Skip to main content

Forest-Based Climate Change Social Interventions: Towards a Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Modeling in Forest Resources Management

Abstract

The main purpose of this chapter was to develop a framework for forest-based climate change social interventions which was fulfilled using a multi-stage process. There is no doubt that forests are important to humans, plants, animals, and the planet as a whole. In other words, the ongoing deforestation process and land degradation caused by human activities and climate changes are considered as major challenges for sustainable development around the world. Despite the improvements achieved, there are still many problems with the sustainable protection, conservation, and management of forests in different areas. This necessity has been acknowledged by the need for government interventions at all levels. In the first step of this study, the importance of forest was highlighted in terms of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In the second step, the planned/preventive forest-based climate change social intervention introduced as an effective way to reduce deforestation under climate change. In the third step, some enabling and constraining factors were proposed for successful implementation of forest-based climate change social interventions. In the fourth step, different types of the uses of forest-based climate change social interventions were critically analyzed. In the fifth stage, a typology were introduced for forest-based climate change social interventions. Finally, in light of the results of previous steps, a practical framework for forest-based social interventions under climate change was developed. In general the results of this chapter showed that in all types of forest-based climate change social interventions, the most important constraining factors include structural, political, organizational, economic, executive, collaborative, network building, and follow-up barriers. In addition, enabling factors of these interventions consist flexible designing, institutional analysis, long-term intervention, risk assessment, prioritizing local knowledge, site-specific intervention, socio-cultural forestry, non-profit incentives, social learning, and participation. The framework presented in this study can provide useful insights for forest ecosystem managers, policy-makers, decision-makers, and practitioners who are directly involved in the process of designing and implementing social interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A, Wollenberg E, Persha L (2014) Governing agriculture-forest landscapes to achieve climate change mitigation. Glob Environ Change 29:270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner RJ (2019) Sustainable development goals and the forest sector—a complex relationship. Forests 10(2):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier P, Schoene D (2009) Adapting forests and their management to climate change: an overiew. Information Service of FAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari H (2009) Sustainability of rural development projects. The eighth in a series of discussion papers produced by the Asia and the Pacific Division, IFAD

    Google Scholar 

  • Blate GM, Joyce LA, Littell JS, McNulty SG, Millar CI, Moser SC, Neilson RP, Halloran K, Peterson DL (2009) Adapting to climate change in United States national forests. Information Service of FAO

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösch M, Elsasser P, Rock J, Weimar H, Dieter M (2019) Extent and costs of forest-based climate change mitigation in Germany: accounting for substitution. Carbon Manag 10(2):127–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1560194

  • Bukoski JJ, Drazen E, Johnson WR, Swamy L (2018) Tropical forests for sustainable development: shaping the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with knowledge from the field. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2018.1418255

  • Calder I, Hofer T, Vermont S, Warren P (2008) Towards a new understanding of forests and water. UNASYLVA-FAO 229:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo J, McLennan B, Sánchez- A, Garvin T (2009) Deforestation and forest restoration in Guanacaste, Costa Rica: putting conservation policies in context. Forest Ecol Manag 258(6):931–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.10.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia EL, Somorin OA, Sonwa DJ, Tiani AM (2013) Local vulnerability, forest communities and forest-carbon conservation: case of southern Cameroon. Int J Biodiv Conserv 5(8):498–507. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC2012.0533

  • Davis EJ, Hajjar R, Charnley S, Moseley C, Wendel K, Jacobson M (2020) Community-based forestry on federal lands in the western United States: a synthesis and call for renewed research. Forest Policy Econ 111:102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexier MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263(5144):85–190.‏ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5144.185

  • Dlamini CS (2014) African forests, people and climate change project: forest and climate changes policies, strategies and programmes in the SADC and COMESA regions. In: African forest forum, working paper series, vol. 2, no. 17. African Forest Forum, Nairobi, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Duong NT, De Groot WT (2020) The impact of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) on community-level forest management in Vietnam. Forest Policy Econ 113:102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2016) Global forest resources assessment 2015. How are the world’s forests changing?, 2nd edn. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2015) Forests and climate change: working with countries to mitigate and adapt to climate change through sustainable forest management. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer DN, Christie CA (2009) Evaluation use: results from a survey of US American evaluation association members. Am J Eval 30(2):158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214008331009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajost S, Zerbock O (2013) Lessons learned from community forestry and their relevance for REDD+. United States Agency for International Development, Arlington, VA 22209

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengeveld GM, Didion M, Clerkx S, Elkin C, Nabuurs GJ, Schelhaas MJ (2015) The landscape-level effect of individual-owner adaptation to climate change in Dutch forests. Reg Environ Change 15(8):1515–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0718-5

  • Henry GT, Mark MM (2003) Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Direct Eval 97:69–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden E, Linnerud K, Banister D, Schwanitz VJ, Wierling A (2017) The imperatives of sustainable development: needs, justice, limits. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries S, Holmes T, de Andrade DFC, McGrath D, Dantas JB (2020) Searching for win-win forest outcomes: learning-by-doing, financial viability, and income growth for a community-based forest management cooperative in the Brazilian Amazon. World Dev 125:104336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jindal R, Kerr JM, Carter S (2012) Reducing poverty through carbon forestry? Impacts of the N’hambita community carbon project in Mozambique. World Dev 40(10):2123–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila P, Jong W, Colfer C (2019) Galloway. Sustainable Development Goals, Their Impacts on Forests and People

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwis C (2013) Communication for rural innovation: rethinking agricultural extension. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Madani K (2014) Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? J Environ Stud Sci 4(4):315–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mader S (2019) What drives climate change? Doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences, Institute of Sociology, University of Bern, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraseni TN, Bhattarai N, Karky BS, Cadman T, Timalsina N, Bhandari TS, San SM (2019) An assessment of governance quality for community-based forest management systems in Asia: prioritisation of governance indicators at various scales. Land Use Policy 81:750–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nhem S, Jin Lee Y, Phin S (2018) The impact of forest resource decline: analyzing forest-related income supplements to reduce income inequality and poverty of the Kouy indigenous people living in Kampong Thom province, Cambodia. J Sustain Forest 37(2):97–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1369887

  • Ofoegbu C, Chirwa PW, Francis J, Babalola FD (2017) Socio-economic factors influencing household dependence on forests and its implication for forest-based climate change interventions. South Forest J Forest Sci 79(2):109–116. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1255420

  • Patton MQ (2008) Utilization focused evaluation, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Paudel G, Adhikari S, Bhusal P (2019) Integration of forest and climate change policies in Nepal. J Forest Nat Res Manag 1(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3126/jfnrm.v1i1.22647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purnomo EP, Ramdani R, Salsabila L, Choi JW (2020) Challenges of community-based forest management with local institutional differences between South Korea and Indonesia. Dev Pract, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2020.1749561

  • Ray D, Petr M, Mullett M, Bathgate S, Marchi M, Beauchamp K (2019) A simulation-based approach to assess forest policy options under biotic and abiotic climate change impacts: a case study on Scotland's national forest estate. Forest Policy Econ 103:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.010

  • Rennaud JP, Ruitenbeek J, Tennigkeit T (2013) Challenges of community-forestry based carbon projects: process, participation, performance. Field Actions Science Reports. J Field Actions 7:21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish WR, Cook TD, Leviton LC (1991) Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiba PK, Michael GJ (2012) NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: lessons from Bangladesh. Forest Policy Econ 14(1):136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.003

  • Silva E (1994) Thinking politically about sustainable development in the tropical forests of Latin America. Dev Change 25(4):697–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1994.tb00533.x

  • Torkar G, Verlič A, Vilhar U (2014) Importance of forest ecosystem services to secondary school students: a case from the North-West Slovenia. South-East Europ Forest 5(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.15177/seefor.14-02

  • USDA (2008) Watershed forestry resource guide center for watershed protection and US forest service

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2013) Watershed forestry. USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Valizadeh N., and Bijani M. (2019). Agricultural Research: Applications and Future Orientations. In: Leal Filho W., Azul A., Brandli L., Özuyar P., Wall T. (eds) Zero Hunger. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. pp: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69626-3_5-1

  • Vanclay F (2004) Social principles for agricultural extension to assist in the promotion of natural resource management. Australian J Exper Agric 44(3):213–222. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA02139

  • Walsh ES, Vierling KT, Strand E, Bartowitz K, Hudiburg TW (2019) Climate change, woodpeckers, and forests: current trends and future modeling needs. Ecol Evol 9(4):2305–2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4876

  • World Bank (2008) Forests sourcebook: practical guidance for sustaining forests in development cooperation. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9278-7

  • Zamanipour A (2013) Agricultural extension in development process. Birjand University Press, Birjand, Iran

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naser Valizadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Valizadeh, N., Mohammadi-Mehr, S., Hayati, D. (2021). Forest-Based Climate Change Social Interventions: Towards a Theoretical Framework. In: Shit, P.K., Pourghasemi, H.R., Das, P., Bhunia, G.S. (eds) Spatial Modeling in Forest Resources Management . Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56542-8_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics