Skip to main content

Abstract

The term governance, after its emergence in the 1980s, has led to different conceptions, connotations, and contested understandings. Its wide and diverse uses make it seem all inclusive as well as vague. This chapter recaps some of the popular concepts of governance in political and administrative sciences. These are governance as good governance, governance as policy implementation, governance as institutional trust, governance as quality of government, governance as network, and governance as institutions. Some of these concepts have been used by the authors of this volume, at the macro-level, to analyze the implementation of national policies, as well as at the micro-level, to understand and conceptualize the meaning of governance in local service delivery in three South Asian countries—Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. The context of South Asia in general and these three countries in particular reflects a type of hybrid governance that combines not only the above-mentioned concepts of governance but also the paternalistic culture of South Asia, which can lead to informal but also trusting relations between institutions and society. The final part of the chapter introduces the individual authors’ contributions to the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In 2019, 100 countries were democracies (electoral + liberal democracy) compared to 80 countries which were either closed or electoral autocracies. In 1997, the number of democracies was 38 (electoral + liberal democracy) while the number of closed or electoral autocracies was 117. In the case of South Asia, most were closed autocracies (five out of 8 countries) in 1997, while none in 2018 (Source: Lührmann et al. [2019]. V-Dem Dataset v9, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19 accessed 19.12.20).

References

  • Askvik, S. (2007). Political regime and popular trust in the civil service: South Africa and Norway compared. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 9(1), 69–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askvik, S., Jamil, I., & Dhakal, T. N. (2011). Citizens’ trust in public and political institutions in Nepal. International Political Science Review, 32(4), 417–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2011). Governance as theory, practice, and dilemma. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Governance (pp. 1–16). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Quality of public service delivery and governing networks. In A. Salminen (Ed.), Governing networks: EGPA yearbook (pp. 299–318). IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). Democracy and administrative policy: Contrasting elements of New Public Management (NPM) and post-NPM. European Political Science Review, 3(1), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2013). Scancor and Norwegian public administration research development. Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, 15(4), 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2018). An organization approach to public administration. In The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 1087–1104). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan, S., & Pollitt, C. (2015). NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern Europe. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1305–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A., & Carter, R. (Eds.). (2004). Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations. Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., & Pollitt, C. (2007). Introductory remarks. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 1–4). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2016). Governance: What do we know, and how do we know it? Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 533–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 791–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S., & Rothstein, B. (Eds.). (2012). Good government: The relevance of political science. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I. (2007). Administrative culture in Bangladesh. AH Development Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I., & Askvik, S. (2016). Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(9), 647–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I., Aminuzzaman, S. M., & Haque, S. T. M. (Eds.). (2015). Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia: Trends, issues and challenges (vol. 15). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I., Askvik, S., & Dhakal, T. N. (2013). Understanding governance in South Asia. In I. Jamil, S. Askvik, & T.N. Dhakal (Eds.), In search of better governance in South Asia and beyond (pp. 13–35). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I., & Baniamin, H. M. (2020). How culture may nurture institutional trust: Some empirical insights from Bangladesh and Nepal. Development Policy Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido, P. (1999). Governance matters (World Bank policy Research Working Paper [2196]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y. (2005). ‘Bowling together’ isn’t a cure-all: The relationship between social capital and political trust in South Korea. International Political Science Review, 26(2), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjær, A. M. (2004). Governance. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. M. (2011). Rhodes’ contribution to governance theory: Praise, criticism and the future governance debate. Public Administration, 89(1), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2012). New public management and governance: A comparison. In D. Levi Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance, (pp. 201–214). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P. (2017). New public management. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R. Y., & Putnam, R. D. (2001). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lührmann et al. (2019). V-Dem Dataset v9, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19.

  • Ma, D., & Yang, F. (2014). Authoritarian orientations and political trust in East Asian societies. East Asia, 31(4), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1996). Institutional perspectives on political institutions. Governance, 9(3), 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: The five strategies for reinventing government. New York: Penguin, 16, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2016). Managerialism redux? Financial Accountability & Management, 32(4), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44, 652–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment: Working with women in Honduras. Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker, A. E. (2006). New public management in developing countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1), 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 197–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). The democratizing impact of governance networks: From pluralization, via democratic anchorage, to interactive political leadership. Public Administration, 96(2), 302–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (1998). Public-private partnerships and urban governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Public-private partnerships in Europe and United States. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2002). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. (2012). Governance networks. In D. Levi Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (chapter 7). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. A UNDP policy document. UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 745–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, C., & Russell, D. (2017). Cultural change in Asia and beyond: From allegiant to assertive citizens. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 2(2), 112–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T. K. Y., Wan, P. S., & Hsiao, H. H. M. (2011). The bases of political trust in six Asian societies: Institutional and cultural explanations compared. International Political Science Review, 32(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1989). Sub-Saharan Africa: From crises to sustainable growth. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2017). World development report: Governance and law. World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ishtiaq Jamil .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jamil, I., Dhakal, T.N., Haque, S.T.M., Paudel, L.K., Baniamin, H.M. (2021). Understanding Governance in Three South Asian Countries. In: Jamil, I., Dhakal, T.N., Haque, S.T.M., Paudel, L.K., Baniamin, H.M. (eds) Policy Response, Local Service Delivery, and Governance in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66018-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics