Skip to main content

The Concept of Risk Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Risks in the Railway System

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic ((STTT,volume 18))

  • 546 Accesses

Abstract

Risk management is a key element of all Organizations’ strategic management. Proper risk management increases the likelihood of success and helps Organizations achieve their overall goals. The alternative to risk management is risky management. An overview of the current frameworks for risk management around the world are presented: in the Civil Aviation Sector, the Enterprise Risk Management, the Project Management Institute (PMI), the Intergovernmental Organization for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) and the risk management framework in different countries: the UK, the European Union, the USA, Japan, Canada and Australia/New Zealand. A comparison of those risk management frameworks is provided. Finally, managing changes, the “change management process” aimed at ensuring that changes are implemented in a safe manner and ensuring that the Infrastructure Managers or Train Operating Companies (Railway Undertakings) continue to comply with the legal framework as also their certification conditions and restrictions will be discussed. By reading this chapter, you will understand why we need risk management and recognize that there are different approaches on how to manage risks and how an effective “change management process” will assist Infrastructure Managers or Train Operating Companies (Railway Undertakings) in the decision-making process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As per ISO 31000, Risk management refers to a “coordinated application of resources to minimise, monitor, and control the probability and/ or impact of unfortunate events or to maximise the realisation of opportunities”.

  2. 2.

    https://www.icsa.org.uk/about-us/policy/what-is-corporate-governance.

  3. 3.

    https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/CS-25%20Amendment%2018_0.pdf.

  4. 4.

    A condition having an effect on the aeroplane and/or its occupants, either direct or consequential, which is caused or contributed to by one or more failures or errors, considering the flight phase and relevant adverse operational or environmental conditions.

  5. 5.

    https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html.

  6. 6.

    CSM RA: common safety method (CSM) for risk evaluation and assessment, see Sect. ‎2.1.12.2.

  7. 7.

    See https://otif.org/fileadmin/new/3-Reference-Text/3D-Technical-Interoperability/3D1-Prescriptions-and-other-rules/TECH-16037-CTE10-6.4_v2_e_validated_expl-doc-UTP-GEN-G.pdf.

  8. 8.

    The standard is available at http://www.airmic.com/

  9. 9.

    According to ISO definition, in some industries, risk financing refers to funding only the consequences related to the risk and not the risk management.

  10. 10.

    Silo mentality is an attitude that is found in some organizations; it occurs when several departments or groups within an organization do not want to share information or knowledge with other individuals in the same organization.

  11. 11.

    The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) is a joint initiative of five private sector organizations and is dedicated to providing thought leadership through the development of frameworks and guidance on enterprise risk management, internal control and fraud deterrence.

  12. 12.

    COSO was not the first to publish practical guidance on an enterprise wide approach to risk management. The first edition of the joint Australian/New Zealand Standard for Risk Management was published in 1995. A further edition, published in 1999, provides guidance on how to establish and implement an enterprise wide risk management process.

  13. 13.

    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:220:0016:0039:EN:PDF.

  14. 14.

    Next, an overview of the regulations related to the common safety method (CSM) for risk evaluation and assessment (CSM RA) is given:

    • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 402/2013 (the Regulation on a common safety method (CSM) for risk evaluation and assessment (or ‘the CSM RA’)) came into force on 30 April 2013. It is a framework that describes a common mandatory European risk management process for the rail industry and does not prescribe specific tools or techniques to be used.

    • Commission Regulation (EC) 352/2009, which was in force since 1 July 2010, was repealed on 21 May 2015 when Implementing Regulation (EU) 402/2013 started to apply. However, the provisions of 352/2009 will continue to apply in relation to projects which are at an advanced stage of development.

    • Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1136 was adopted by the European Commission on 13 July 2015 and amends Implementing Regulation (EU) No 402/2013.

  15. 15.

    Common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment (CSM RA).

  16. 16.

    CSM for risk evaluation and assessment.

  17. 17.

    Proposer is a person making the change (technical, operational or Organizational change).

  18. 18.

    A proposer is a person making the change.

  19. 19.

    A record of who attended the hazard identification workshop, or otherwise took part in the classification, will help demonstrate that the requirement to apply expert judgement has been met.

  20. 20.

    This is analogous to the field of medicine where treatments are the available therapeutic options for disease management, while risk controls are the specific care plan the physician has selected from the available treatment options.

  21. 21.

    Staff turnover refers to the number or percentage of workers who leave an organization and are replaced by new employees.

  22. 22.

    Lead time is the time between the original development of the consultation plan and its actual issue.

  23. 23.

    For example, a change may reduce risk to a group, but introduce or increase risk to another group or an individual. In such circumstances there is a need to balance the risks affecting each group so that one group does not suffer very high levels of residual risk to reduce or remove the risk to the other.

References

  1. Shortreed J, Hicks J, Craig L (2003) Basic Frameworks for Risk Management, Final Report. Prepared for The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Network for Environmental Risk Assessment and Management (NERAM)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand (2005) Risk management guidelines—companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thornton G (2017) Risk frameworks—driving business strategy with effective risk frameworks

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Union Agency for Railways (2017) ‘Safety Critical Components” in railways—the concept of “Safety Criticality” of the systems, Draft Report V0.1

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO 31000, Risk management—principles and guidelines, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  6. PMI (Project Management Institute) (2009) Practice standard for project risk management, PMI

    Google Scholar 

  7. PMI (Project Management Institute) (2017) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 6th edn. PMI

    Google Scholar 

  8. Remzi A, Besarta V (2017) Analysis of international risk management standards (advantages and disadvantages). Eur J Res Reflection Manag Sci 5(3)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (2004) Enterprise risk management—integrated framework

    Google Scholar 

  10. Intergovernmental Organization for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) (2016) Uniform Technical Prescription—Common Safety Method on risk evaluation and assessment (UTP GEN-G consolidated version), 12 Jan 2016

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) (2008) Enterprise risk management—Topic Gateway Series No. 49

    Google Scholar 

  12. Australian/New Zealand Standard, AS/NZS 4360 SET Risk Management, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  13. British Standard, BS 6079-3:2000/Project management. Guide to the management of business related project risk, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Institute of Risk Management, A Risk Management Standard (IRM/Alarm/AIRMIC) 2002

    Google Scholar 

  15. REGULATION (EU) No 402/2013 Common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment…, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  16. ORR (Office of Rail and Road), (UK), Common Safety Method for risk evaluation and assessment—Guidance on the application of Commission Regulation (EU) 402/2013, March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  17. The EU Agency for Railways—collection of examples of risk assessments and some possible tools: http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Documents/collection_of_RA_Ex_and_some_tools_for_CSM_V1.1.pdf

  18. CENELEC EN 50126-1:2017—Railway Applications: The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). Generic RAMS Process

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Association of Insurance & Risk Managers (AIRMIC) (2005) An overview comparison of the AIRMIC/ALARM/ IRM Risk Management Standard with: the Australia/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4360:2004, the COSO Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework

    Google Scholar 

  20. AIRMIC/ALARM/IRM Risk Management Standard, 2002 (Institute of Risk Management (IRM), The Association of Insurance and Risk Manager (AIRMIC) and The Public Risk Management Association (ALARM))

    Google Scholar 

  21. Office of the National Safety Regulator (Australia) (2013) Guideline for Preparation of a Safety Management System

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weeserik BP, Spruit M (2018) Improving operational risk management using business performance management technologies. Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht Organization, MDPI, Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  23. Commission Regulation (EC) 352/2009: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:108:0004:0019:EN:PDF

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Tzanakakis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tzanakakis, K. (2021). The Concept of Risk Management. In: Managing Risks in the Railway System. Springer Tracts on Transportation and Traffic, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66266-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66266-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66265-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66266-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics