Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations ((PPCE,volume 16))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

The idea that religions should be pluralist is often supported by commentators. It opposes the more rigid suggestion that a particular religion is the only valid route to the truth and salvation. A problem with the latter idea of course is that it makes dialogue meaningless, since the only point to talking to those in other faiths would be to try to convince them of the truth of your own religion. It is not difficult to find indications in many religions that a variety of views on basic issues are acceptable and indeed should be welcomed as progressive. It is argued here, though, that such an approach really does not do justice to the Qur’an. Like many religions, Islam requires obedience to divine authority and is often critical of alternative ways of thinking and behaving. We may regret that this is the case, but religions are often illiberal institutions and should be accurately described as such.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Oliver Leaman, The Qur’an: A Philosophical Guide (London: Bloomsbury, 2016), 238–9.

  2. 2.

    Ibid, 62.

  3. 3.

    Asma Barlas, “Believing Women” in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002), 4.

  4. 4.

    Adis Duderija, The Imperatives of Progressive Islam (London and New York: Routledge, 2017).

  5. 5.

    Reference is to Qur’an 18: 60–82; Leaman, The Qur’an: a Philosophical Guide, 2016, 171.

  6. 6.

    Qur’an 35: 32; see also Leaman, The Qur’an: A Philosophical Guide, 2016, 213–14.

  7. 7.

    Qur’an 2: 34; Leaman, The Qur’an: A Philosophical Guide, 2016, 54–5.

References

  • Al-Buti, Ramadan, and M. Sa’id. 2001. Dawabit al-maslahah, The rules of welfare. Damascus: Waqf al-Risala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allam, Shaykh. 2015. Terrorists and Their Quranic Delusions. Wall Street Journal (April 9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qahtani, M. bin ‘Ali. 2015. Understanding Maqāṣṣid al-Sharīʿah: A Contemporary Perspective. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Auda, Jasser. 2008. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barlas, Asma. 2002. Believing Women. In Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur'an. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanini, Massimo. 2016. Philosophical Perspectives on Modern Qur'anic Exegesis: Key Paradigms and Concepts. Sheffield: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duderija, Adis. 2017. The Imperatives of Progressive Islam. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, John, and Natana Delong-Bas. 2018. Shariah: What Everyone Needs to Know About Isam. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fadel, Mohammed. 2008. The True, the Good and the Reasonable: The Theological and Ethical Roots of Public Reason in Islamic Law. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21 (1): 5–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleave, Robin. 2013. Islam and Literalism: Literal Meaning and Interpretation in Islamic Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, L. Ali, and Hisham Ramadan. 2011. Contemporary Ijtihad: Limits and Controversy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaman, Oliver. 2013. Controversies in Contemporary Islam. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. The Qur’an: A Philosophical Guide. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shabana, Ayman. 2010. Custom in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of the Concepts of ‘Urf and’ Adah in the Islamic Legal Tradition. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leaman, O. (2021). The Qur’an and Pluralism: A Skeptical View. In: Hashas, M. (eds) Pluralism in Islamic Contexts - Ethics, Politics and Modern Challenges. Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66089-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics