Abstract
Organisational learning (OL) perspectives suggest that all organisations use evidence to adapt and change their policies and practices. The special case of how police organisations adapt and change in response to experiences with the implementation of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is, however, not well understood in the extant literature. The value of policing RCTs may, on the one hand, lie in their ability to provide hard evidence or results of ‘what works’ in policing. On the other hand, RCTs may be powerful change processes which serve to generate OL and potential service improvements even in the absence of results. This paper presents an analysis of the results of in-depth interviews conducted in a policing organisation that has implemented a RCT. Using an integrated perspective of OL, we show that processes related to the experience with implementing a RCT may have a specific potential to leverage organisational change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Argote, L. (1999). Organisational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organisational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organisation Science, 22(5), 1123–1137.
Argyris, C. (1994). On organisational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Argyris, C. (2004). Reasons and rationalizations: The limits to organisational knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Argyris, C., & Schőn, D. A. (1978). Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Argyris, C., & Schőn, D. A. (1989). Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. The American Behavioral Scientist, 32(5), 612–623.
Argyris, C., & Schőn, D. A. (1996). Organisational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bedford, L. (2017). Randomised controlled field trials in policing: An organisational learning perspective. Unpublished dissertation for PhD, Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland.
Bedford, L., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Beyond the evidence: Organisational learning from RCTs in policing. Policing, 8(4), 402–416.
Burke, W. W. (2002). Organisational change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clarke, R. V. G., & Cornish, D. B. (1972). The controlled trial in institutional research: Paradigm or pitfall for penal evaluators? London: HM Stationery Office.
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–153.
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organisational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organisations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.
Hedberg, B. (1981). How organisations learn and unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organisational design (Vol. 1, pp. 3–27). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organisational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organisation Science, 2(1), 88–115.
Lewin, K. (1951). In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper and Row.
Lum, C., Telep, C. W., Koper, C. S., & Grieco, J. (2012). Receptivity to research in policing. Justice Research and Policy, 14(1), 61–96.
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
Moingeon, B., & Edmondson, A. (1996). When to learn how and when to learn why: Appropriate organisational learning processes as a source of competitive advantage. In B. Moingeon & A. Edmondson (Eds.), Organisational learning and competitive advantage (pp. 17–37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Neyroud, P., & Weisburd, D. (2014). Transforming the police through science: The challenge of ownership. Policing, 8(4), 287–293.
Neyroud, P. W. (2016). Researching the police: Inside-outside perspectives in a new world of police professionalism and practitioner research. In M. Cowburn, L. Gelsthorpe, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Research ethics in criminology: Dilemmas, issues and solutions (pp. 77–95). London: Routledge.
Neyroud, P. W. (2017) Learning to field test in policing: Using an analysis of completed randomised controlled trials involving the police to develop a grounded theory on the factors contributing to high levels of treatment integrity in police field experiments. Unpublished dissertation for PhD, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organisational knowledge creation. Organisation Science, 5(1), 14–47.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Shepherd, J. P. (2003). Explaining feast or famine in randomized field trials: Medical science and criminology compared. Evaluation Review, 27(3), 290–315.
Sherman, L. W. (2010). An introduction to experimental criminology. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 399–437). New York: Springer.
Shipton, H. (2006). Cohesion or confusion? Towards a typology for organisational learning research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(4), 233–252.
Simon, H. (1991). Bounded rationality and organisational learning. Organisation Science, 2(1), 125–134.
Skogan, W. (2008). Why reforms fail. Policing and Society, 18(1), 23–34.
Slothower, M. (2014a). Strengthening police professionalism with decision support: Bounded discretion in out-of-court disposals. Policing, 8(4), 353–367.
Slothower, M. (2014b). Victim satisfaction and perceptions of police and criminal justice legitimacy: Mediating impacts of perceptions of problem-solving motive achievement and matching. Unpublished M.Phil. Thesis, University of Maryland.
Slothower, M. P., Sherman, L. W., & Neyroud, P. W. (2015). Tracking quality of police actions in a victim contact program: A case study in training, tracking and feedback (TTF) in evidence-based policing. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(1), 98–116.
Sparrow, M. K. (2011). Governing science. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Starbuck, W. (1984). Organisations as action generators. Americal Sociological Review, 48, 91–102.
Tsang, E. W. K. (1997). Organisational learning and the learning organisation: A dichotomy between descriptive and prescriptive research. Human Relations, 50(1), 73–89.
Weisburd, D., & Neyroud, P. W. (2011). Police science: Toward a new paradigm. New perspectives in policing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
Weisburd D., Petrosino A.& Fronius T. (2014). Randomized experiments in criminology and criminal justice. In: Bruinsma G., Weisburd D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Springer, New York, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bedford, L., Neyroud, P. (2021). Organizational Learning from Field Research in Policing: How Police Can Improve Policy and Practice by Implementing Randomized Controlled Trials. In: Albrecht, J.F., den Heyer, G. (eds) Enhancing Police Service Delivery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61452-2_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61452-2_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61293-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61452-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)