Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy ((SUTP))

  • 389 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents some general results that hinge on the notion of cardinality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Georg Ferdinand Ludwig Philipp Cantor (1845–1918), a German mathematician, developed the theory of transfinite numbers, spelling out its fundamental concepts and proving its most important theorems. Although today set theory is widely accepted as a fundamental part of mathematics, this was not always the case, and Cantor had to argue for his view. Some theologians criticized the theory of transfinite numbers because they saw it as a challenge to the absolute infinity of God. Cantor contended that we can conceive God as the Absolute Infinite, a number which is bigger than any conceivable or inconceivable quantity. In fact, he believed that God himself communicated to him the theory of transfinite numbers.

  2. 2.

    Leopold Löwenheim (1878–1957), a German mathematician, proved a first result in Löwenheim [43]. Albert Thoralf Skolem (1887–1863), a Norwegian mathematician, provided a simplified version of Löwenheim’s result in Skolem [59]. These results were first outlined in their full generality in Maltsev [46]. The upward result is attributed to Tarski. Surely it cannot be ascribed to Skolem, who did not believe in the existence of nondenumerable sets.

  3. 3.

    Willard Van Orman Quine (1908–2000), an American philosopher, is widely considered one of the dominant figures in analytic philosophy in the second half of the twentieth century. He produced original and important works in several areas, including logic, ontology, epistemology, and the philosophy of language. He presents his arguments about the inscrutability of reference in Quine [54], among other works.

References

  1. Löwenheim, L. (1915). Über Moglichkeiten im Relativkalkül. Mathematische Annalen, 76, 447–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maltsev, A. I. (1936). Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiete der mathematischen Logik. Novaya Seriya, pp. 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quine, W. V. O. (1968). Ontological relativity. Journal of Philosophy, 65, 185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Skolem, T. (1920). Logisch-kombinatorische über die Untersuchungen Erfüllbarkeit oder Beweisbarkeit mathematischer Sätze nebst einem Theoreme über dichte Mengen. Videnskapsselskapet Sktrifter, I. Matematisk-naturvidenskabelig Klasse, 4:1–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iacona, A. (2021). Theories and Models. In: LOGIC: Lecture Notes for Philosophy, Mathematics, and Computer Science. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64811-4_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics