Abstract
To prepare students to face a technology-shaped world, education must become creative and innovative. In fact, we live in a fast-changing world, where technological advances have been causing a great disruption in our lives, jobs and societies; job automation and knowledge-based economies require our students to get ready for jobs that do not yet exist, for technology that has not yet been invented. This study contributes to the understanding of which learning approach is more likely to provide learners with the skills for the 21st century, to include critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration and social-emotional skills. Building on existing research on how technology impacts the way we teach and learn, it asks: which learning model optimizes student’s preparation for the knowledge-based societies? In this context, the outlined learning methods are traditional learning (learning in the physical classroom); e-learning (learning through online learning programs); and blended learning (a mix of face-to-face and e-learning). This paper is based on a review of literature on different learning approaches and respective advantages and disadvantages, both from the student’s and the teacher’s perspectives. This analysis shows that education must change, that the change includes using technology and implies challenges for students, teachers and institutions. The results indicate that to provide students with the crucial skills for an uncertain future, instead of the traditional classroom-based or the fully online learning-based model a blended or mixed approach would be preferable, as it takes advantages of the benefits of both.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed description of the MSC, consult the reference.
References
Antunes S, Almendra R (2020) Collaboration: critical roles of academia-business partnerships and challenges the workforce must face. In: Rebelo F, Soares M (eds) AHFE 2019, Advances in Ergonomics in Design: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 955. Springer, Cham, pp 370–382
Best M, MacGregor D (2015) Transitioning design and technology education from physical classrooms to virtual spaces: Implications for pre-service teacher education. Int J Technol Des Educ 27:201–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9350-z
CAE Team (2019) Why do students prefer blended learning over traditional learning? CAE website. https://www.cae.net/why-students-prefer-blended-learning-over-traditional-learning/. Accessed 21 Dec 2019
Carman JM (2005) Blended learning design: five key ingredients. ResearchGate website. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238687086_Blended_learning_design_Five_key_ingredients. Accessed 28 Dec 2019
Glenn M, D’Agostino D (ed) (2008) The future of higher education: how technology will shape learning (report). Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). New Media Consortium, New York
Grabar-Kitarović K (2019) Empowering humanity: catching up with change (interview). EC Global Rev 8:10–12
Gray A (2019) This is what matters most in education, according to the world’s best teacher. World Economic Forum website. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/why-art-really-matters-in-education-according-to-the-world-s-best-teacher/. Accessed 18 Jan 2020
Hogan R, Kedrayate A (n.d.) E-learning: a survival strategy for developing countries. In: 11th Annual Conference of the Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies (SALIES). University of the West Indies, Republic of Trinidad and Tobago
Kaplan A, Haenlein M (2016) Higher education and the digital revolution: about MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Bus Horizons 59(4):441–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2016.03.008
Laurillard D, Kennedy E (2017) The potential of MOOCs for learning at scale in the Global South. Centre for Global Higher Education, CGHE Working Paper Series, nº 31. UCL Institute of Education, London
Liimatainen H (2020) E-learning vs. blended learning—definitions, differences & use cases. Howspace website. https://www.howspace.com/resources/e-learning-vs-blended-learning. Accessed 14 Jan 2020
Liyanagunawardena TR, Adams AA, Williams SA (2013) MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. Int Rev Res Open Distance Learn. (IRRODL) 11(3):202–227
McKinsey Global Institute (2017a) A future that works: automation, employment and productivity (executive summary). McKinsey & Company
McKinsey Global Institute (2017b) Jobs lost, jobs gained: workplace transitions in a time of automation (executive summary). McKinsey & Company
McKinsey Global Institute (2017c) Technology, jobs, and the future of work (briefing note). McKinsey & Company
Microsoft, McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), Company’s Education Practice (CEP) (2018) The class of 2030 and life-ready learning: the technology imperative (summary report). https://education.minecraft.net/wp-content/uploads/13679_EDU_Thought_Leadership_Summary_revisions_5.10.18.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2020
Mindflash (2020) Asynchronous v.s. synchronous elearning. Mindflash website. https://mindflash.com/elearning-glossary/asynchronous-synchronous. Accessed 8 Jan 2020
Monson T (2017) Online vs. blended learning courses: which are right for you?. ELearning Industry website. https://elearningindustry.com/online-vs-blended-learning-courses-which-right-you. Accessed 3 Jan 2020
Newbold C (2018) Not your mother’s online class. Inside Higher Ed. website. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/views/2018/08/22/hybrid-education-breath-future-and-death-teaching-we-know-it. Accessed 9 Jan 2020
OECD (2018) The future of education and skills: education 2030. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
Olsson U (2020) The grounds for higher education teachers to engage in MOOC development projects. Eur J Open Distance E-Learn 22(2):145–156
Parker K, Lenhart A, Moore K (2011) The digital revolution and higher education: college presidents, public differ on value of online learning (report). Pew Research Center, Washington D.C.
Pfeffermann G (2013) Technology, education and the developing world. Bized magazine website. https://bized.aacsb.edu/articles/2013/07/technology-education-and-the-developing-world. Accessed 11 Jan 2020 (2013)
Ramos K (2016) Education of the future and the hybrid learning spaces. Eur. J. Open Distance e-Learn. 19(2)
Scott CL (2015) The future of learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? ERF Working Papers Series, nº 15. UNESCO: Education and Foresight, Paris (2015)
Tayebinik M, Puteh M (2013) Blended learning or e-learning? Int Mag Adv Comput Sci Telecommun (IMACST) 3(1):103–110
Titthasiri W (2013) A comparison of e-learning and traditional learning: experimental approach. IISRC - Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci (IJITCS) 12(3):67–74
UNESCO (2016) The world needs almost 69 million new teachers to reach the 2030 education goals. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS), UIS Fact Sheet, nº 39. UNESCO UIS website. http://uis.unesco.org/en/document/world-needs-almost-69-million-new-teachers-reach-2030-education-goals. Accessed 25 Jan 2020
University at Buffalo (n.d.) Trends of online learning in higher education: how online learning will shape higher education (white paper). Center for Educational Innovation, EUA
University of Oxford (2015) International trends in higher education. University of Oxford International Strategy Office (2015)
World Economic Forum (2016) New vision for education: fostering social and emotional learning through technology (report). World Economic Forum, Geneva
Zogg P (2017) Prodiags view point of e-learning vs. traditional learning. Prodiags website. https://prodiags.com/prodiags/prodiags-view-point-e-learning-vs-traditional-learning/. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Acknowledgements
1. CIAUD – Research Centre for Architecture, Urbanism and Design, Lisbon School of Architecture, University of Lisbon, Portugal; 2. FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology, Portugal.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Antunes, S. (2021). Education in a Technology-Shaped World: Which Learning Model Helps Preparing for the Knowledge-Based Societies?. In: Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, J., Correia Castilho, L., Dias, R. (eds) Advances in Design, Music and Arts. EIMAD 2020. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55700-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55700-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55699-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55700-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)