Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Impact-Centred Tool for Developing Design Students’ Capacity for Sustainable Transformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design, Music and Arts (EIMAD 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 9))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 781 Accesses

Abstract

At their course’s final years, both undergraduate and postgraduate design students are often presented with a pool of topics that they can select from to work on their major/final project. Some students struggle first with making this choice, and then, after the work is submitted, marked and the degree is completed, they have to deal with the frustration of leaving such projects behind and totally inconsequential. This may happen because the student is not oriented towards reflecting on how each of the possible topics to choose from can become a more or less impactful project 1) during the remainder of their studies, 2) for their professional development and future employability, and 3) in terms of supporting/helping a wider community, by solving a problem common to many.

After analysing 35 generative boards/canvases retrieved from a diversity of professional sources, a taxonomy for the design of this kind of visual tools was optimised and a visual board—the Impact Plan—is proposed. It aims at obviating the lack of reflection on the moment of choosing a project, providing students with a matching process between their interpretation of the available or most interesting projects from said pool, and their motivations, capacities, ambitions, levels of altruism and perception of value. A low-fidelity prototype was designed and tested with academics and careers/placements officers. The tool triggered immediate interest, for which reason it is currently being implemented as alternative assessment (due to the recent COVID-19 disruptions) in a postgraduate academic context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrows HS (1996) Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: a brief overview. In: Wilkerson L, Gijselaers WH (eds) Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: theory and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger D, Wild C (2017) Enhancing student performance and employability through the use of authentic assessment techniques in extra and co-curricular activities (ECCAs). Law Teach 51(4):428–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2016.1201745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell AF, Engelhardt Y (2002) A meta-taxonomy for diagram research. In: Anderson M, Meyer B, Olivier P (eds) Diagrammatic representation and reasoning. Springer, London, pp 47–64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Choi I, Lee K (2008) A case-based learning environment design for real-world classroom management problem solving. TechTrends 52(3):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corple D, Torres DH, Zoltowski CB, Miller KE, Feister MK, Buzzanell PM (2018). Understanding ethical reasoning in design through the lens of reflexive principlism. Presented at 2018 ASEE annual conference & exposition, american society for engineering education, 24–27 June 2018, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe A (2002) Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Manag Learn 33(1):35–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curedale R (2013) Design thinking: process and methods manual. Design Community College, Topanga

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K (2011) The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application. Des Stud 32(6):521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth AL, Matthews MD, Kelly DR, Peterson C (2007) Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(6):1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ERiC (2010) Evaluating the societal relevance of academic research: a guide. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijselaers WH (1996) Connecting problem-based practices with educational theory. In: Wilkerson L, Gijselaers WH (eds) Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: theory and practice. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Girling R (2020) What’s next for design: towards humanity-centered design. https://www.artefactgroup.com/ideas/towards-humanity-centered-design/. Accessed 24 Mar 2020

  • Gough I (1998) What are human needs? In: Franklin J (ed) Social policy and social justice: the IPPR reader. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelis C (2020) Optimised taxonomy for the analysis and design of canvas-based tools. In: DIGICOM, 4th international conference on digital design and communication, 5–7 November 2020, Barcelos, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson D (2016) Re-conceptualising graduate employability: the importance of pre-professional identity. High Educ Res Dev 35(5):925–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1139551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieslinger B, Pata K, Fabian CM (2009) A participatory design approach for the support of collaborative learning and knowledge building in networked organizations. Int J Adv Corp Learn 2:34–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsbein T, Mueller RL (2019) Data thinking: a canvas for data-driven ideation workshops. In: Proceedings of the 52nd hawaii international conference on system sciences 2019, 8–11 January 2019, Grand Wailea, Maui

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman J (2018) Postgraduate taught experience survey 2018. Advance HE

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley J, Machin SJ (2016) The rising postgraduate wage premium. Economica 83(330):281–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark LW, Nickerson JA, Derrick D (2017) Wicked problem formulation: models of cognition in the design and selection of valuable strategies. Acad Manag Proc 1:17551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1943) A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev 50:370–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson D, Erlandsson L-K, Eklund M, Iwarsson S (2001) Value dimensions, meaning, and complexity in human occupation—a tentative structure for analysis. Scand J Occup Ther 8:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • QAA (2009) Personal development planning: guidance for institutional policy and practice in higher education. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaas/enhancement-and-development/pdp-guidance-for-institutional-policy-and-practice.pdf?sfvrsn=4145f581_8. Accessed 04 Nov 2019

  • Rennie DL (1992) Qualitative analysis of the client’s experience of psychotherapy: the unfolding of reflexivity. In: Toukmanian SG, Rennie DL (eds) Psychotherapy process research: paradigmatic and narrative approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 211–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CR (1983) Freedom to learn for the 80’s. Merrill, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Savickas ML (2016) Reflection and reflexivity during life-design interventions: comments on career construction counseling. J Vocat Behav 97:84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (2006) Basic human values: theory, measurement, and applications. Rev Française Sociol 47(4):929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinek S, Mead D, Docker P (2017) Find your why: a practical guide for discovering purpose for you and your team. Portfolio Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spacey J (2018) 26 types of design fiction, simplicable. https://simplicable.com/new/design-fiction. Accessed 15 Mar 2020

  • Tharp BM, Tharp SM (2018) Discursive design: critical, speculative and alternative things. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoring K, Mueller RM, Badke-Schaub P (2019) Exploring the design space of innovation canvases. In: Proceedings of the academy for design innovation management conference, 19–21 June 2019, London, pp 593–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward R, Watts AG (2009) Personal development planning and employability, in personal development planning and employability. Learning and Employability Series. Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/pdp_and_employability_jan_2009.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2020

  • Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick M, Fletcher JA (2011) Levels of altruism. Biol Theory 9:100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of West London, London, UK

    Catarina Lelis

Authors
  1. Catarina Lelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catarina Lelis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas do, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    Daniel Raposo

  2. Instituto Politécnico de Castelo, Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas do, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    João Neves

  3. Instituto Politécnico de Castelo, Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas do, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    José Silva

  4. Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas do, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    Luísa Correia Castilho

  5. Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco, Escola Superior de Artes Aplicadas do, Castelo Branco, Portugal

    Rui Dias

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lelis, C. (2021). An Impact-Centred Tool for Developing Design Students’ Capacity for Sustainable Transformation. In: Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, J., Correia Castilho, L., Dias, R. (eds) Advances in Design, Music and Arts. EIMAD 2020. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55700-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55700-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55699-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55700-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation