Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mathematical Modeling and Uncertainty Management of the Modern Multi-Carrier Energy Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Grid Modernization ─ Future Energy Network Infrastructure

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

  • 359 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, renewable energy resources (RERs) are taken into account as the popular generation units due to economic advantages as well as trouncing the environmental emissions. Indeed, increasing the level of RERs in the energy generation cycle has made the prediction of the amount of energy production more difficult and intermittent. Therefore, in spite of the existence of a strong motivation for high usage of RERs in the energy generation process, some basic challenges as well as uncertainty modeling of the system should be considered in optimal operation of the renewable-based multi-carrier energy networks (MCENs). After analyzing the MCENs from different aspects in the previous chapters, this chapter is targeted to provide the mathematical models for MCENs and their uncertainty quantification with the aim of facilitating their implementation in real hybrid energy networks. Given the provided mathematical models, the optimal scheduling of the interconnected microgrids with a full share of RERs is considered as a case study for examining a sample MCENs with real-recorded data. Indeed, each microgrid is only equipped with the RERs with the aim of the complete production of clean energy. In the studied system, the probabilistic modeling of the problem has been performed using the information gap decision theory (IGDT) method, in which both the robustness and opportunistic states of the RERs are respectively modeled as the risk-averse and risk-seeker strategies. In order to reliably meet the energy demand in the presence of 100% RERs, transactive multi-carrier energy technology is exerted for building a local energy trading environment considering both the economic and control mechanisms. The result analysis indicated the effectiveness of the proposed model for the MCENs with 100% RERs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Daneshvar, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, M. Abapour, S. Asadi, Energy exchange control in multiple microgrids with transactive energy management. J. Modern Power Syst. Clean Energy, 8(4), 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Daneshvar, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, S. Asadi, M. Abapour, A. Anvari-Moghaddam, A transactive energy management framework for regional network of microgrids, in 2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST), (IEEE, 2019), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Wang et al., Impact of power-to-gas cost characteristics on power-gas-heating integrated system scheduling. IEEE Access 7, 17654–17662 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Daneshvar, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, K. Zare, S. Asadi, Two-stage robust stochastic scheduling model for transactive energy based renewable microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform, 16(11), 1–1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Daneshvar, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, K. Zare, S. Asadi, Two-stage stochastic programming model for optimal scheduling of the wind-thermal-hydropower-pumped storage system considering the flexibility assessment. Energy 193, 116657 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Shao, X. Wang, M. Shahidehpour, X. Wang, B. Wang, An MILP-based optimal power flow in multicarrier energy systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 8(1), 239–248 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Wu, M. Shahidehpour, Optimal coordination of stochastic hydro and natural gas supplies in midterm operation of power systems. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib 5(5), 577–587 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Qiu, J. Zhao, H. Yang, Z.Y. Dong, Optimal scheduling for prosumers in coupled transactive power and gas systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(2), 1970–1980 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Chaudry, N. Jenkins, G. Strbac, Multi-time period combined gas and electricity network optimisation. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 78(7), 1265–1279 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. An, Q. Li, T.W. Gedra, Natural gas and electricity optimal power flow, in 2003 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37495), vol. 1, (IEEE, 2003), pp. 138–143

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kabirian, M.R. Hemmati, A strategic planning model for natural gas transmission networks. Energy Policy 35(11), 5656–5670 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Daneshvar, B.M. Ivatloo, M. Abapour, S. Asadi, R. Khanjani, Distributionally robust chance constrained transactive energy framework for coupled electrical and gas microgrids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 68(1), 1–1 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Li, W. Wu, J. Wang, B. Zhang, T. Zheng, Transmission-constrained unit commitment considering combined electricity and district heating networks. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7(2), 480–492 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Cao, W. Wei, L. Wu, S. Mei, M. Shahidehpour, Z. Li, Decentralized operation of interdependent power distribution network and district heating network: A market-driven approach. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10(5), 5374–5385 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. X. Liu, J. Wu, N. Jenkins, A. Bagdanavicius, Combined analysis of electricity and heat networks. Appl. Energy 162, 1238–1250 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Chen, W. Wei, F. Liu, E.E. Sauma, S. Mei, Energy trading and market equilibrium in integrated heat-power distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10(4), 4080–4094 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Daneshvar, M. Pesaran, B. Mohammadi-ivatloo, Transactive energy integration in future smart rural network electrification. J. Clean. Prod. 190, 645–654 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Zheng, J. Chen, Q. Wu, Z. Jing, Multi-objective optimization and decision making for power dispatch of a large-scale integrated energy system with distributed DHCs embedded. Appl. Energy 154, 369–379 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M.J.V. Pakdel, F. Sohrabi, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Multi-objective optimization of energy and water management in networked hubs considering transactive energy. J. Clean. Prod. 126, 121936 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Zhang, X. Xia, J. Zhang, Optimal sizing and operation of pumping systems to achieve energy efficiency and load shifting. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 86, 41–50 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. Shu, P. Jirutitijaroen, Latin hypercube sampling techniques for power systems reliability analysis with renewable energy sources. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 26(4), 2066–2073 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Karki, R. Billinton, Reliability/cost implications of PV and wind energy utilization in small isolated power systems. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers 16(4), 368–373 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R.Y. Rubinstein, D.P. Kroese, Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method (Wiley, Hoboken, 2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Yu, C. Chung, K. Wong, H. Lee, J. Zhang, Probabilistic load flow evaluation with hybrid latin hypercube sampling and cholesky decomposition. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24(2), 661–667 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. A. Gupta, A. Kumar, ATC calculation including wind: A probabilistic study and a comparison of MCS and LHS, in 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS), (IEEE, 2016), pp. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Alipour, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, K. Zare, Stochastic risk-constrained short-term scheduling of industrial cogeneration systems in the presence of demand response programs. Appl. Energy 136, 393–404 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Dupačová, N. Gröwe-Kuska, W. Römisch, Scenario reduction in stochastic programming. Math. Program. 95(3), 493–511 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. K. Bruninx, E. Delarue, W. D’haeseleer, A practical approach on scenario generation & reduction algorithms based on probability distance measures–the case of wind power forecast errors, WP EN2014-15, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  29. W.L. de Oliveira, C. Sagastizábal, D.D.J. Penna, M.E.P. Maceira, J.M. Damázio, Optimal scenario tree reduction for stochastic streamflows in power generation planning problems. Optim. Methods Softw 25(6), 917–936 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Men, P. Jiang, H. Xu, A chance constrained programming approach for HazMat capacitated vehicle routing problem in Type-2 fuzzy environment. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117754 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Zhao et al., An islanding partition method of active distribution networks based on chance-constrained programming. Appl. Energy 242, 78–91 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A.L. Soyster, Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper. Res. 21(5), 1154–1157 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. A.S. Nemirovskiĭ, L. El Ghaoui, A. Ben-Tal, Robust Optimization (Princeton Series in Applied Mathematics) (Princeton University Press, Princeton)

    Google Scholar 

  34. M. Daneshvar, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, K. Zare, Two-stage optimal robust scheduling of hybrid energy system considering the demand response programs. J. Clean. Prod. 248, 119267 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Soroudi, Robust optimization based self scheduling of hydro-thermal Genco in smart grids. Energy 61, 262–271 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. G. Gordon, R. Tibshirani, Karush-kuhn-tucker conditions. Optimization 10(725/36), 725 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Castillo, A. Conejo, P. Pedregal, R. García, N. Alguacil, Building and Solving Mathematical Programming Models in Engineering and Science (Wiley, Hoboken, 2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Zare, C. Chung, J. Zhan, S.O. Faried, A distributionally robust chance-constrained MILP model for multistage distribution system planning with uncertain renewables and loads. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 33(5), 5248–5262 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. G.C. Calafiore, L. El Ghaoui, On distributionally robust chance-constrained linear programs. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 130(1), 1–22 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. M. Daneshvar, B. Mohammadi-ivatloo, K. Zare, S. Asadi, A. Anvari-Moghaddam, A novel operational model for interconnected microgrids participation in transactive energy market: A hybrid IGDT/stochastic approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform, 1–1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3012446

  41. M. Majidi, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, A. Soroudi, Application of information gap decision theory in practical energy problems: A comprehensive review. Appl. Energy 249, 157–165 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Shafiee, H. Zareipour, A.M. Knight, N. Amjady, B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Risk-constrained bidding and offering strategy for a merchant compressed air energy storage plant. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 32(2), 946–957 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

    Mohammadreza Daneshvar & Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo

  2. Department of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

    Somayeh Asadi

  3. Department of Energy Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo

Authors
  1. Mohammadreza Daneshvar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Somayeh Asadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Behnam Mohammadi-Ivatloo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daneshvar, M., Asadi, S., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (2021). Mathematical Modeling and Uncertainty Management of the Modern Multi-Carrier Energy Networks. In: Grid Modernization ─ Future Energy Network Infrastructure. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64099-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64099-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-64098-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-64099-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation