Abstract
This chapter summarizes the pharmacokinetic principles that are essential in everyday clinical practice: Whenever initiating a dosage, changing a dosage, or upon cessation of a treatment, the new steady state of the medication (including its de facto elimination) is not reached before 4 elimination half-lives. Many neuropsychiatric medications have elimination half-lives around 24 h, so the clinician has to wait at least 4 days until the new effect intensity can be expected. On pharmacologic principle, medications with longer elimination half-lives should be preferred because their concentrations fluctuate less, producing less variation in effect strength and carrying a lower risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). With respect to pharmacodynamics, clinical studies in psychiatric institutions have been notoriously poor in demonstrating a relationship between the concentration of the prescribed medication and its effect on psychiatric symptoms. This chapter identifies the very likely reasons for this shortcoming of clinical trials: Concentration-effect relationships becomes less and less clear-cut as one proceeds from simple outcomes that are very much upstream in the biologic chain of events, for example, receptor occupancy or prolactin blood concentration, to a multifactored outcome such as symptom improvement. Investigators have to contend with “signal noise” contributed by placebo responders, placebo deteriorators, and nonresponders, especially as one moves from single center to multicenter trials. This chapter ends with a study design checklist to improve clinical trials investigating concentration-effect relationships of neuropsychiatric medications. With respect to the pharmacologic targets of neuropsychotropic medications (receptors, monoamine transporters, etc.), the reader is referred to the chapter “Adverse Drug Reactions, Intoxications and Interactions of Neuropsychotropic Medications”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ▮:
-
For reasons of easier accessibility through the search function of softwares, hyphens or subscripts are given in the text. Therefore, the 5HT1A receptor is given as “5HT1A receptor, or the compound “MK-801” simply as “MK801.”
- 5HT:
-
5-hydroxytryptamine = serotonin
- 5HT2A:
-
Serotonin receptor, subtype 2A = 5HT1A receptor = 5HT2A receptor
- 5HTT:
-
Serotonin transporter
- ADR:
-
Adverse drug reaction
- BPRS:
-
Brief psychiatric rating scale
- CGI-I:
-
Clinical global impressions, improvement scale
- D1, D2, etc.:
-
Dopamine receptor, subtype 1 = D1 receptor = D1 receptor
- DAT:
-
Dopamine transporter
- HAMD:
-
Hamilton depression rating scale
- HRSD:
-
Hamilton rating scale for depression
- NARI:
-
Noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (reboxetine)
- NaSSA:
-
Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressant (mirtazapine, mianserin)
- NAT:
-
Noradrenaline transporter, same as NET
- PANSS:
-
Positive and negative syndrome scale
- SERT:
-
Serotonin transporter
- SERTI:
-
Serotonin transporter inhibitor, see also SSRI
- SGA:
-
Second generation antipsychotic
- SPC:
-
Summary of product characteristics
- SNRI:
-
Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (e.g., duloxetine, venlafaxine)
- SSRI:
-
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (e.g., escitalopram)
References
Bauer LA. Applied clinical pharmacokinetics. New York: McGraw Hill; 2008.
Beasley CM Jr, Sanger T, Satterlee W, Tollefson G, Tran P, Hamilton S. Olanzapine versus placebo: results of a double-blind, fixed-dose olanzapine trial. Psychopharmacology. 1996a;124:159–67.
Beasley CM Jr, Tollefson G, Tran P, Satterlee W, Sanger T, Hamilton S. Olanzapine versus placebo and haloperidol: acute phase results of the north American double-blind olanzapine trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1996b;14:111–23.
Brunton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2017.
Callaghan JT, Bergstrom RF, Ptak LR, Beasley CM. Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;37:177–93.
Citrome L, Stauffer VL, Chen L, Kinon BJ, Kurtz DL, Jacobson JG, Bergstrom RF. Olanzapine plasma concentrations after treatment with 10, 20, and 40 mg/d in patients with schizophrenia: an analysis of correlations with efficacy, weight gain, and prolactin concentration. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29:278–83.
De Donatis D, Florio V, Porcelli S, Saria A, Mercolini L, Serretti A, Conca A. Duloxetine plasma level and antidepressant response. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;92:127–32.
Eggart V, Hiemke C, Zernig G. “There is no dose-response relationship in psychopharmacotherapy” vs “pharmacotherapy in psychiatry is based on ligand-receptor interaction”: a unifying hypothesis and the need for plasma concentration based clinical trials. Psychopharmacology. 2011;217:297–300.
Fellows L, Ahmad F, Castle DJ, Dusci LJ, Bulsara MK, Ilett KF. Investigation of target plasma concentration-effect relationships for olanzapine in schizophrenia. Ther Drug Monit. 2003;25:682–9.
Florio V, Porcelli S, Saria A, Serretti A, Conca A. Escitalopram plasma levels and antidepressant response. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;27:940–4.
Grunder G, Fellows C, Janouschek H, Veselinovic T, Boy C, Brocheler A, Kirschbaum KM, Hellmann S, Spreckelmeyer KM, Hiemke C, Rosch F, Schaefer WM, Vernaleken I. Brain and plasma pharmacokinetics of aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia: an [18F]fallypride PET study. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165:988–95.
Hiemke C. Concentration-effect relationships of psychoactive drugs and the problem to calculate therapeutic reference ranges. Ther Drug Monit. 2019;41:174–9.
Hiemke C, Bergemann N, Broich K, Clement HW, Conca A, Deckert J, Dietmaier O, Domschke K, Eckermann G, Egberts K, Fric M, Gerlach M, Greiner C, Grunder G, Haen E, Havemann-Reinecke U, Janssen G, Jaquenoud Sirot E, Laux G, Messer T, Mossner R, Muller MJ, Paulzen M, Pfuhlmann B, Riederer P, Saria A, Schoppek B, Schwarz M, Stegmann B, Steimer W, Stingl J, Uhr M, Ulrich S, Unterecker S, Waschgler R, Zernig G, Zurek G, Baumann P. AGNP consensus guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring in psychiatry and neurology: update 2017. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2018;51:9–62.
Kapur S, Zipursky RB, Remington G, Jones C, Dasilva J, Wilson AA, Houle S. 5-HT2 and D2 receptor occupancy of olanzapine in schizophrenia: a PET investigation. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:921–8.
Kapur S, Zipursky R, Jones C, Remington G, Houle S. Relationship between dopamine D(2) occupancy, clinical response, and side effects: a double-blind PET study of first-episode schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:514–20.
Kaufmann A, Wartelsteiner F, Yalcin-Siedentopf N, Baumgartner S, Biedermann F, Edlinger M, Kemmler G, Rettenbacher MA, Rissanen TT, Widschwendter CG, Zernig G, Fleischhacker WW, Hofer A. Changes in psychopathology in schizophrenia patients starting treatment with new-generation antipsychotics: therapeutic drug monitoring in a naturalistic treatment setting. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;26:717–28.
Kaufmann A, Post F, Yalcin-Siedentopf N, Baumgartner S, Biedermann F, Edlinger M, Kemmler G, Rettenbacher MA, Widschwendter CG, Zernig G, Fleischhacker WW, Hofer A. Corrigendum to “Changes in psychopathology in schizophrenia patients starting treatment with new-generation antipsychotics: therapeutic drug monitoring in a naturalistic treatment setting” [Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 26 (2016) 717–728]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;31:162–3.
Kenakin TP. A pharmacology primer. Theory, applications, and methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2009.
Kinon BJ, Volavka J, Stauffer V, Edwards SE, Liu-Seifert H, Chen L, Adams DH, Lindenmayer JP, Mcevoy JP, Buckley PF, Lieberman JA, Meltzer HY, Wilson DR, Citrome L. Standard and higher dose of olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28:392–400.
Mauri MC, Steinhilber CP, Marino R, Invernizzi E, Fiorentini A, Cerveri G, Baldi ML, Barale F. Clinical outcome and olanzapine plasma levels in acute schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2005;20:55–60.
Meyer JH, Wilson AA, Sagrati S, Hussey D, Carella A, Potter WZ, Ginovart N, Spencer EP, Cheok A, Houle S. Serotonin transporter occupancy of five selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors at different doses: an [11C]DASB positron emission tomography study. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:826–35.
Muller MJ, Regenbogen B, Hartter S, Eich FX, Hiemke C. Therapeutic drug monitoring for optimizing amisulpride therapy in patients with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41:673–9.
Perry PJ, Sanger T, Beasley C. Olanzapine plasma concentrations and clinical response in acutely ill schizophrenic patients. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997;17:472–7.
Perry PJ, Lund BC, Sanger T, Beasley C. Olanzapine plasma concentrations and clinical response: acute phase results of the North American olanzapine trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001;21:14–20.
Preskorn SH. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in psychiatry (part I): why studies attempting to correlate drug concentration and antidepressant response don’t work. J Psychiatr Pract. 2014;20:133–7.
Spina E, Avenoso A, Facciola G, Scordo MG, Ancione M, Madia AG, Ventimiglia A, Perucca E. Relationship between plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine and therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia resistant to conventional neuroleptics. Psychopharmacology. 2000;148:83–9.
Stahl SM. Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: neuroscientific basis and practical application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
Tanum L, Strand LP, Refsum H. Serum concentrations of citalopram – dose-dependent variation in R- and S-enantiomer ratios. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2010;43:190–3.
Tasker TC, Kaye CM, Zussman BD, Link CG. Paroxetine plasma levels: lack of correlation with efficacy or adverse events. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1989;350:152–5.
Wagner JG. Pharmacokinetics for the pharmaceutical scientist. Missionsstrasse 44, CH-4055. Basel: Technomic Publishing AG; 1993.
Walker EA, Zernig G, Woods JH. Buprenorphine antagonism of mu opioids in the rhesus monkey tail-withdrawal procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995;273:1345–52.
Walker EA, Zernig G, Young AM. In vivo apparent affinity and efficacy estimates for mu opiates in a rat tail-withdrawal assay. Psychopharmacology. 1998;136:15–23.
Welling PG. Pharmacokinetics. Processes and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1986.
Zernig G, Issaevitch T, Broadbear J, Burke T, Lewis JW, Brine GA, Woods JH. Receptor reserve and affinity of mu opioid agonists in mouse antinociception: correlation with receptor binding. Life Sci. 1995;57:2113–25.
Zernig G, Issaevitch T, Woods JH. Calculation of agonist efficacy, apparent affinity and receptor population changes after administration of insurmountable antagonists: comparison of different analytical approaches. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1996;35:223–37.
Zernig G, Lewis JW, Woods JH. Clocinnamox inhibits the intravenous self-administration of opioid agonists in rhesus monkeys: comparison with effects on opioid agonist-mediated antinociception. Psychopharmacology. 1997;129(3):233–42.
Zernig G, Ahmed SH, Cardinal RN, Morgan D, Acquas E, Foltin RW, Vezina P, Negus SS, Crespo JA, Stoeckl P, Grubinger P, Madlung E, Haring C, Kurz M, Saria A. Explaining the escalation of drug use in substance dependence: models and appropriate animal laboratory tests. Pharmacology. 2007;80:65–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zernig, G., Hiemke, C. (2022). Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles. In: Riederer, P., Laux, G., Nagatsu, T., Le, W., Riederer, C. (eds) NeuroPsychopharmacotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62059-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62059-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62058-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62059-2
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine