Skip to main content

Estimated Influence of Online Management Tools on Team Management Based on the Research with the Use of the System of Organizational Terms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1251))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 909 Accesses

Abstract

The paper aims at presenting results of the research which allows estimating a level of this influence and which concerns team management. The research problem in the paper concerns a possibility of replacing human managers with robots in the field of team management. If the managerial actions should be recorded by the management tools in order to launch machine learning of robots, there comes a research question: to what extent does a managerial tool influence the team management launched by a manager? The research problem entails a hypothesis: (H1) the use of the online management tools creates much less primal organizational terms than all actions taken in human-computer interaction and (H2) the use of the online management tools changes an order of managerial actions in team management. The paper contains theoretical foundations of human-computer interaction research (Sect. 2), theoretical foundations of the system of organizational terms (Sect. 3), research results (Sect. 4) and conclusions (Sect. 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E.: Human work in the robotic future: policy for the age of automation. Foreign Aff. 95(4), 139–150 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davern, M.J.: Towards a unified theory of fit: task, technology and individual action. In: Hart, D., Gregor, S. (eds.) Information Systems Foundations, pp. 49–70. Australian National University E-Press, Australia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sinar, E., Paese, M.: The new leader profile. Train. Mag. 53(3), 46–50 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flak, O.: System of organizational terms as a methodological concept in replacing human managers with robots. In: Advances in Information and Communication. Proceedings of the 2019 Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC), pp. 471–500. Springer, San Francisco (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bush, V.: As we may think. Atlantic Monthly 176, 101–108 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A.: The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flak, O., Hoffmann-Burdzińska, K.: Managerial tools’ influence on a planning process. Results of the experiment. In: Nalepka, A., Ujwary, A. (eds.) Business and Non-profit Organizations Fading Increased Competition and Growing Customers’ Demands, pp. 119–139. Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. MacKenzie, I.S.: Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borman, L.: SICGHI: the early years. SIGCHI Bulletin, 4–6 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 318–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35, 982–1003 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahuja, J., Webster, J.: Perceived disorientation: an examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interact. Comput. 14, 5–29 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Earnshaw, R.A.: Virtual Reality Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Newell, A.: Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., Purcell, T.: Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: important vehicles for a design process. Des. Stud. 21(6), 539–567 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grabska, E., Slusarczyk, G., Gajek, S.: Knowledge representation for human-computer interaction in a system supporting conceptual design. Fundamenta Informaticae 124, 91–110 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanau, P.R., Lenorovitz, D.R.: Prototyping and simulation tools for user/computer dialogue design. Comput. Graph. 14(3), 271–278 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coyne, R.D., Rosenman, M.A., Radeford, A.D., Balachandran, M., Gero, J.S.: Knowledge Based Design Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brey, P.: The epistemology and ontology of human-computer interaction. Mind. Mach. 15, 383–398 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacob, R.J.K.: Using formal specifications in the design of a human-computer interface. Commun. ACM 2(4), 259–264 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Conway, M.E.: Design of a separable transition-diagram compiler. Commun. ACM 7, 396–408 (1963)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Dijkstra, E.W.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Embley, D.W.: Empirical and formal language design applied to a unified control construct for interactive computing. Int. I. Man Mach. Stud. 10(2), 197–218 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hansen, W.J.: User engineering principles for interactive systems. In: AFIPS 1971 (Fall) Proceedings, New York, pp. 523–532 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Salvucci, D.D., Neils, A.T.: The Multitasking Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human–Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Addison Wesley, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things. First Basic Paperback, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, G.J.: Human-Computer Interaction Fundamentals and Practic. CRC Press, London (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim, S., Mankoff, J., Paulos, E.: Exploring barriers to the adoption of mobile technologies for volunteer data collection campaigns. In: Proceedings of CHI 2015, pp. 3117–3126 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lopez-Basterretxea, A., Mendez-Zorrilla, A., Garcia-Zapirain, B.: Eye/head tracking technology to improve HCI with iPad applications. Sensors 15, 2244–2264 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, W.O., Kim, Y.G., Hong, H.G., Park, K.R.: Face recognition system for set-top box-based intelligent TV. Sensors 14, 21726–21749 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frutos-Pascual, M., Garcia-Zapirain, B.: Assessing visual attention using eye tracking sensors in intelligent cognitive therapies based on serious games. Sensors 15, 11092–11117 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alonso-Martín, F., Castro-González, A., Luengo, F., Salichs, M.: Augmented robotics dialog system for enhancing human-robot interaction. Sensors 15, 15799–15829 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shoaib, M., Bosch, S., Incel, O.D., Scholten, H., Havinga, P.J.M.: A survey of online activity recognition using mobile phones. Sensors 15, 2059–2085 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Diaper, D.: Understanding task analysis for human–computer interaction. In: Diaper, D., Stanton, N.A. (eds.) The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 5–48. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paternò, F.: ConcurTaskTrees: an engineered notation for task models. In: Diaper, D., Stanton, N.A. (eds.) The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 483–502. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sutcliffe, A.G.: User-Centered Requirements Engineering, Theory & Practice. Springer, New York (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Flak, O.: Concept of managerial tools based on the system of organizational terms. In: Knosala, R. (ed.) Innovation in Management and Production Engineering, pp. 187–197. Oficyna Wydawnicza Polskiego Towarzystwa Zarządzania Produkcją, Opole (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Flak, O.: Konceptualizacja układu wielkości organizacyjnych. In: Nalepka, A. (ed.) Organizacje komercyjne i niekomercyjne wobec wzmożonej konkurencji oraz wzrastających wymagań konsumentów, pp. 13–22. Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Flak, O.: Theoretical foundation for managers’ behavior analysis by graph-based pattern matching. Int. J. Contemp. Manag. 12(4), 110–123 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Flak, O.: Układ wielkości organizacyjnych jako obiekt badań. In: Nalepka, A. (ed.) Organizacje komercyjne i niekomercyjne wobec wzmożonej konkurencji oraz wzrastających wymagań konsumentów, pp. 64–74. Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu, Nowy Sącz (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zalabardo, J.: Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Rios, D.: Models and modeling in the social sciences. Perspect. Sci. 21(2), 221–225 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Backlund, A.: The definition of system. Kybernetesc 29(4), 444–451 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Gryganiec, M.: Trwanie w czasie. In: Kołodziejczyk, S.T. (ed.) Przewodnik po metafizyce, pp. 211–276. Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brink, C., Rewitzky, I.: Three dual ontologies. J. Philos. Logic 31(6), 543–568 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Barney, J.B.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brajer-Marczak, R.: Elements of knowledge management in the improvement of business processes. Management 20(2), 242–260 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Flak, O., Yang, C., Grzegorzek, M.: Action sequence matching of team managers. In: Marsico, M., Baja, S.G., Fred, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods ICPRAM, pp. 386–393 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Flak, O.: Methodological foundations of online management tools as research tools. In: Benson, V., Filippaios, F. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, ECRM 2017, 22–23 June 2017, pp. 113–121. Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Midgley, G.: Science as systemic intervention: some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 16(2), 77–97 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mari, L.: The problem of foundations of measurement. Measurement 38(4), 259–266 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Chopraa, P.K., Gopal, K.K.: On the science of management with measurement. Total Qual. Manag. 22(1), 63–81 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Curtis, B., Kellner, M., Over, J.: Process modeling. Commun. ACM 35(9), 75–90 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Flak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Flak, O. (2021). Estimated Influence of Online Management Tools on Team Management Based on the Research with the Use of the System of Organizational Terms. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55187-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics