Skip to main content

Prostate Sparing Cystectomy: A Systematic Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

Part of the book series: Management of Urology ((MU))

  • 439 Accesses

Abstract

A systematic review relating to muscle invasive bladder cancer and radical cystectomy in the elderly was conducted. This was to identify whether radical cystectomy has a role in this cohort. This chapter covers a modification of technique- prostate sparing cystectomy, seminal sparing cystectomy, oncological outcomes of prostate sparing cystectomy, risk of prostate/urothelial cancer in prostate sparing cystectomy, functional outcomes post prostate sparing cystectomy, erectile function after prostate sparing cystectomy, post-operative complications after prostate sparing cystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The Prisma Statement.” [In English]. BMJ (Online) 339, no. 7716 (08 Aug 2009):332–36.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. “Systematically Reviewing Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence to Inform Management and Policy-Making in the Health Field.” [In English]. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10, no. SUPPL. 1 (July 2005):6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rivas JG, Gregorio SA, Gómez ÁT, Alvarez-Maestro M, Sebastián JD, Ledo JC. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with prostate capsule sparing. Initial experience. Cent Eur J Urol. 2016;69(1):25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colombo R, Pellucchi F, Moschini M, Gallina A, Bertini R, Salonia A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Fifteen-year single-centre experience with three different surgical procedures of nerve-sparing cystectomy in selected organ-confined bladder cancer patients. World J Urol. 2015;33(10):1389–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Muto G, Collura D, Rosso R, Giacobbe A, Muto GL, Castelli E. Seminal-sparing cystectomy: technical evolution and results over a 20-year period. Urology. 2014;83(4):856–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Botto H, Sebe P, Molinie V, Herve JM, Yonneau L, Lebret T. Prostatic capsule- and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder carcinoma: initial results for selected patients. BJU Int. 2004;94(7):1021–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ong CH, Schmitt M, Thalmann GN, Studer UE. Individualized seminal vesicle sparing cystoprostatectomy combined with ileal orthotopic bladder substitution achieves good functional results. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Voskuilen CS, Fransen van de Putte EE, Pérez-Reggeti JI, van Werkhoven E, Mertens LS, van Rhijn BWG, Saad M, Bex A, Cathelineau X, van der Poel HG, Horenblas S, Sanchez-Salas R, Meijer RP. Prostate sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer: a two-center study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(9):1446–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, Ijzerman W, Moonen LF. Sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder: initial results. J Urol. 2001;166(3):837–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weizer AZ, Shah RB, Lee CT, Gilbert SM, Daignault S, Montie JE, Wood DP Jr. Evaluation of the prostate peripheral zone/capsule in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy: defining risk with prostate capsule sparing cystectomy. Urol Oncol. 2007;25(6):460–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Meinhardt W, Horenblas S. Clinical outcomes after sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder (prostate sparing cystectomy) in 44 patients. J Urol. 2005;173(4):1314–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Komyakov BK, Sergeev AV, Fadeev VA, Ismailov KI, Ulyanov AY, Shmelev AY, Onoshko MV. [Concomitant oncopathological changes in the prostate of urinary bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystoprostateectomy]. Urologiia. 2017;(4):42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ruffion A, Manel A, Massoud W, Decaussin M, Berger N, Paparel P, Morel-Journel N, Lopez JG, Champetier D, Devonec M, Perrin P. Preservation of prostate during radical cystectomy: evaluation of prevalence of prostate cancer associated with bladder cancer. Urology. 2005;65(4):703–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdelhady M, Abusamra A, Pautler SE, Chin JL, Izawa JI. Clinically significant prostate cancer found incidentally in radical cystoprostatectomy specimens. BJU Int. 2007;99(2):326–9. Epub 2006 Oct 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gakis G, Schilling D, Bedke J, Sievert KD, Stenzl A. Incidental prostate cancer at radical cystoprostatectomy: implications for apex-sparing surgery. BJU Int. 2010;105(4):468–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nour H, Abdelrazak O, Wishahy M, Elkatib S, Botto H. Prostate-sparing cystectomy: potential functional advantages and objective oncological risks; a case series and review. Arab J Urol. 2011;9(2):107–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meinhardt W, Horenblas S. Sexuality preserving cystectomy and neobladder (SPCN): functional results of a neobladder anastomosed to the prostate. Eur Urol. 2003;43(6):646–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sèbe P, Traxer O, Cussenot O, Haab F, Thibault P, Gattegno B. [Cystectomy with preservation of the prostate in the treatment of bladder tumours: anatomical basis, surgical techniques, indications and results]. Prog Urol. 2003;13(6):1279–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen PY, Chiang PH. Comparisons of quality of life and functional and oncological outcomes after orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: prostate-sparing cystectomy versus conventional radical cystoprostatectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1983428.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Davila HH, Weber T, Burday D, Thurman S, Carrion R, Salup R, Lockhart JL. Total or partial prostate sparing cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: long-term implications on erectile function. BJU Int. 2007;100(5):1026–9. Epub 2007 Sept 14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Terrone C, Cracco C, Scarpa RM, Rossetti SR. Supra-ampullar cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and ileal orthotopic reservoir for bladder tumor: twenty years of experience. Eur Urol. 2004;46(2):264–9; discussion 269–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Salem HK. Radical cystectomy with preservation of sexual function and fertility in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: new technique. Int J Urol. 2007;14(4):294–8; discussion 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorstenson A, O’Connor RC, Ahonen R, Jonsson MN, Wijkstrom H, Akre O, Hosseini A, Wiklund NP, Henningsohn L. Clinical outcome following prostatic capsule- and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer in 25 men. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(2):127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gou X, Wang M, He WY, Liu CD, Deng YZ, Ren K, Chen Y. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer with prostatic and neurovascular sparing: initial experience. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(3):787–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dall’Oglio MF, Antunes AA, Crippa A, Nesrallah AJ, Srougi M. Long-term outcomes of radical cystectomy with preservation of prostatic capsule. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42(4):951–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Akbulut Z, Canda AE, Ozcan MF, Atmaca AF, Ozdemir AT, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical cystoprostatectomy with bilateral extended lymph node dissection and intracorporeal studer pouch construction: outcomes of first 12 cases. J Endourol. 2011;25(9):1469–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Klotz L. Prostate capsule sparing radical cystectomy: oncologic safety and clinical outcome. Ther Adv Urol. 2009;1(1):43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hautmann RE, Stein JP. Neobladder with prostatic capsule and seminal-sparing cystectomy for bladder cancer: a step in the wrong direction. Urol Clin N Am. 2005;32(2):177–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Goonewardene, S.S., Ventii, K., Bahl, A., Persad, R., Motiwala, H., Albala, D. (2021). Prostate Sparing Cystectomy: A Systematic Review. In: Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. Management of Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57915-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57915-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57914-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57915-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics