Abstract
Elective amputation and prosthetic reconstruction of a nonfunctional limb provide a treatment strategy in cases where other medical interventions failed to achieve functional improvements. Since this is an irreversible, life-changing event, the process of decision-making before the procedure is a key element in ethical action. The intervention is only considered if the medical and psychological status of the patient indicates it and the patient himself expresses the desire to undergo bionic reconstruction. To allow an informed decision of the patient, clinicians need to clearly communicate the current clinical situation and give realistic expectations of different treatment options. Additional psychological evaluation and a waiting period allow the patient to reflect his considerations for undergoing amputation and provide the psychologist with valuable information about possible contraindication. While psychological counseling usually ends with a final session after the elective amputation, it can be restarted in case of psychosocial problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aszmann OC, Roche AD, Salminger S, Paternostro-Sluga T, Herceg M, Sturma A, Hofer C, Farina D. Bionic reconstruction to restore hand function after brachial plexus injury: a case series of three patients. Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2183–9.
Brown PW. Sacrifice of the unsatisfactory hand. J Hand Surg. 1979;4(5):417–23.
Grob M, Papadopulos NA, Zimmermann A, Biemer E, Kovacs L. The Psychological Impact of Severe Hand Injuries. J Hand Surge. 2008;33(3):358–62.
Hruby LA, Pittermann A, Sturma A, Aszmann OC. The Vienna psychosocial assessment procedure for bionic reconstruction in patients with global brachial plexus injuries. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0189592. https://doi.org/10.1371/0189592.
Hruby LA, Sturma A, Mayer JA, Pittermann A, Salminger S, Aszmann OC. Algorithm for bionic hand reconstruction in patients with global brachial plexopathies. J Neurosurg. 2017;27(5):1163–71.
Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, Rumpold G, Weissenbacher A, Hautz T, Engelhardt TO, Brandacher G, Gabl M, Ninkovic M, Rieger M, Zelger B, Blautz M, Margreiter R, Pierer G, Pratschke J, Schneeberger. The psychological assessment of candidates for reconstructive hand transplantation. Transpl Int. 2012;25(5):573–85.
Kumnig M, Jowsey SG, Moreno E, Brandacher G, Azari K, Rumpold G. An overview of psychosocial assessment procedures in reconstructive hand transplantation. Transpl Int. 2014;27(5):417–27.
Liu Y, Lao J, Gao K, Gu Y, Xin Z. Outcome of nerve transfers for traumatic complete brachial plexus avulsion: results of 28 patients by DASH and NRS questionnaires. J Hand Surg. 2012;37(5):413–21.
Mayer A, Kudar K, Bretz K, Tihanyi J. Body schema and body awareness of amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2008;32(3):363–82.
Murray CD. The social meanings of prosthesis use. J Health Psychol. 2005;10(3):425–41.
Quan DL, Dudek NL, Marks M, Boutet M, Varpio L. A qualitative study of factors influencing the decision to have an elective amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:2087–92.
Smith JK, Myers KP, Holloway RG, Landau ME. Ethical considerations in elective amputation after traumatic peripheral nerve injuries. Neurol Clin Pract. 2014;4(4):280–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pittermann, A., Hruby, L.A., Sturma, A., Aszmann, O.C. (2021). Ethical Considerations and Psychological Evaluation in Elective Amputation for Brachial Plexus Injuries. In: Aszmann, O.C., Farina, D. (eds) Bionic Limb Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60746-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60746-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60745-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60746-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)