Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums

Abstract

This chapter locates referendums within a history of European democracy, understood in terms of Paul Nolte’s three Leitmotifs: search, fulfilment and crisis. The idea of the referendum is first presented as a search for something to complement representative democracy. The second part of the chapter explores how to fulfil direct democracy’s promise, a dilemma that revolves around considerations of how effectively referendums live up to their promise when used. Thirdly, and finally, the analysis looks at the history of the memory, or legacy, of referendums. Judging by the historical record, there is no apparent reason to abandon direct democracy for fear of its consequences: crises provoked by referendums can spur the democratic search for fulfilling the potential of citizen empowerment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Suche, Erfüllung and Krise, respectively.

  2. 2.

    The ruling Popular Party, which has a mono-national conception of the Spanish state, opposed the Catalan vote and succeeded in having the Constitutional Court declare the referendum unconstitutional, unlike in Scotland in 2014 where the UK government gave its consent (Cetrà and Harvey 2018).

Bibliography

  • Adler-Nissen, R. (2009). Behind the Scenes of Differentiated Integration: Circumventing National Opt-Outs in Justice and Home Affairs. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 62–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2013). The Fiscal Compact, Euro-Reforms and the Challenge for the Euro-Outs. Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook, 2013, 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørklund, T. (2009). The Surge of Referendums and the New Politics Approach. Referendums and Representative Democracy (pp. 135–154). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, V. (2016). Europe and the Sovereignty of the People. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 348–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boukala, S., & Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2016). The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek Election and Referendum Campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, S. (2015). Information Availability and Information Use in Ballot Proposition Contests: Are Voters Over-Burdened? Electoral Studies, 38, 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2014, March 15). The EU Is Not Working and We Will Change It. The Daily Telegraph. Available from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/10700644/David-Cameron-the-EU-is-not-working-and-we-will-change-it.html.

  • Cetrà, D., & Harvey, M. (2018). Explaining Accommodation and Resistance to Demands for Independence Referendums in the UK and Spain. Nations and Nationalism, Early View.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dostie, B., & Dupré, R. (2012). “The People’s Will”: Canadians and the 1898 Referendum on Alcohol Prohibition. Explorations in Economic History, 49(4), 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2011). To Call or Not to Call? Political Parties and Referendums on the EU’s Constitutional Treaty. Comparative Political Studies, 44(4), 468–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farage, N. (2012). A Referendum Stitch-up? How the EU and British Elites Are Plotting to Fix the Result. London: United Kingdom Independence Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, D., & König, T. (2009). Why Risk Popular Ratification Failure? A Comparative Analysis of the Choice of the Ratification Instrument in the 25 Member States of the EU. Constitutional Political Economy, 20(3–4), 341–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J. E., & Graver, H. P. (2018). Squaring the Circle on Brexit: Could the Norway Model Work?. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M. (1998). Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories. The Journal of Politics, 60(2), 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, J. (2010). Political Leadership in France: From Charles de Gaulle to Nicolas Sarkozy. Basingstoke: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (1996). Ireland: The Referendum as a Conservative Device? In M. Gallagher & P. V. Uleri (Eds.), The Referendum Experience in Europe (pp. 86–105). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (2004). Surpassing Realism: The Politics of European Integration Since 1945. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glencross, A. (2009). The Difficulty of Justifying European Integration as a Consequence of Depoliticization: Evidence from the 2005 French Referendum. Government and Opposition, 44(3), 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glencross, A. (2014). The Eurozone Crisis as a Challenge to Democracy and Integration in Europe. Orbis, 58(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glencross, A. (2016). Why the UK Voted for Brexit: David Cameron’s Great Miscalculation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. (2007). Taking Cues on Europe? Voter Competence and Party Endorsements in Referendums on European Integration. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J. J., & Tilley, J. (2009). A Vote Against Europe? Explaining Defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament Elections. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D., & Maher, I. (2014). British Brinkmanship and Gaelic Games: EU Treaty Ratification in the UK and Ireland from a Two Level Game Perspective. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(4), 645–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. J. (1975). Norway’s EEC Referendum: Lessons and Implications. The World Today, 31(3), 114–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hug, S., & Schulz, T. (2007). Referendums in the EU’s Constitution Building Process. The Review of International Organizations, 2(2), 177–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivaldi, G. (2018). Contesting the EU in Times of Crisis: The Front National and Politics of Euroscepticism in France. Politics, 38(3), 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2011). Ill Fares the Land: A Treatise on Our Present Discontents. London, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, L. (2002). Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 711–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government, (Ed.) Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A. (2006). How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, F., Mendez, M., & Triga, V. (2014). Referendums and the European Union: A Comparative Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, E. (2018). The Front National in the 2017 French Election: An Electoral Impasse? In B. Laffan & L. Cicchi (Eds.), 2017: Europe’s Bumper Year of Elections (pp. 241–255). San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, A. (1992). The European Rescue of the Nation State. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, E. (2012). Assessing Participation and Democracy in the EU: The Case of the European Citizens’ Initiative. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 13(3), 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, L. (2017). Types of Referendums, Provisions and Practice at the National Level Worldwide. The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy (pp. 27–59). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2017). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, P. (2012). Was ist Demokratie? Geschichte und Gegenwart. Munich: CH Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brennan, J. (2009). Ireland Says No (Again): The 12 June 2008 Referendum on the Lisbon Treaty. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(2), 258–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phinnemore, D. (2006). Beyond 25—The Changing Face of EU Enlargement: Commitment, Conditionality and the Constitutional Treaty. Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 8(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phinnemore, D. (2013). The Treaty of Lisbon: Origins and Negotiation. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (1999). AV Dicey: The Referendum as the People’s Veto. History of Political Thought, 20(3), 531–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2002). A Comparative Study of Referendums. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2015). Direct Democracy: A Comparative Study of the Theory and Practice of Government by the People. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2016). Referendums on Membership and European Integration 1972–2015. The Political Quarterly, 87(1), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvortrup, M. (2018). The History of Referendums and Direct Democracy. In L. Morel & M. Qvortrup (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook to Referendums and Direct Democracy (pp. 11–26). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, E. (2012). Qu’est-ce qu’une nation? République des Lettres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2019). Referendum Challenges to the EU’s Policy Legitimacy–And How the EU Responds. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, D. (2014). Confidence Trap. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Towards a “Reset” of EU-Swiss Relations? In M. Kaeding, J. Pollak & P. Schmidt (Eds.), The Future of Europe (pp. 117–119). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seldon, A., & Snowdon, P. (2015). Cameron at 10: The Inside Story, 2010–2015. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, A. (2018). Fight for Abortion Rights Moves to Northern Ireland. British Medical Journal‚ 8155: 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipman, T. (2016). All Out War: The Full Story of How Brexit Sank Britain’s Political Class. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. (2017). The UK’s Journey’s Into and Out of the EU: Destinations Unknown. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasson, R. F. (1998). Alcohol and Alcohol Control in Sweden. Scandinavian Studies, 70(4), 477–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J. (2000). From Sunningdale to the Good Friday Agreement: Creating Devolved Government in Northern Ireland. Contemporary British History, 14(3), 39–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trechsel, A. (2007). Direct Democracy and European Integration: A Limited Obstacle? In C. Church (Ed.), Switzerland and the European Union: A Close, Contradictory, and Misunderstood Relationship (pp. 56–71). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, R. (2015). The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J. (2017). The Netherlands: The Dutch EU Referendums on the Constitutional Treaty (2005) and the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement (2016). In Referendums on EU Matters (pp. 188–208).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, S. (2012). The Official History of Britain and the European Community, Volume II: From Rejection to Referendum, 1963–1975. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. (2013). Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissastisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research, 52, 747–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J. H. (1991). The Transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100, 2403–2483.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    Andrew Glencross

Authors
  1. Andrew Glencross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Glencross .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Julie Smith

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Glencross, A. (2021). History. In: Smith, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55803-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation