Skip to main content

Ethical Considerations and Psychological Evaluation in Elective Amputation for Brachial Plexus Injuries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bionic Limb Reconstruction
  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

Elective amputation and prosthetic reconstruction of a nonfunctional limb provide a treatment strategy in cases where other medical interventions failed to achieve functional improvements. Since this is an irreversible, life-changing event, the process of decision-making before the procedure is a key element in ethical action. The intervention is only considered if the medical and psychological status of the patient indicates it and the patient himself expresses the desire to undergo bionic reconstruction. To allow an informed decision of the patient, clinicians need to clearly communicate the current clinical situation and give realistic expectations of different treatment options. Additional psychological evaluation and a waiting period allow the patient to reflect his considerations for undergoing amputation and provide the psychologist with valuable information about possible contraindication. While psychological counseling usually ends with a final session after the elective amputation, it can be restarted in case of psychosocial problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aszmann OC, Roche AD, Salminger S, Paternostro-Sluga T, Herceg M, Sturma A, Hofer C, Farina D. Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown PW. Sacrifice of the unsatisfactory hand. J Hand Surg. 1979;4(5):417–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grob M, Papadopulos NA, Zimmermann A, Biemer E, Kovacs L. The Psychological Impact of Severe Hand Injuries. J Hand Surge. 2008;33(3):358–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hruby LA, Pittermann A, Sturma A, Aszmann OC. The Vienna psychosocial assessment procedure for bionic reconstruction in patients with global brachial plexus injuries. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189592. https://doi.org/10.1371/0189592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hruby LA, Sturma A, Mayer JA, Pittermann A, Salminger S, Aszmann OC. Algorithm for bionic hand reconstruction in patients with global brachial plexopathies. J Neurosurg. 2017;27(5):1163–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, Rumpold G, Weissenbacher A, Hautz T, Engelhardt TO, Brandacher G, Gabl M, Ninkovic M, Rieger M, Zelger B, Blautz M, Margreiter R, Pierer G, Pratschke J, Schneeberger. The psychological assessment of candidates for reconstructive hand transplantation. Transpl Int. 2012;25(5):573–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, Moreno E, Brandacher G, Azari K, Rumpold G. An overview of psychosocial assessment procedures in reconstructive hand transplantation. Transpl Int. 2014;27(5):417–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, Lao J, Gao K, Gu Y, Xin Z. Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of 28 patients by DASH and NRS questionnaires. J Hand Surg. 2012;37(5):413–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer A, Kudar K, Bretz K, Tihanyi J. Body schema and body awareness of amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32(3):363–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol. 2005;10(3):425–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quan DL, Dudek NL, Marks M, Boutet M, Varpio L. A qualitative study of factors influencing the decision to have an elective amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2087–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith JK, Myers KP, Holloway RG, Landau ME. Ethical considerations in elective amputation after traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. Neurol Clin Pract. 2014;4(4):280–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Pittermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pittermann, A., Hruby, L.A., Sturma, A., Aszmann, O.C. (2021). Ethical Considerations and Psychological Evaluation in Elective Amputation for Brachial Plexus Injuries. In: Aszmann, O.C., Farina, D. (eds) Bionic Limb Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60746-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60746-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60745-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60746-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics