Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intraoperative Measures to Prevent Surgical Site Infections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infections in Surgery

Part of the book series: Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma ((HTACST))

  • 1490 Accesses

Abstract

The intraoperative period is characterized by the operative procedure with breach of the barrier function of the skin and, depending of the type of surgery, that of potentially contaminated hollow viscera. This exposes the patient to in- and external microorganisms that may cause infection of the surgical site. Consequences of general anesthesia and surgical stress may compromise defense mechanisms against these micro-organisms and further increase the risk of infection. Broadly, intraoperative measures can be categorized as aimed to minimize exposure to microorganisms, or to support physiological response against these microorganisms. Close collaboration with anesthesiologists and microbiologist is strongly recommended for an effective intraoperative infection prevention strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lister J. On the antiseptic principle in the practice of surgery. Br Med J. 1867;2(351):246–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Semmelweis IP. Die Aetiologie, der Begriff und die Prophylaxis des Kindbettfiebers. Pest, Wien & Leipzig: C. H. Hartleben; 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pasteur L. Recherches sur la putréfaction. Paris: Mallet-Bachelier; 1863.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ban KA, Minei JP, Laronga C, Harbrecht BG, Jensen EH, Fry DE, et al. American College of Surgeons and surgical infection society: surgical site infection guidelines, 2016 update. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(1):59–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  7. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Misteli H, Weber WP, Reck S, Rosenthal R, Zwahlen M, Fueglistaler P, et al. Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection. Arch Surg. 2009;144(6):553–8. discussion 8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner J, Dumville JC, Norman G, Fortnam M. Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1:CD004288.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tanner J, Norrie P, Melen K. Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11:CD004122.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Larson E. Guideline for use of topical antimicrobial agents. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16(6):253–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pivot D, Tiv M, Luu M, Astruc K, Aho S, Fournel I. Survey of intraoperative povidone-iodine application to prevent surgical site infection in a French region. J Hosp Infect. 2011;77(4):363–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Whiteside OJ, Tytherleigh MG, Thrush S, Farouk R, Galland RB. Intra-operative peritoneal lavage – who does it and why? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(4):255–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jonge SW, Boldingh QJJ, Solomkin JS, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Dellinger EP, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating prophylactic intra-operative wound irrigation for the prevention of surgical site infections. Surg Infect. 2017;18(4):508–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elek SD, Conen PE. The virulence of staphylococcus pyogenes for man; a study of the problems of wound infection. Br J Exp Pathol. 1957;38(6):573–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Matl FD, Zlotnyk J, Obermeier A, Friess W, Vogt S, Buchner H, et al. New anti-infective coatings of surgical sutures based on a combination of antiseptics and fatty acids. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2009;20(10):1439–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Obermeier A, Schneider J, Wehner S, Matl FD, Schieker M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, et al. Novel high efficient coatings for anti-microbial surgical sutures using chlorhexidine in fatty acid slow-release carrier systems. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101426.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Diener MK, Knebel P, Kieser M, Schüler P, Schiergens TS, Atanassov V, et al. Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9938):142–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bischoff P, Kubilay NZ, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Gastmeier P. Effect of laminar airflow ventilation on surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(5):553–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hopf HW, Hunt TK, West JM, Blomquist P, Goodson WH 3rd, Jensen JA, et al. Wound tissue oxygen tension predicts the risk of wound infection in surgical patients. Arch Surg. 1997;132(9):997–1004. discussion 5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen DB, Maguire JJ, Mahdavian M, Wicke C, Marcocci L, Scheuenstuhl H, et al. Wound hypoxia and acidosis limit neutrophil bacterial killing mechanisms. Arch Surg. 1997;132(9):991–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Greif R, Akça O, Horn EP, Kurz A, Sessler DI. Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(3):161–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Akca O, Ball L, Belda FJ, Biro P, Cortegiani A, Eden A, et al. WHO needs high FIO2? Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2017;45(4):181–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. de Jonge S, Egger M, Latif A, Loke YK, Berenholtz S, Boermeester M, et al. Effectiveness of 80% vs 30–35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(3):325–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattishent K, Thavarajah M, Sinha A, Peel A, Egger M, Solomkin J, et al. Safety of 80% vs 30–35% fraction of inspired oxygen in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(3):311–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. de Jonge SW, Hollmann MW. Perioperative use of high fraction of inspired oxygen: another null result? Anesth Analg. 2019;128(6):1071–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jonsson K, Jensen JA, Goodson WH 3rd, West JM, Hunt TK. Assessment of perfusion in postoperative patients using tissue oxygen measurements. Br J Surg. 1987;74(4):263–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Voldby AW, Brandstrup B. Fluid therapy in the perioperative setting-a clinical review. J Intensive Care. 2016;4:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shin CH, Long DR, McLean D, Grabitz SD, Ladha K, Timm FP, et al. Effects of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes: a hospital registry study. Ann Surg. 2018;267(6):1084–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thacker JK, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, Krukas MR, Mythen MM. Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample US surgical populations. Ann Surg. 2016;263(3):502–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, et al. Restrictive versus Liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(24):2263–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kabon B, Akca O, Taguchi A, Nagele A, Jebadurai R, Arkilic CF, et al. Supplemental intravenous crystalloid administration does not reduce the risk of surgical wound infection. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(5):1546–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearse RM, Harrison DA, MacDonald N, Gillies MA, Blunt M, Ackland G, et al. Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review. JAMA. 2014;311(21):2181–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rajagopalan S, Mascha E, Na J, Sessler DI. The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology. 2008;108(1):71–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R. Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of wound infection and temperature group. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(19):1209–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Melling AC, Ali B, Scott EM, Leaper DJ. Effects of preoperative warming on the incidence of wound infection after clean surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358(9285):876–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wong PF, Kumar S, Bohra A, Whetter D, Leaper DJ. Randomized clinical trial of perioperative systemic warming in major elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2007;94(4):421–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sessler DI. Mild perioperative hypothermia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(24):1730–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McAnulty GR, Robertshaw HJ, Hall GM. Anaesthetic management of patients with diabetes mellitus. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):80–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Turina M, Fry DE, Polk HC Jr. Acute hyperglycemia and the innate immune system: clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(7):1624–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kotagal M, Symons RG, Hirsch IB, Umpierrez GE, Dellinger EP, Farrokhi ET, et al. Perioperative hyperglycemia and risk of adverse events among patients with and without diabetes. Ann Surg. 2015;261(1):97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kiran RP, Turina M, Hammel J, Fazio V. The clinical significance of an elevated postoperative glucose value in nondiabetic patients after colorectal surgery: evidence for the need for tight glucose control? Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):599–604. discussion -5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vriesendorp TM, DeVries JH, van Santen S, Moeniralam HS, de Jonge E, Roos YB, et al. Evaluation of short-term consequences of hypoglycemia in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(11):2714–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Griesdale DE, de Souza RJ, van Dam RM, Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Malhotra A, et al. Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data. CMAJ. 2009;180(8):821–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. De Vries FE, Wallert ED, Solomkin JS, Allegranzi B, Egger M, Dellinger EP, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(36):e4673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    S. W. De Jonge

Authors
  1. S. W. De Jonge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. W. De Jonge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy

    Massimo Sartelli

  2. Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center - CECORC, Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA

    Raul Coimbra

  3. Department of infectious diseases, Ospedale di Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy

    Leonardo Pagani

  4. Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Centre, Kocaeli, Turkey

    Kemal Rasa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

De Jonge, S.W. (2021). Intraoperative Measures to Prevent Surgical Site Infections. In: Sartelli, M., Coimbra, R., Pagani, L., Rasa, K. (eds) Infections in Surgery. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62116-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62116-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62115-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62116-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation