbid for children (ASD-CC). Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 20(4), 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, G. R., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Wallace, M. (2014). Behavior analysis for lasting change (3rd ed.). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, K. L., & DiGennaro Reed, F. D. (2013). Effects of a training package to improve the accuracy of descriptive analysis data recording. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 33(4), 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidert, P. L., Rooker, G. W., Bayles, M. W., & Miller, J. R. (2013). Functional analysis of problem behavior. In Handbook of crisis intervention and developmental disabilities (pp. 147–167). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, R. E., Horner, R. H., Ablin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behaviors: A practical handbook. New York: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, A. C., Pratt, L. A., & Normand, M. P. (2015). A survey of functional behavior assessment methods used by behavior analysts in practice. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(4), 817–829.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paclawskyj, T. R., Matson, J. L., Rush, K. S., Smalls, Y., & Vollmer, T. R. (2000). Questions about behavioral function (QABF): A behavioral checklist for functional assessment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21(3), 223–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, L. D., Scott, T. M., & Conroy, M. (2007). A school-based examination of the efficacy of function-based intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 32(3), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, S. T., Roscoe, E. M., Bourret, J. C., & Ahearn, W. H. (2009). Relative contributions of three descriptive methods: Implications for behavioral assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 425–446.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rooker, G. W., DeLeon, I. G., Borrero, C. S., Frank-Crawford, M. A., & Roscoe, E. M. (2015). Reducing ambiguity in the functional assessment of problem behavior. Behavioral Interventions, 30(1), 1–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, E. M., Phillips, K. M., Kelly, M. A., Farber, R., & Dube, W. V. (2015). A statewide survey assessing practitioners’ use and perceived utility of functional assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(4), 830–844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saini, V., Ubdegrove, K., Biran, S., & Duncan, R. (2019). A preliminary evaluation of interrater reliability and concurrent validity of open-ended indirect assessment. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00364-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T. M., McIntyre, J., Liaupsin, C., Nelson, C. M., Conroy, M., & Payne, L. D. (2005). An examination of the relation between functional behavior assessment and selected intervention strategies with school-based teams. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(4), 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slocum, T. A., Detrich, R., Wilczynski, S. M., Spencer, T. D., Lewis, T., & Wolfe, K. (2014). The evidence-based practice of applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 37(1), 41–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, K. N. (2010). Research trends in descriptive analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today, 11(1), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. M., Smith, R. G., Dracobly, J. D., & Pace, A. P. (2012). Multiple-respondent anecdotal assessments: An analysis of interrater agreement and correspondence with analogue assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 779–795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, T. D., Detrich, R., & Slocum, T. A. (2012). Evidence-based practice: A framework for making effective decisions. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(2), 127–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugai, G., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Hagan, S. (1998). Using functional assessments to develop behavior support plans. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 43(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarbox, J., Wilke, A. E., Najdowski, A. C., Findel-Pyles, R. S., Balasanyan, S., Caveney, A. C., et al. (2009). Comparing indirect, descriptive, and experimental functional assessments of challenging behavior in children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21(6), 493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. H., & Iwata, B. A. (2007). A comparison of outcomes from descriptive and functional analyses of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 333–338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Touchette, P. E., MacDonald, R. F., & Langer, S. N. (1985). A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(4), 343–351.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, T. R., Borrero, J. C., Wright, C. S., Camp, C. V., & Lalli, J. S. (2001). Identifying possible contingencies during descriptive analyses of severe behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34(3), 269–287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, V. L., Chung, Y. C., & Bonnet, L. K. (2018). Function-based intervention in inclusive school settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaja, R. H., Moore, L., Van Ingen, D. J., & Rojahn, J. (2011). Psychometric comparison of the functional assessment instruments QABF, FACT and FAST for self-injurious, stereotypic and aggressive/destructive behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24(1), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarcone, J. R., Rodgers, T. A., Iwata, B. A., Rourke, D. A., & Dorsey, M. F. (1991). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: A failure to replicate. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12(4), 349–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill M. Harper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harper, J.M., Krasnopolsky, J., Theodore, M.C., Russell, C.E., Dodds, E.J. (2021). Functional Behavior Assessment. In: Luiselli, J.K. (eds) Applied Behavior Analysis Treatment of Violence and Aggression in Persons with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities . Advances in Preventing and Treating Violence and Aggression . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68549-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics