Skip to main content

Attitudes and Preferences of University Student Bicyclists: The Tale of Two Greek Cities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems (CSUM 2020)

Abstract

Recently, the share of bicycles among transportation modes has been rising. This is also the case in university campuses that have seen an increase of bicycling as a transport mode. Transportation authorities globally encourage bicycling as a way for pollution reduction and alleviation of traffic congestion. However, lack of bicycle facilities could significantly hinder increase in bicycling levels. This study used in-person surveys to evaluate the attitudes and desires of bicyclists in two university campuses in Greece: Thessaloniki and Volos. The goal of the survey was to identify barriers to bicycling in both cities and pinpoint facility aspects that could be improved. Descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing were utilized in the analysis of the survey data to determine the level of agreement among participant responses and document their attitudes and preferences. Lack of bicycling facilities was the main impediment that respondents in both cities identified: a finding that agrees with prior research. In addition, the aggressive behavior of car drivers is considered an important obstacle in both cities. The survey findings support to the notion that bicyclists everywhere have similar attitudes about what the types of improvements required for increasing bicycling and enhancing their experiences. In addition, local conditions and practices have an impact on the relevance of specific issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Conference of Ministers of Transport: Safety in road traffic for vulnerable users. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD, Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Directorate General for Internal Policies: The Promotion Of Cycling. European Parliament, Brussels (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport: Attitudes of Europeans towards urban mobility. Eurobarometer 406 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pucher, J., Buelher, R., Seinee, M.: Bicycling renaissance in North America? an update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transp. Res. Part A 45, 451–475 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pucher, J., Dill, J., Handy, S.: Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Prev. Med. 50, 106–125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Broach, J., Dill, J., Gliebe, J.: Where do cyclists ride? a route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transp. Res. Part A 46, 1730–1740 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang, L., Fricker, J.: Bicyclist commuters’ choice of on-street versus off-street route segments. Transportation 40, 887–902 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buehler, R., Pucher, J.: Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bicycle paths and lanes. Transportation 39, 409–432 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikiforiadis, A., Basbas, S.: Can pedestrians and cyclists share the same space? the case of a city with low cycling levels and experience. Sustain. Cities Soc. 46, 101453 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aultman-Hall, L., Hall, F., Baetz, B.: Analysis of bicycle commuter routes using geographic information systems: implications for bicycle planning. Transp. Res. Rec. 1578, 102–110 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dill, J., Carr, T.: Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: if you build them, commuters will use them-another look. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 116–123 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parkin, J., Wardman, M., Page, M.: Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation 35, 93–109 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schroeder, P., Wilbur, M.: 2012 National Survey of Bicyclist and Pedestrian Attitudes and Behavior. Volume 1: Summary Report. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Forsyth, A., Krizek, K.J., Agrawal, A.W.: Measuring walking and cycling using the PABS (Pedestrian and Bicycling Survey) approach: a low-cost survey method for local communities. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilmore Research Group: Public Attitude Survey of Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning. Wilbur Smith Associates Bellevue, Washington, DC (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project. http://bikepeddocumentation.org/index.php, Accessed 15 Feb 2020

  17. Thiemann-Linden, J., Mettenberger, T.: Cycling Quality Management and Evaluation in Europe. Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Check, J., Schutt, R.K.: Survey research. In: Check, J., Schutt., R.K. (eds.) Research Methods in Education, pp. 159–185. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stamatiadis, N., Pappalardo, G., Cafiso, S.: Use of technology to improve bicycle mobility in smart cities. In: 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems, Napoli (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/mtits.2017.8005636

  21. Cafiso, S., Di Graziano, A., Pappalardo, G.: Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety. Saf. Sci. 57, 254–263 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikiforiadis, A., Basbas, S., Garyfalou, M.I.: A methodology for the assessment of pedestrians-cyclists shared space level of service. J. Clean. Prod. 254, 120172 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was completed as part of a Fulbright Fellowship grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Nikiforiadis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Stamatiadis, N. et al. (2021). Attitudes and Preferences of University Student Bicyclists: The Tale of Two Greek Cities. In: Nathanail, E.G., Adamos, G., Karakikes, I. (eds) Advances in Mobility-as-a-Service Systems. CSUM 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1278. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61075-3_91

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61075-3_91

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61074-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61075-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics