Abstract
Distinguished schools of thought, within the increasing impact of the ‘Innovation District’ phenomenon, have highlighted the ‘Innovation Center’ idea and its interpretations as physical structures able to build a powerful nexus for social and institutional innovation in urban regeneration. These ‘intermediate places’ can be considered interactive playgrounds, triggering new horizons in urban policies toward shared, inclusionary solutions more likely to meet the needs of local communities. Social innovation is strictly path-dependent, enabled by ‘opportunity windows’ in which local actors get mutual engagement and advantage, addressing contextual needs, while creating virtuous cooperation and new governance arrangements. The thesis of the paper is that innovation centers—as ‘intermediate places’—can be successful if they are built to recover direct relationships between the various stakeholders in the urban arena; consequently, the operative capacity of practices can expand the planning strategies providing the perspective of a long-term change. Through comparisons and drawbacks arising from case studies selected from different cultural and physical geographies (City of Boston, Massachusetts, USA, and Bologna, Italy), the paper emphasizes the recognition of the variety of ‘intermediate places’, encompassing the diversity of actors, within a strategy for an authentic urban innovation ecosystem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Augé M (1992) Non-lieux, Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Seuil, La Librairie du XXe siècle, Paris
Augé M (2007) Tra i confini. Città, luoghi, interazioni. Mondadori, Milano
Baily NM, Montalbano N (2018) Clusters and innovation districts: lessons from the United States experience. The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Barbi V, Ginocchini G (2019) Cities in change: urban agencies as a strategic player to face new challenges and needs. The case of the Foundation for Urban Innovation in Bologna. In: Topi C, Lucchini C (eds) The city agencies working papers. Urban Lab Torino, Torino, pp 55–63
BEPA, Bureau of European Policy Advisors (2011) Empowering people, driving change social innovation in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
Bergvall-Kåreborn B, Eriksson CI, Ståhlbröst A (2015) Places and spaces within living labs. Technol Innov Manage Rev 5(12):37–47
Brandsen T, Cattacin S, Evers A, Zimmer A (eds) (2016) Social innovations in the urban context. Springer, Cham
Cafiero G, Calace F, Corchia I (2014) La rigenerazione urbana tra politiche economiche e innovazione istituzionale. Rivista Economica Del Mezzogiorno 3(2014):667–696
Comune di Bologna (2017) Piano per l’Innovazione Urbana di Bologna. www.comune.bologna.it/pianoinnovazioneurbana. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
Deleuze G (1994) Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press, New York
Donolo C (2003) Il distretto sostenibile. Governare i beni comuni per lo sviluppo. Franco Angeli, Milano
Donzelot J (2009) La ville à trois vitesses. Villette, Paris
Drewe P, Klein J-L, Hulsbergen E (eds) (2008). The Challenge of Social Innovation in Urban Revitalization. Techne Press, Delft
Fransman M (2018) Innovation ecosystems: increasing competitiveness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Garcia M (2006) Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities. Urban Stud 43(4):745–765
Galston WA, McElvein E (2015) Institutional innovation: how it happens and why it matters. The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
George G, Baker T, Tracey P, Joshi H (eds) (2019) Handbook of inclusive innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Gerometta J, Hausserman H, Longo G (2005) Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Stud 42(11):2007–2021
Gonzalez S, Healey P (2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urban Stud 42(11):2055–2070
Hillier J (2013) Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for social innovation research and practice. In: Moulaert F, MacCallum D, Mehmood A, Hamdouch A (eds) The international handbook of social innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 169–180
Katz B, Wagner J (2014) The rise of innovation districts: a new geography of innovation in America. The Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.
Massari M (2018) The transformative power of social innovation for new development models. In: Calabrò F, Della Spina L, Bevilacqua C (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. Smart innovation, systems and technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 354–361
Mieg HA, Topfer K (2013) Institutional and social innovation for sustainable urban development. Routledge, London
Monardo B, Trillo C (2016) Innovation strategies and cities. Insights from the Boston Area. Urbanistica 157:151–155
Monardo B (2018) Innovation districts as turbines of smart strategy policies in US and EU. Boston and Barcelona Experience. In: Calabrò F, Della Spina L, Bevilacqua C (eds) New metropolitan perspectives. Smart innovation, systems and technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 322–335
Moulaert F, MacCullum D, Mehmood A, Hamdouch A (2013) The international handbook of social innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Mulgan G (2019) Innovation districts: how cities speed up the circulation of ideas. www.nesta.org.uk/blog/innovation-districts. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
Nicolas-Le Strat P (2015) Une politique de la co-création, https://blog.le-commun.fr/?p=873. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
Nyseth T, Hamdouch A (2019) The transformative power of social innovation in urban planning and local development. Urban Planning 4(1):1–6
OECD (2001) OECD economic outlook. OECD Publishing, Paris
Ostanel E, Attili G (2018) (2018) Self-organization practices in cities: discussing the transformative potential. Tracce Urbane, Italian J Urban Stud 4:6–17
Palermo PC, Ponzini D (2015) Place-making and urban development: new challenges for contemporary planning and design. Routledge, London
Rissola G, Bevilacqua C, Monardo B, Trillo C (2019) Place-based innovation ecosystems: Boston-Cambridge innovation districts. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world. The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, www.sustainabledevelopment.org. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
Wagner J, Katz B, Osha T (2019) The evolution of innovation districts: the new geography of global innovation. GIID, https://www.giid.org. Accessed 30 Nov 2020
Williams P (2011) The life and times of the boundary spanner. J Integr Care 19(3):26–33
Yin RK (1984) Case study research and applications: design and methods, 1st ed. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills
Acknowledgements
This paper is related to the dissemination of the EU research project ‘MAPS-LED’ (Multidisciplinary Approach to Plan Specialization Strategies for Local Economic Development), Horizon 2020, Marie Sklodowska-Curie RISE, 2015-2019. The project was carried on by a European and USA university network. Bruno Monardo was the coordinator of ‘Sapienza’ University of Rome unit. This paper is also connected to the PhD research of Martina Massari in architecture of the University of Bologna—Architecture Department, with supervisor Valentina Orioli and Elena Ostanel.
Author Contributions
This paper is the result of common reflections by the two researchers. However, Bruno Monardo developed Sects. 2 and 4, Martina Massari Sects. 3 and 5, while both authors wrote Sects. 1 and 6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Monardo, B., Massari, M. (2021). Emerging Interpretation Models of Social and Institutional Innovation in the City. The Role of ‘Intermediate Places’ Between the USA and Italy. In: Bisello, A., Vettorato, D., Haarstad, H., Borsboom-van Beurden, J. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions. SSPCR 2019. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57332-4_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57332-4_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57331-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57332-4
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)