Skip to main content

The Non Regulation of Hedge Funds in Offshores Jurisdictions: Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Mauritius, and Delaware

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Regulation of Hedge Funds
  • 324 Accesses

Abstract

Hedge funds may be established anywhere in the world, both onshore and offshore. To shed more light on the offshore hedge fund industry, with main focus on the following offshores jurisdictions: Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Mauritius, and Delaware, the current chapter focuses at first on the differences between onshore and offshore funds from the point of view of their legal structures, and particularly with regard to tax requirements. Indeed, there are plenty of benefits for hedge funds in moving offshore, the most important being for sure the tax neutrality, as these locations are known also under the name of “tax havens.” Also, there is a major focus on advantages and disadvantages of legal fund vehicles and structures which operate in offshore places. The current chapter analyzes only three regions of the world’s most important locations for offshore funds: the Caribbean, more precisely the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands, United States, respectively Delaware, and Africa—Mauritius. The chapter provides an in‐depth analysis of the four jurisdictions from the point of view of hedge funds. Despite increasing convergence, meaningful differences between the four regimes can be observed. The chapter explores several of these similarities and differences, as well of advantages and disadvantages offered by each jurisdiction. The Cayman Islands is one of the largest financial centers globally speaking, as well as a key node in contemporary global finance, standing as the legal domicile of choice for the global hedge fund industry. Delaware is perceived as a de facto offshore financial center or as a “domestic tax haven” of the United States, performing similar to the Cayman Island, providing low levels of regulation and taxation, as well as a high degree of stability. Both UK and US hedge funds are attracted by the British Virgin Islands, mainly because this country is historically tied to the United Kingdom and geographically to the United States. The British Virgin Islands stands as one of the best, highly respected hedge funds’ domiciles, globally speaking. In addition to its modern, efficient banking system stands the government’s public policies focused mainly on developing strict money laundering and tax evasion standards, this earning for the British Virgin Islands a leading reputation in the financial world. Last but not least, Mauritius is the favorite offshore center for Far East investing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Palan, R. (1998). Trying to have your cake and eating it: How and why the state system has created offshore. International Studies Quarterly, 42(4), 625–644.

  2. 2.

    Khelifa, S. B., & Hmaied, D. M. (2014). European hedge funds industry: An overview. The Journal of Private Equity, 18(1), 46–59.

  3. 3.

    Unrelated Business Taxable Income (I.R.C. Section 511(a)(1)). The definition of the UBTI regards the gross income derived either directly, or indirectly, through a partnership with any organization; this is chargeable on the profit its unrelated trade activity or other business regularly carried on by it (I.R.C. Section 512), minus the deductions directly connected with carrying out such activity. Both the gross income and the deductions are computed with certain modifications and are subject to certain exclusions.

    In general, UBTI does not imply: interest, dividends, or gains from the sale or exchange of capital assets. As a consequence, a tax-exempt investor’s distributive share from a hedge fund does not class as UBTI, which does not make it subject to federal income tax.

  4. 4.

    Palan, R., Murphy, R., & Chavagneux, C. (2010). Tax havens: How globalization really works. New York: Cornell University Press.

  5. 5.

    Palan, R. (2015). The second British Empire: The British Empire and the re-emergence of global finance. In S. Halperin & R. Palan (Eds.), Legacies of empire imperial roots of the contemporary global order (pp. 40–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  6. 6.

    Browning, L. (2017b, June 12). Trump’s offshore tax plan may mean perk for Apple, Pfizer. Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-12/trump-s-offshore-tax-plan-may-mean-extra-perk-for-apple-pfizer. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  7. 7.

    Palan, R., Murphy, R., & Chavagneux, C. (2010). Tax havens: How globalization really works. New York: Cornell University Press.

  8. 8.

    Located in the Western Caribbean.

  9. 9.

    Fichtner, J. (2016). The anatomy of the Cayman Islands Offshore Financial Center: Anglo-America, Japan, and the role of hedge funds. Review of International Political Economy, 23, 1034 (“About 60% of global hedge fund assets are legally domiciled in Cayman”).

  10. 10.

    Ronalds-Hannon, E. (2016, June 21). Hedge funds’ misery exposed as Caribbean proxies dump treasuries. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-21/hedge-funds-misery-exposed-as-caribbean-proxies-dump-treasuries. Accessed 6 April 2020.

  11. 11.

    Corporate. (2018). APPLEBY. http://www.applebyglobal.com/services/corporate.aspx. Accessed 12 March 2020; Fitzgibbon, W. (2017, November 5). Appleby, the offshore law firm with a record of compliance failures. Irish Times. https://www.irishtimes.com/business/appleby-the-offshore-law-firm-with-a-record-of-compliance-failures-1.3280860. Accessed 12 March 2020; see also Valencia, M. (2013, February 16). Storm survivors. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21571549-offshore-financial-centres-have-taken-battering-recently-they-have-shown-remarkable. Accessed 6 April 2020 (assessing that offshore financial havens grew “often with help from lawyers based in Wall Street or the City of London”).

  12. 12.

    Clarke, C. (2016). What are tax havens and why are they bad? Texas Law Review, 95, 59–68.

  13. 13.

    De Brouwer, G. (2001). Hedge funds in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  14. 14.

    Fichtner, J. (2016). The anatomy of the Cayman Islands Offshore Financial Center: Anglo-America, Japan, and the role of hedge funds. Review of International Political Economy, 23, 1037.

  15. 15.

    Fichtner, J. (2013). The rise of hedge funds: A story of inequality. Momentum Quarterly, 2(1), 3–20.

  16. 16.

    Idem, at 4.

  17. 17.

    Idem, at 4.

  18. 18.

    These states have no or limited income tax and managers have broad freedom of action.

  19. 19.

    First, there is no real exchange of tax information with foreign authorities, and there is insufficient transparency in the function of legal provisions. Second, there are no income taxes. Finally, the substantial local presence is not required.

  20. 20.

    Khelifa, S. B., & Hmaied, D. M. (2014). European hedge funds industry: An overview. The Journal of Private Equity, 18(1), 46–59.

  21. 21.

    Cumming, D., Dai, N., & Johan, S. A. (2015). Are hedge funds domiciled in delaware different? Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 232–246.

  22. 22.

    Cumming, D., Dai, N., & Johan, S. A. (2013). Hedge fund structure, regulation, and performance around the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  23. 23.

    See in this vein Brown et al. (1999), who analyze offshore fund performance by using information from the US Offshore Funds Directory, Aragon, G. B., & Park, L. H. (2014). Onshore and offshore hedge funds: Are they twins? Management Science, 60(1), 74–91.

  24. 24.

    Gross, PhS. (2004). Tax planning for offshore hedge funds—Potential benefits of investing in a PFIC. Journal of Taxation of Investments, 21(2), 187–195.

  25. 25.

    See §§3(c)(l) and 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Although a fund can have an unlimited number of qualified investors under the §3(c)(7) exemption, a fund having more than 499 investors would trigger registration under the Security Exchange Act of 1934. Also, in addition to avoiding fund registration, managers of onshore funds further rely on an exemption from registering with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Advisers Act.

  26. 26.

    Barth, M. H., & Blanco, M. (2001). US regulatory and tax considerations for offshore funds. In S. Barham, I. Hallsworth, & C. Bonnett (Eds.), The capital guide to offshore funds 2001 (pp. 15–61). The Hague: ISI Publications.

  27. 27.

    Cumming, D. J., & Dai, N. (2010). Local bias in venture capital investments. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17, 362–380. In this paper, they summarize the regulations of hedge funds across 29 countries. They discover that, in contrast to offshore fund managers, onshore fund managers are restricted to only one (private placement) of a possible seven distinct marketing channels: banks, fund distribution companies, wrappers, private placements, investment managers, other regulated financial service institutions, and nonregulated financial intermediaries.

  28. 28.

    Tuchschmid, N. S., & Wallerstein, E. (2013). UCITS: Can they bring funds of hedge funds on-shore? The Journal of Wealth Management, 15(4), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2013.15.4.094.

  29. 29.

    US taxable investors face tax rules that may discourage them from investing in offshore funds, Gross, PhS. (2004). Tax planning for offshore hedge funds—Potential benefits of investing in a PFIC. Journal of Taxation of Investments, 21(2), 187–195.

  30. 30.

    McCrary, S. A. (2002). How to create and manage a hedge fund—A professional’s guide. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

  31. 31.

    Aragon, G. B., & Park, L. H. (2014). Onshore and offshore hedge funds: Are they twins? Management Science, 60(1), 74–91.

  32. 32.

    Fichtner, J. (2016). The anatomy of the Cayman Islands Offshore Financial Center: Anglo-America, Japan, and the role of hedge funds. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 1034–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1243143.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., p. 90.

  34. 34.

    Johnston, D. C. (2007). Free lunch: How the wealthiest Americans enrich themselves at government expense. New York: Penguin Group (“Hedge funds are legally organized offshore, the favorite spot being the Cayman Islands Most hedge-fund managers have never even been to the Cayman Islands, making the headquarters arrangement a farce.”); Deloitte (2015). Establishing investment funds in the Cayman Islands: Key considerations. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/bm/Documents/financial-services/cayman-islands/establishing-investment-funds-in-the-cayman-islands.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2020.

  35. 35.

    Cent. Intelligence Agency. (2018). The World Factbook: Cayman Islands. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cj.html. Accessed 6 April 2020.

  36. 36.

    Pistor, K. (2013). A legal theory of finance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(2), 315–330.

    Private Funds Law. (2020). Law 1 of 2020 Supplement No. 1 published with Legislation Gazette No. 9 dated 7th February, 2020. https://www.cima.ky/upimages/commonfiles/PrivateFundsLaw2020_1581524961.PDF. Accessed 12 April 2020.

  37. 37.

    Kleinbard, E. D. (2003). Competitive convergence in the financial services markets. Taxes, 81, 225–260.

  38. 38.

    Philip, R. L., & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2010). Cross-border investment in small international financial centers. International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 10(38), 1–32. In this vein, Professor William Magnuson explained that the remarkable mobility of capital has allowed “companies to operate on a global basis from headquarters in the Cayman Islands or the Seychelles, countries recognized as tax havens.” Magnuson, W. (2016). Unilateral corporate regulation. Chicago Journal of International Law, 17, 521–537.

  39. 39.

    Moon, W. J. (2019). Regulating offshore finance. Vanderbilt Law Review, 72(1), 1–54.

  40. 40.

    Cohen, A. R., & Williams, C. S. (2011). Comparison by practitioners of Delaware and Cayman Islands Limited Partnerships. Bloomberg Finance L.P. Law Reports—Fund Management and Bloomberg Law Reports—Securities Law.

  41. 41.

    but treated as a partnership for US tax purposes via a check‐the‐box election.

  42. 42.

    Cohen, A. R., & Williams, C. S. (2011). Comparison by practitioners of Delaware and Cayman Islands Limited partnerships. Bloomberg Finance L.P. Law Reports—Fund Management and Bloomberg Law Reports—Securities Law.

  43. 43.

    Wolters Kluwer. (2015). A guide to the top 20 offshore fund locations. https://ct.wolterskluwer.com/sites/default/files/CT_Top_20_Offshore_Funds_0.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2020.

  44. 44.

    Idem.

  45. 45.

    Roberts, S. (1995). Small place, big money: The Cayman Islands and the International Financial System. Economic Geography, 71(3), 237–256.

  46. 46.

    Offshore financial center.

  47. 47.

    Harrington, B. (2017). Trusts and financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 15, 31–63.

  48. 48.

    Clarkson, D., Jaecklin, S., & Kaczmarski, K. (2014). Domiciles of alternative investment funds. http://docshare01.docshare.tips/files/26926/269260073.pdf. Accessed 22 April 2020.

  49. 49.

    Bratton, W. W. (2007). Hedge funds and governance targets (Paper 862). Faculty Scholarship. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/862. Accessed 12 March 2020. (“Some specialize in securities of distressed firms, while others make directional bets on the movement of currency exchange or interest rates. Still others pursue convertible arbitrage, going long in a convertible bond and shorting the underlying common stock.”); Morley, J. (2013). The regulation of mutual fund debt. Yale Journal on Regulation, 30, 343–376.

  50. 50.

    Fichtner, J. (2016). The anatomy of the Cayman Islands Offshore Financial Center: Anglo-America, Japan, and the role of hedge funds. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 1034–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1243143.

  51. 51.

    Shadab, H. B. (2013). Hedge fund governance. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 19(1), 141–202. Some estimate that “around [eighty-five] percent of the world’s hedge funds are domiciled in the Cayman Islands.” Mourant, O. (2017). The Cayman Islands: A guide for hedge fund managers. https://www.mourant.com/file-library/media---2017/2017-guides/the-cayman-islands---a-guide-for-hedge-fund-managers.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2020.

  52. 52.

    Shadab, H. B. (2013). Hedge fund governance. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 19(1), 141–202.

  53. 53.

    SEC v. Gruss, 859 F. Supp. 2d 653, 658 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (describing a typical offshore fund structure, where the fund was “incorporated, administered, registered, domiciled and regulated in the Cayman Islands” whereas “the actual ‘operational and investment decisions for the Offshore Fund were all made by the Offshore Fund’s manager, DBZCO, primarily in DBZCO’s New York office’” (quoting Complaint ¶ 20, Gruss, 859 F. Supp. 2d 653)).

  54. 54.

    Cohen, A. R., & Williams, C. S. (2011). A comparison by practitioners of Delaware and Cayman Islands Limited partnerships. Bloomberg Finance L.P. Law Reports—Fund Management and Bloomberg Law Reports—Securities Law.

  55. 55.

    Lepree, S. A. (2008). Taxation of United States tax-exempt entities’ offshore hedge fund investments: Application of the Section 514 debt-financed rules to leveraged hedge funds and derivatives and the case for equalization. Tax Law, 61, 807–815.

  56. 56.

    Hammer, D. L. et al. (2005). US regulation of hedge funds. Chicago: ABA Book Publishing (focusing on the US tax issues for offshore hedge funds). Thus, for instance, US tax-exempt companies can face domestic tax liability on “unrelated business taxable income,” generally known under the name of “UBTI.” Offshore feeder funds, also known as blocker corporations, provide help in avoiding triggering this tax liability. This can be found in: Fund Associates. (2008). Offshore hedge funds vs. onshore hedge funds. http://fundassociates.com/pdfs/Offshore_vs_Onshore_Funds_Whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2020. In a similar manner, meanwhile a foreign investor may trigger tax liability for the simple fact that it can be seen as being engaged in a US business, the investment in an offshore feeder fund stops this possible exposure at the offshore level. In this respect, consult: Pepper, H. (2008). A practical guide to US tax compliance issues for hedge fund of funds. http://www.pepperlaw.com/uploads/files/fundoffunds_schneidman_1008.pdf. Accessed 29 February 2020.

  57. 57.

    Fichtner, J. (2016). The anatomy of the Cayman Islands Offshore Financial Center: Anglo-America, Japan, and the role of hedge funds. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 1034–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1243143.

  58. 58.

    Brocard, M., & Lhabitant, F. S. (2016). A primer on the tax framework of offshore and onshore hedge fund. Paris: EDHEC Risk Institute. https://www.edhec.edu/sites/www.edhec-portail.pprod.net/files/publications/pdf/edhec-working-paper-a-primer-on-the-tax-framework-f_1467203960443-pdfjpg. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  59. 59.

    Browning, L. (2007a, July 1). Offshore tax breaks lure money managers. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/01/business/yourmoney/01cay.html. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  60. 60.

    Trang, H. K. (2015, May 9). Why hedge funds love to go offshore. The Forbes. https://web.archive.org/web/20150516100546/http://www.forbes.com:80/sites/trangho/2015/05/09/why-hedge-funds-love-to-go-offshore/3. Accessed 6 April 2020.

  61. 61.

    Morley, J. (2014). The separation of funds and managers: A theory of investment fund structure and regulation. Yale Law Journal, 123, 1228–1253 (explaining the pattern of separating funds and managers for the purpose of limiting fund investors’ control rights to obtain greater profits).

  62. 62.

    Shadab, H. B. (2013). Hedge fund governance. Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance, 19(1), 141–202.

  63. 63.

    Fichtner, J. (2013). The rise of hedge funds: A story of inequality. Momentum Quarterly, 2(1), 3–20.

  64. 64.

    Enea, C., & Enea, C. (2015). Methods of taxation in the tax havens examples of taxation in the Bahamas, Bermuda, and the Cayman Islands. Annals of the “Constantin Brâncuşi” University of Târgu Jiu. Economy Series, Special Issue ECO-TREND 2015—Performance, Competitiveness, Creativity. Targu Jiu: “Academica Brâncuşi” Publisher.

  65. 65.

    Cohen, A. R., & Williams, C. S. (2011). A comparison by practitioners of Delaware and Cayman Islands Limited partnerships. Bloomberg Finance L.P. Law Reports—Fund Management and Bloomberg Law Reports—Securities Law.

  66. 66.

    Lhabitant F. S. (2006). Handbook of hedge funds. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., p. 28.

  67. 67.

    Idem, p. 28.

  68. 68.

    Brocard, M., & Lhabitant, F.S. (2016). A primer on the tax framework of offshore and onshore hedge fund. Paris: EDHEC Risk Institute. https://www.edhec.edu/sites/www.edhec-portail.pprod.net/files/publications/pdf/edhec-working-paper-a-primer-on-the-tax-framework-f_1467203960443-pdfjpg. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  69. 69.

    MF Law.

  70. 70.

    CIMA.

  71. 71.

    By the Cayman Islands Government. The MFL Amendment came into force on February 7, 2020 and provides a six-month transitional period (to 7 August 2020) for compliance for those s4(4) Funds in existence on February 7, 2020.

  72. 72.

    Private Funds Law. (2020). (Law 1 of 2020) Supplement No. 1 published with Legislation Gazette No. 9 dated 7 February, 2020. https://www.cima.ky/upimages/commonfiles/PrivateFundsLaw2020_1581524961.PDF. Accessed 12 April 2020.

  73. 73.

    That is, a fund that is itself a Regulated Fund, and conducts more than 51% of its investing through the master fund.

  74. 74.

    As Registered Funds.

  75. 75.

    Brocard, M., & Lhabitant, F. S. (2016). A primer on the tax framework of offshore and onshore hedge fund. Paris: EDHEC Risk Institute. https://www.edhec.edu/sites/www.edhec-portail.pprod.net/files/publications/pdf/edhec-working-paper-a-primer-on-the-tax-framework-f_1467203960443-pdfjpg. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  76. 76.

    This is a bilateral agreement between two parties implying the abolition of double taxation on active and passive income. In this respect, the Cayman Islands have signed a comprehensive tax treaty with Japan in 2010, and limited tax treaties with the United Kingdom and New Zealand. The Cayman Islands/UK double taxation arrangement (DTA) was signed in June 2009 and it entered into force in December 2010. It started to be effective in the Cayman Islands starting with April 2011 for the corporation tax and for the income and capital gains tax and from December 2010 for other taxes. See also Trepelkov, A., Tonino, H., & Halka, D. (Eds.) (2013). United Nations handbook on selected issues in administration of double tax treaties for developing countries. New York: United Nations. https://doi.org/10.18356/a96cf16b-en.

  77. 77.

    I.R.C. Section 882.

  78. 78.

    Brocard, M., & Lhabitant, F. S. (2016). A primer on the tax framework of offshore and onshore hedge funds. Paris: EDHEC Risk Institute, p. 21.

  79. 79.

    Exceptions include (i) gains realized from the sale or disposition of stock or non-debt securities of US real property holding corporations as defined in I.R.C. Section 897 (“USRPHCs”), including stock or securities of certain real estate investment trusts (“REITs”); and (ii) US lending activities, in particular loan negotiation and origination. See: Peaslee, J. M., & Nirenberg, D. Z. (2011). Federal income taxation of securitization transactions and related topics (4th ed). USA: Frank J. Fabozzi Associates Publisher.

  80. 80.

    I.R.C. Section 881.

  81. 81.

    The mutual legal assistance treaty between the United States and Cayman Islands specifically excludes fiscal matters.

  82. 82.

    “Entity Classification Election”.

  83. 83.

    Brocard, M., & Lhabitant, F. S. (2016). A primer on the tax framework of offshore and onshore hedge fund. Paris: EDHEC Risk Institute. https://www.edhec.edu/ sites/www.edhec-portail.pprod.net/files/publications/pdf/edhec-working-paper-a-primer-on-the-tax-framework-f_1467203960443-pdfjpg. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  84. 84.

    Brocard, M., & Lhabitant, F. S. (2016). A primer on the tax framework of offshore and onshore hedge fund. Paris: EDHEC Risk Institute. https://www.edhec.edu/sites/www.edhec-portail.pprod.net/files/publications/pdf/edhec-working-paper-a-primer-on-the-tax-framework-f_1467203960443-pdfjpg. Accessed 12 March 2020.

  85. 85.

    Office space, staff, etc.

  86. 86.

    Dyreng, S., Lindsey, B., & Thornock, J. (2012). Exploring the role Delaware plays as a tax haven (Working Paper WP 12/12). Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/centres/tax/papers/Docu-ments/WP1212.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2020.

  87. 87.

    Fichtner, J. (2013). The rise of hedge funds: A story of inequality. Momentum Quarterly, 2(1), 3–20.

  88. 88.

    Cumming, D., Dai, N., & Johan, S. A. (2015). Are hedge funds domiciled in Delaware different? Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 232–246.

  89. 89.

    Idem.

  90. 90.

    Baker, H. K., & Filbeck, G. (2017). Hedge funds structure, strategies, and performance. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.

  91. 91.

    Schwartz, R. (2012). Delaware as a location for private funds: The why and the what. Bloomberg World Securities Law Report, 18, 1–8.

  92. 92.

    Cumming, D., Dai, N., & Johan, S. A. (2015). Are hedge funds domiciled in Delaware different? Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 242.

  93. 93.

    Delaware Revised Uniform Partnership Act. https://delcode.delaware.gov/title6/c015/. Accessed 3 April 2020.

  94. 94.

    Cumming, D., Dai, N., & Johan, S. A. (2015). Are hedge funds domiciled in Delaware different? Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 243.

  95. 95.

    Fichtner, J. (2013). The rise of hedge funds: A story of inequality. Momentum Quarterly, 2(1), 3–20.

  96. 96.

    Moon, W. J. (2019). Regulating offshore finance. Vanderbilt Law Review, 72(1), 1–54.

  97. 97.

    Clarkson, D., Jaecklin, S., & Kaczmarski, K. (2014). Domiciles of alternative investment funds. http://www.alfi.lu/node/2814. Accessed 22 Apr 2020.

  98. 98.

    Lhabitant, F. S. (2006). Handbook of hedge funds. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., p. 87.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fagetan, A.M. (2021). The Non Regulation of Hedge Funds in Offshores Jurisdictions: Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Mauritius, and Delaware. In: The Regulation of Hedge Funds. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63706-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63706-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63705-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63706-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics