Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CEFR, CLIL, LOA, and TBLT – Synergising Goals, Methods and Assessment to Optimise Active Student Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessment and Learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms

  • 1285 Accesses

Abstract

Internationalisation has brought a diversity of language teaching approaches to Japan, where they have been adopted or adapted to varying degrees across a wide range of contexts, from elementary to tertiary education. Among those approaches, CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages), CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning), TBLT (Task-based Language Teaching), and LOA (learning-oriented assessment) have been chosen as the cornerstones of a curriculum model currently under development at a College of International Relations at a large-scale private university in western Japan that provides both Japanese and English-medium instruction. The rationale for choosing this set of principles and practices is that it is transparent, scalable, coherent and practical. Referring to the above named principles, the chapter will address the following questions from a theoretical and practical perspective: how and why to create a localised framework for CLIL, how to increase articulation across and within programs, how to link curricular goals, methodology, and assessment, how to support the teaching faculty in the implementation of the new framework and how to ensure that students can become active learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Bygate, M. (Ed.). (2015). Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byram, M., & Parmenter, L. (2012). The common European framework of reference: The globalisation of language education policy. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chan, C., & Glofcheski, R. (Eds.). (2017). Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education. Singapore: Springer Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcke, J., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2017). Integrating content and language in higher education: Perspectives on professional practice. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • AJE & JF. (2005). Learning and teaching Japanese language in Europe and the common European framework of reference for languages. Tokyo: Japan Foundation. http://www.jpf.go.jp/j/publish/japanese/euro/. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, J. C., Haapakangas, E.-L., Huhta, A., Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. (2014). The diagnosis of reading in a second or foreign language. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2015). Towards a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights from professional practice across diverse fields. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definite source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 344–351). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, G. C. (2012). Task-based language teaching in a low-proficiency Japanese university context. Hachinohe University Journal, 45, 41–50. http://jairo.nii.ac.jp/0305/00000118/en. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P. (2009). Does CLIL work? In D. Hill & P. Alan (Eds.), The best of both worlds?: International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 32–43). Norwich: Norwich Institute for Language Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevides, M. (2016, June). Widgets: A TBLT textbook postmortem. Plenary paper presented at the third TBLT in Asia conference, Kyoto: Ryukoku University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benevides, M., & Valvona, C. (2008). Widgets: A task-based course in practical English. Hong Kong: Pearson Education Asia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berceruelo, M. T. (2018, July). Piloting CEFR companion volume descriptors. Paper presented at the launching conference for the CEFR companion volume with new descriptors, Strasbourg, pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. J., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2010). Classroom assessment in the Hong Kong policy context. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 438–442). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou, D. (2017). The future of assessment for learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (2013). Snapshot of a lower secondary CLIL program in Japan. Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, T. (2014). Designing supplementary CLIL materials for a MEXT-authorised English textbook in Japan.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262643160. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Council of Europe. (2001a). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Modern Languages Division/Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2001b). European Language Portfolio (ELP). www.coe.int/portfolio. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Companion volume with new descriptors. Provisional edition. Language Policy Programme. Education Policy Division. Education Department. Council of Europe. www.coe.int/lang-cefr. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.

  • Council of Europe. (n.d.). Use of the CEFR. https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/uses-and-objectives. Accessed 19 Mar 2019.

  • Coyle, D. (2018). Designing ‘successful’ principles and practices for deep learning in CLIL contexts. https://www.ehb.swiss/bili-tagungconference-bili-documentation. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00242.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, J. (2017, February 2). EMI (and CLIL) – A growing global trend.https://oupeltglobalblog.com/2017/02/02/emi-and-clil-a-growing-global-trend/. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2002). Resolution on improving and diversifying language learning and teaching within the education systems of the European Union. Barcelona: EUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuta, J. (2016). Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaboniat, M., Müller, M., Rusch, P., Schmitz, H., & Wertenschlag, L. (2003). Profile Deutsch: Lernzielbestimmungen, Kannbeschreibungen, kommunikative Mittel, Niveau A1, A2, B1, B2 [CD-ROM mit Begleitbuch]. Berlin: Langenscheidt.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Lloret, M., & Nielson, K. B. (2014). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2018). Responding to the critics: Implementation of TBLT in Japan. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., & Leeming, P. I. (2018a). OnTask 3, English language teaching textbook upper intermediate level. Tokyo: Abax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., & Leeming, P. I. (2018b). OnTask 2, English language teaching textbook lower intermediate level. Tokyo: Abax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J., & Leeming, P. I. (2018c). OnTask 1, English language teaching textbook beginner level. Tokyo: Abax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatasa, Y., & Watanabe, T. (2017). Japanese as a second language assessment in Japan: Current issues and future directions. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(3), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1351565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horiba, Y., & Fukaya, K. (2012). Effects of task instructions on text processing and learning in a Japanese college nursing setting. In C. A. Coombe & A. Shehadeh (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 89–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda, M. (2013). Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? International CLIL Research Journal, 2(1), 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, O. (2008). Language assessment culture. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 2418–2432). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M. (2016, July 3). CLIL teacher education: A case at a Japanese university. Paper delivered at the CLIL special symposium, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. O. (2012). Task-based language teacher education in an undergraduate program in Japan. In C. A. Coombe & A. Shehadeh (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 267–285). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Foundation. (2010). JF standard for Japanese language education (2nd ed.). Tokyo: Japan Foundation. https://jfstandard.jp/pdf/jfs2010_all_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, P. (2016, June 8). Is the Eiken doing Japan’s English learners more harm than good? The Japan Times.https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2016/06/08/issues/eiken-japans-english-learners-harm-good/#.W1902bo4DIU. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Kashiwagi, K., & Tomecsek, J. (2015). How CLIL classes exert a positive influence on teaching style in student centered language learning through overseas teacher training in Sweden and Finland. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusumoto, Y. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking through active learning. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, R. (2017). Taking stock of portfolio scholarship: From research to practice. Assessing Writing, 31, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeming, P. (2017). Investigating collective-efficacy in the foreign language classroom. The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1416424.

  • Leong, W. S., & Tan, K. (2014). What (more) can, and should, assessment do for learning? Observations from ‘successful learning context’ in Singapore. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 593–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, C., & Morton, T. (2016). Conclusion: Language competence, learning and pedagogy in CLIL – Deepening and broadening integration. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 235–248). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE–The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential public services contract DG EAC: European Commission, 1–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrostie, J. (2017, July 5). Spoken English tests among entrance exam reforms Japan’s students will face in 2020. The Japan Times.https://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2017/07/05/issues/spoken-english-tests-among-entrance-exam-reforms-japans-students-will-face-2020/#.W19xbbo4DIU. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • McLellan, P. (2018). Scaffolding excellence: Content-language integration and the development of ‘global leaders’. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7(3), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehisto, P., & Lucietto, S. (2011). CLIL essentials. https://www.icfabriani.edu.it/allegati/443/WHAT%20IS%20%20CLIL%20BY%20PROF.SSA%20SANDRA%20LUCIETTO.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Mehisto, P., & Ting, T. Y. L. (2017). CLIL essentials for secondary school teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEXT. (2009). The global 30 project. Ministry of Education, Japan.http://www.mext.go.jp/en/policy/education/highered/title02/detail02/sdetail02/1373894.htm. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • MEXT. (2014). Top global universities. Ministry of Education, Japan.https://tgu.mext.go.jp/en/about/index.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lucas, J. F. (2003). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design (Research Report 03–16). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • MLA. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world.https://www.mla.org/Resources/Research/Surveys-Reports-and-Other-Documents/Teaching-Enrollments-and-Programs/Foreign-Languages-and-Higher-Education-New-Structures-for-a-Changed-World. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Negishi, M., & Tono, Y. (2014, April 10–11). An update on the CEFR-J project and its impact on English language teaching in Japan. Paper delivered at 2014 ALTE Paris, http://events.cambridgeenglish.org/alte-2014/docs/presentations/alte2014-masashi-negishi.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2019.

  • Negishi, M., Takada, T., & Tono, Y. (2012). A progress report on the development of the CEFR-J. Studies in Language Testing, 36, 137–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. C. L. (2017). English-medium instruction in Japanese universities: Policy implementation and constraints. Current Issues in Language Planning, 18(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1204053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M. (2016). Language program evaluation. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, B. (2007). The CEFR levels: Key points and key problems. Paper presented at the symposium of the Association of Language Testers in Europe (ALTE): The common European framework of reference for languages: From plurilingualism to intercultural competences, April 18–20 at Sevres. http://www.ealta.eu.org/documents/resources/B%20North%20Presentation%20Sevres%202007.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2019.

  • O’Dwyer, F., & deBoer, M. (2015). Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies. Language Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, F., Imig, A., & Nagai, N. (2013). Connectedness through a strong form of TBLT, classroom implementation of the CEFR, cyclical learning and learning-oriented assessment. Language Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2013-0012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, F., Hunke, M., Imig, A., Nagai, N., Naganuma, N., & Schmidt, M. G. (Eds.). (2017). Critical, constructive assessment of CEFR-informed language teaching in Japan and beyond (English profile series 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning.http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

  • Pavon, V., & Ellison, M. (2013). Examining teacher roles and competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Linguarum Arena, 4, 65–78. http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/12007.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runnels, J. (2014). The CEFR-J: The story so far (2012–2014). FLP SIG Newsletter, 12, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runnels, J. (2015). Usage of the CEFR and CEFR-J in Japanese universities: Preliminary survey results. FLP SIG Newsletter, 14, 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, H. (2008). EFL classroom peer assessment: Training effects on rating and commenting. Language Testing, 25(4), 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208094276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasajima, S. (2013). How CLIL can impact on EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching and learning: An exploratory study on teacher cognition. International CLIL Research Journal, 2, 1. http://www.icrj.eu/21/article5.html. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki, M. (2018). Application of diffusion of innovation theory to educational accountability: The case of EFL education in Japan. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0052-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasayama, S., & Izumi, S. (2012). Effects of task complexity and pre-task planning on Japanese EFL learners’ oral production. In C. A. Coombe & A. Shehadeh (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 23–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, R. (2010). Reconsidering the effectiveness and suitability of PPP and TBLT in the Japanese EFL classroom. JALT Journal, 32(2), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M., Naganuma, N., O’Dwyer, F., Imig, A., & Sakai, K. (Eds.). (2011). Can-do statements in language education in Japan and beyond. Tokyo: Asahi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigemori Bučar, C., Ryu, H., Moritoki Škof, N., & Hmeljak Sangawa, K. (2014). The CEFR and teaching Japanese as a foreign language. Linguistica, 54, 455–469. https://doi.org/10.4312/linguistica.54.1.455-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimojima, Y., & Arimoto, M. (2017). Assessment for learning practices in Japan: Three steps forward, two steps back. Assessment Matters, 11. https://doi.org/10.18296/am.0023.

  • Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (2012). A critical perspective on the use of English as a medium of instruction at universities. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges (pp. 196–2012). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback and promote student learning. Sterling: Stylus Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sybing, R. (2011). A response to criticism of TBLT in Japan’s language classrooms. JALT Journal, 33(1), 67–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tono, Y. (2017). CEFR-J Version 1.0 (English). Retrieved from https://tufspods.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/cefr-j-english-version.pdf

  • Tono, Y. (2019). Coming full circle – From CEFR to CEFR-J and back. CEFR Journal – Research and Practice, 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. J. (2010). Peers as a source of formative feedback. In H. L. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 61–74). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trim, J. L. M. (Ed.). (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. User guide. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680697848. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya, K., & Murillo, M. D. P. (2015). Comparing the language policies and the students’ perceptions of CLIL in tertiary education in Spain and Japan. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 8(1), 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In D. Tsagari & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 255–274). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-018.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2014.960046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y., Ikeda, M., & Izumi, S. (Eds.). (2011). CLIL: New challenges in foreign language education (Vol. 1). Tokyo: Sophia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y., Ikeda, M., & Izumi, S. (Eds.). (2012). CLIL: New challenges in foreign language education (Vol. 2). Tokyo: Sophia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Y., Ikeda, M., & Izumi, S. (Eds.). (2016). CLIL: New challenges in foreign language education (Vol. 3). Tokyo: Sophia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C. (2012). Incorporating a formative assessment cycle into task-based language teaching in a university setting in Japan. In C. A. Coombe & A. Shehadeh (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp. 287–312). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wicking, P. (2017). The assessment beliefs and practices of English teachers in Japanese universities. JLTA, 20, 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamano, Y. (2013). Utilizing the CLIL approach in a Japanese primary school: A comparative study of CLIL and EFL lessons. Asian EFL Journal, 15(4), 160–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W. (2017). Tuning university graduates for high mobility and employability under the content and language integrated learning approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(6), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1061474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda, S. (2017). Toward a framework for linking linguistic knowledge and writing expertise: Interplay between SFL-based genre pedagogy and task-based language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 576–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of International Relations, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, Japan

    Claudia Kunschak

Authors
  1. Claudia Kunschak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Kunschak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. English for Academic Purposes, Akita International University, Akita, Japan

    Mark deBoer

  2. Department of Language and Communication Studies, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Dmitri Leontjev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kunschak, C. (2020). CEFR, CLIL, LOA, and TBLT – Synergising Goals, Methods and Assessment to Optimise Active Student Learning. In: deBoer, M., Leontjev, D. (eds) Assessment and Learning in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54128-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54128-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54127-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54128-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation