Skip to main content

The Use of Two-Dimensional (2D), Three-Dimensional (3D) Ultrasound and Fetal Doppler Studies in the First Stage of Labor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management

Abstract

Friedman’s labor partogram is the central pillar for the clinical management of labor today. First published more than a half century ago in 1955 [1], the partogram charts labor progression by the dilatation of the uterine cervix and descent of fetal presenting part over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6:567–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friedman EA. Labor: clinical evaluation and management. Appelton-Century-Crofts: New york; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:942–5. doi 0002-9378(95)90371-2 [pii].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tuffnell DJ, Bryce F, Johnson N, Lilford RJ. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet. 1989;2:1089–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lucidi RS, Blumenfeld LA, Chez RA. Cervimetry: a review of methods for measuring cervical dilatation during labor. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000;55:312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nizard J, Haberman S, Paltieli Y, Gonen R, Ohel G, Nicholson D, Ville Y. How reliable is the determination of cervical dilation? Comparison of vaginal examination with spatial position-tracking ruler. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:402. e401-404. DOI S0002-9378(09)00008-8 [pii]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sherer DM. Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19:258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sherer DM. Intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:123–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Akmal S, Tsoi E, Kametas N, Howard R, Nicolaides KH. Intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:172–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/jmf.12.3.172.177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zilianti M, Azuaga A, Calderon F, Pagés G, Mendoza G. Monitoring the effacement of the uterine cervix by transperineal sonography: a new perspective. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14(10):719–24. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1995.14.10.719.

  11. Hassan WA, Eggebo TM, Ferguson M, Lees C. Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:413–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hassan WA, Eggebo T, Ferguson M, Gillett A, Studd J, Pasupathy D, Lees CC. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:189–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hassan WA, Eggebø T, Ferguson M, et al. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(2):189–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13212.

  14. Swiatkowska-Freund M, Preis K. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:52–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.9021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Unger CA, Weinstein MM, Pretorius DH. Pelvic floor imaging. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2011;38:23–43., vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2011.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimerman AL, Smolin A, Maymon R, Weinraub Z, Herman A, Tobvin Y. Intrapartum measurement of cervical dilatation using translabial 3-dimensional ultrasonography: correlation with digital examination and interobserver and intraobserver agreement assessment. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:1289–96. DOI 28/10/1289 [pii]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vyas S, Nicolaides K, Bower S, Campbell S. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:797–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Morlando M, Hannan H, Bhide A, Papageorghiou A, Thilaganathan B. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:54.e51-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, Kumar S. Prediction of fetal compromise in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:1263–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fiolna M, Kostiv V, Anthoulakis C, Akolekar R. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by cerebroplacental ratio in women undergoing induction of labor. 2019;53:473–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20173.

  21. Krapp M, Denzel S, Katalinic A, Berg C, Germer U, Gembruch U. A preliminary study of fetal ductus venosus blood flow during the first stage of labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2002;267:19–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-001-0260-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krapp M, Kuhn A, Baumann K, Gembruch U. Reproducibility of fetal ductus venosus blood flow velocity waveforms during first stage of labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1913-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassanos D, Siristatidis C, Vitoratos N, Salamalekis E, Creatsas G. The clinical significance of Doppler findings in fetal middle cerebral artery during labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;109:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00512-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zimerman AL, Idelson A, Maymon R, Betser M. OC16.02: Intrapartum fetal cerebroplacental Doppler ratio in first and second stage of labour in uterine rest and contractions in low-risk pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52:38. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zimerman, A.L. (2021). The Use of Two-Dimensional (2D), Three-Dimensional (3D) Ultrasound and Fetal Doppler Studies in the First Stage of Labor. In: Malvasi, A. (eds) Intrapartum Ultrasonography for Labor Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57595-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57594-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57595-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics