Abstract
In this short closing chapter, three-dimensional simulation results have been presented with the anisotropic hybrid k-\(\omega \) Shear-Stress Transport/Stochastic Turbulence Model (SST/STM) [16] to make an attempt and a first step towards more complex real-world engineering applications. Therefore, the objective of this chapter is to shed light on possible research areas where further improvements can be made as a future work on the new anisotropic turbulence modelling approach investigated in this book. Numerical simulations are performed for three-dimensional turbulent flows (a) in a horizontal smooth cylindrical pipe, (b) over a NACA 0013 wing and (c) over the Jetstream 31 aircraft, respectively. All simulation results are compared to the k-\(\omega \) SST model [20,21,22] and experimental data. The anisotropic scale factors \(\lambda _{11}^{\star }\), \(\lambda _{22}^{\star }\) and \(\lambda _{33}^{\star }\) in the modified deviatoric similarity tensor \(\underline{\underline{H}}^{\star }\) (3.99) have been calibrated and validated for three-dimensional turbulent flows related to the experimental work of Laufer [17] in a straight smooth cylindrical pipe. In that case, the anisotropic hybrid k-\(\omega \) SST/STM approach [16] captured the physically correct anisotropic Reynolds stress distributions for \(y^{+}\gtrapprox 65\). The simulation results suggest that the values of these scale factors have to be higher in the near wall region \((y^{+}\lessapprox 65)\) than in the inertial sublayer to obtain the accurate order of magnitude of the anisotropic Reynolds stresses. For the NACA 0013 wing and the Jetstream 31 aircraft external flows, the lift coefficient \(c_{l}\) (4.60) values were under-predicted with the k-\(\omega \) SST [20,21,22] and the anisotropic hybrid k-\(\omega \) SST/STM [16] models compared to the experimental data in [8, 28]. The results suggest that further investigations on the mathematical properties of the modified deviatoric similarity tensor \(\underline{\underline{H}}^{\star }\) (3.97) related to the anisotropic scale factors \(\lambda _{11}^{\star }\), \(\lambda _{22}^{\star }\) and \(\lambda _{33}^{\star }\) are recommended as a future work.
We must learn to live with contradictions, because they lead to deeper and more effective understanding.
- Edward Teller, 1998
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ANSYS I (2018) ANSYS fluent theory guide, release 19.1. ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, PA, USA
ANSYS I (2018) ANSYS fluent user’s guide, release 19.1. ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, PA, USA
Arias de Saavedra JMG, Acher GR (2012) Introducción a la Aerodinámica Potencial. Ediciones Paraninfo, S. a, Spain. ISBN -13: 978-8497329941
Bailly C, Comte-Bellot G (2015) Turbulence. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Experimental Fluid Mechanics. ISBN 978-3-319-16159-4
Boussinesq J (1877) Théorie de l’Ecoulement tourbillant. Mem Présentés par Divers Savants Acad Sci Inst Fr 23:46–50
Bradshaw P (1967) The turbulence structure of equilibrium boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 29(Part 4):625–645
Bradshaw P, Ferriss DH, Atwell NP (1967) Calculation of boundary-layer development using the turbulent energy equation. J Fluid Mech 28(Part 3):593–616
Casadei L, Könözsy L, Lawson NJ (2019) Unsteady detached-eddy simulation (DES) of the jetstream 31 aircraft in one engine inoperative (OEI) condition with propeller modelling. Aerosp Sci Technol 91:287–300
Cooke AK (2013) Data pack for the jetstream 31. Flight Dynamics Principles Assignment, Unpublished, Cranfield University, UK
Czibere T (2001) Researches on turbulence 1991-2001 (in Hungarian), Lecture notes for PhD students, manuscript, University of Miskolc, Department of fluid and heat engineering, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, H-3515, Hungary
Davidson PA (2004) Turbulence. an introduction for scientists and engineers. Oxford University Press Inc, New York, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-852949-1
Hughes WF, Brighton JA (1999) Theory and problems of fluid dynamics, 3rd edn. Schaum’s outline series. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, New York, USA. ISBN 0-07-031118-8
Jacques H (2014) Simulation of propeller effects on the jetstream 31 aircraft. Master’s thesis, MSc Thesis, Cranfield University, UK
Klebanoff PS (1955) Characteristics of turbulence in a boundary layer with zero pressure gradient. NACA technical report 1247
Klebanoff PS, Diehl ZW (1951) Some features of artificially thickened fully developed turbulent bounary layers with zero pressure gradient. NACA technical note 2475
Könözsy L (2019) A new hypothesis on the anisotropic reynolds stress tensor for turbulent flows, volume I: theoretical background and development of an anisotropic hybrid k-omega shear-stress transport/stochastic turbulence model, fluid mechanics and its application, vol 120, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. ISBN 978-3-030-13542-3
Laufer J (1954) The structure of turbulence in fully developed pipe flow. NACA technical report 1174
Lawson NJ, Jacques H, Gautrey JE, Cooke AK, Holt JC, Garry KP (2017) Jetstream 31 national flying laboratory: lift and drag measurement and modelling. Aerosp Sci Technol 60:84–95
Lino M (2010) Numerical investigation of propeller-wing interaction effects for a large military transport aircraft, MSc Thesis. Master’s thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Menter FR (1992) Improved two-equation k-\(\omega \) turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. NASA technical memorandum 103975, pp 1–31
Menter FR (1994) Improved two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):1598–1605
Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R (2003) 4th internal symposium, turbulence, heat and mass transfer, 2003, Antalya, Turkey, vol 4, Begell House, Inc., New York, Wallingford, chap Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model, pp 625–632. ISBN 1567001963
Nikuradse J (1932) Gesetzmässigkeiten der turbulenten Strömung in glatten Rohren. Forsch Arb Ing-Wes, No 356, Ed B 3:1–36, English translation: Laws of turbulent flow in smooth pipes, NASA TT F-10, 359, 1966
Prandtl L (1933) Neuere Ergebnisse der Turbulenzforschung. Zeitschrift des Vereines deutscher Ingenieure 7(5):105–114, English translation: NACA-TM-720, 1933
Roache PJ (1998) Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Hermosa Publishers, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
Rohsenow WM, Hartnett JP, Cho YI (eds) (1998) Handbook of heat transfer, 3 edn. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, New York, USA. ISBN 0-07-053555-8
Schlichting H (1982) Boundary layer theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
Teschner TR (2012) A comparative study between winglet and raked wingtip wing configurations. BSc Thesis, Hamburg university of applied sciences, Department of automotive and aeronautical engineering, Hamburg, Germany pp 1–62
von Kármán T (1930) Mechanische Ähnlichkeit und Turbulenz. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, pp 58–76
von Kármán T (1931) Mechanical similitude and turbulence. National advisory committee for aeronautics (N A C A) Technical memorandum No 611, Washington, USA; English Translation by Vanier, J pp 1–21
von Kármán T (1956) Collected Works of Theodore von Kármán. Volume II. 1914-1932, Butterworths Scientific Publications: London, United Kingdom, chap Mechanische Ähnlichkeit und Turbulenz, pp 322–336
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Könözsy, L. (2021). Three-Dimensional Simulations with an Anisotropic Hybrid k-\(\omega \) SST/STM Approach. In: A New Hypothesis on the Anisotropic Reynolds Stress Tensor for Turbulent Flows. Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60603-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60603-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60602-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60603-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)