Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Implant Rupture: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Common and Uncommon Complications of Aesthetic Breast Surgery

  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

Despite advances in breast implant design and technology, rupture continues to be a significant complication and increases with time. The exact incidence of implant rupture varies by the implant model, age, and purpose (augmentation vs. reconstruction, primary vs. secondary) and may be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. One should be cautious in making direct comparisons of the data from different manufacturers. The most common cause of implant rupture is iatrogenic damage by surgical instruments. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard for diagnosing and confirming suspected ruptures. Ultrasound may be a useful adjunct under appropriate circumstances. The US Food and Drug Administration recommends MRI surveillance of implant rupture starting 3 years after implantation and recurring every 2 years afterward. Compliance with this recommendation remains poor. Saline implant rupture is easy to diagnose, as there is a noticeable decrease in volume shortly after rupture. Management includes surgical removal of the implant and capsulectomy with or without replacement. Most silicone implant ruptures are silent and intracapsular. To avoid conversion to extracapsular rupture or avoid an inflammatory stimulus that may lead to capsular contracture, elective explantation is still indicated. Extracapsular ruptures can be symptomatic and are managed by surgical removal and capsulectomy with or without replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. 2017 Plastic surgery statistics report. https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2017/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2017.pdf. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.

  2. Center for Devices and Radiological Health U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA update on the safety of silicone gel-filled breast implants. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/UCM260090.pdf. Published June 20, 2011. Accessed 18 Jan 2019.

  3. Hillard C, Fowler JD, Barta R, Cunningham B. Silicone breast implant rupture: a review. Gland Surg. 2017;6(2):163–8. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2016.09.12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Handel N, Garcia ME, Wixtrom R. Breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(5):1128–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spear SL, Murphy DK. Natrelle round silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1354–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Supplement 1):8S–16S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286580.93214.df.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Bengtson BP, Murphy DK. Ten-year results from the Natrelle 410 anatomical form-stable silicone breast implant Core study. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35(2):145–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sju084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammond DC, Canady JW, Love TR, Wixtrom RN, Caplin DA. Mentor contour profile gel implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(6):1142–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003846.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor’s MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesth Plast Surg. 2009;33(3):440–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9364-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevens WG, Calobrace MB, Alizadeh K, Zeidler KR, Harrington JL, d’Incelli RC. Ten-year core study data for Sientra’s Food and Drug Administration–approved round and shaped breast implants with cohesive silicone gel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:7S–19S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker PS, Walls B, Murphy DK. Natrelle saline-filled breast implants: a prospective 10-year study. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2008.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mentor Corporation. Saline-filled and Spectrum™ Breast Implants. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/BreastImplants/UCM232436.pdf. Published March 24, 2009. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.

  13. Nichter LS, Hardesty RA, Anigian GM. IDEAL IMPLANT structured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(1):66–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Health Canada. Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) Mentor MemoryGel silicone gel-filled breast implants. http://hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/sbd-smd/md-im/sbd_smd_2011_mentorround-69312-eng.php. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.

  15. Health Canada. Summary Basis of Decision (SBD) NATRELLE silicone-filled breast implants – smooth shell with barrier layer and NATRELLE silicone-filled breast implants – textured shell with barrier layer. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/prodpharma/sbd-smd/md-im/sbd_smd_2012_natrelleround_61865_60524-eng.php. Accessed 19 Jan 2019.

  16. Collis N, Sharpe DT. Silicone gel-filled breast implant integrity: a retrospective review of 478 consecutively explanted implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(6):1979–85; discussion1986–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadad E, Klein D, Seligman Y, Wiser I, Heller L. Sub-muscular plane for augmentation mammoplasty patients increases silicone gel implant rupture rate. Br J Plast Surg. 2019:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.11.009.

  18. Brandon H. Mechanical analysis of explanted saline-filled breast implants exposed to betadine pocket irrigation. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22(5):438–45. https://doi.org/10.1067/maj.2002.128626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Sabounchi S, De Mey AMG, Eder H. Textured saline-filled breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty: does overfilling prevent deflation? A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(1):215–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000220478.38646.9f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mason WTM, Hobby JAE. Immediate rupture of breast implant following trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(7):2432–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000061860.86524.4D.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown SL, Todd JF, Luu H-MD. Breast implant adverse events during mammography: reports to the Food and Drug Administration. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004;13(4):371–8; discussion379–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hölmich LR, Fryzek JP, Kjøller K, et al. The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54(6):583–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000164470.76432.4f.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rietjens M, Villa G, Toesca A, et al. Appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(1):13e–20e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000291.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chung KC, Malay S, Shauver MJ, Kim HM. Economic analysis of screening strategies for rupture of silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):225–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b43b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorczyca DP, Gorczyca SM, Gorczyca KL. The diagnosis of silicone breast implant rupture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Supplement 1):49S–61S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286569.45745.6a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McCarthy CM, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Silicone breast implants and magnetic resonance imaging screening for rupture: do U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations reflect an evidence-based practice approach to patient care? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):1127–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000302498.44244.52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Coroneos CJ, Selber JC, Offodile AC II, Butler CE, Clemens MW. US FDA breast implant postapproval studies. Ann Surg. 2019;269(1):30–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Medot M, Landis GH, McGregor CE, et al. Effects of capsular contracture on ultrasonic screening for silicone gel breast implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39(4):337–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Beekman WH, van Straalen WR, Hage JJ, Taets van Amerongen AH, Mulder JW. Imaging signs and radiologists’ jargon of ruptured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(4):1281–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hölmich LR, Vejborg I, Conrad C, Sletting S, McLaughlin JK. The diagnosis of breast implant rupture: MRI findings compared with findings at explantation. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53(2):213–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Moyer HR, Ghazi BH, Losken A. The effect of silicone gel bleed on capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(4):793–800. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weisman MH, Vecchione TR, Albert D, Moore LT, Mueller MR. Connective-tissue disease following breast augmentation: a preliminary test of the human adjuvant disease hypothesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(4):626–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hölmich LR, Lipworth L, McLaughlin JK, Friis S. Breast implant rupture and connective tissue disease: a review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Supplement 1):62S–9S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286664.50274.f2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Deapen D. Breast implants and breast cancer: a review of incidence, detection, mortality, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Supplement 1):70S–80S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286577.70026.5d.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brinton LA. The relationship of silicone breast implants and cancer at other sites. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(Supplement 1):94S–102S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000286573.72187.6e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank Dr. Cheryl Herman in the Department of Radiology at Washington University School of Medicine for providing radiographic examples of intracapsular and extracapsular implant ruptures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

    Austin Y. Ha, David W. Grant, Marissa M. Tenenbaum & Terence M. Myckatyn

Authors
  1. Austin Y. Ha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marissa M. Tenenbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Terence M. Myckatyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence M. Myckatyn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

    John Y.S. Kim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ha, A.Y., Grant, D.W., Tenenbaum, M.M., Myckatyn, T.M. (2021). Implant Rupture: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. In: Kim, J.Y. (eds) Managing Common and Uncommon Complications of Aesthetic Breast Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57121-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57121-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57120-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57121-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation