Abstract
The author first distinguishes between evaluative and normative (or ought-)statements. While—not without some qualifications—evaluative statements can be logically derived from is-statements containing evaluative predicates, “parallel” ought-from-is derivations (OFIDs) raise problems. To address these problems, the author distinguishes between OFIDs involving (α) terms like “slave” or “chess rook” and “OFIDs” involving (β) terms like “promise” or “derive.” α-terms serve to express or describe normative emotions, attitudes, and/or hypostatizations; β-terms serve to create them (in a socio-psychological sense). While with α-terms OFIDs are possible, β-terms can be used only to make socio-psychological hypotheses. Next, the author shows that Searle’s counts-as formula selects phenomena unrelated to Searle’s examples of constitutive rules. Finally, the author shows that—pace Searle—language alone does not make OFIDs possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albert, H. (1975) 1985. Traktat über kritische Vernunft. English translation Treatise on Critical Reason. 3rd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
———. 1991. Traktat über kritische Vernunft. 5th ed. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
———. 1995. “Intellektueller Humanismus. Theodor Geiger als Ideologiekritiker und als Vertreter der Aufklärung.” In Theodor Geiger in einer Zeit “zwischen Pathos und Nüchternheit”. Beiträge zu Leben und Werk, edited by S. Bachmann. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
Backhouse, A. E. 2003. “Connotation.” In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 4, 2nd ed., edited by W. Frawley, 9–10. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baggini, Julian. 2002. “Morality as a Rational Requirement.” Philosophy 77 (301): 447–453.
Conte, A. G. 1997. “Eidetic-Constitutive Rules.” In Law and Language: The Italian Analytical School, edited by A. Pintore and M. Jori. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.
Fittipaldi, E. 2012. Everyday Legal Ontology: A Psychological and Linguistic Investigation Within the Frame of Leon Petrażycki’s Theory of Law. Milan: LED.
———. 2016. “Introduction: Continental Legal Realism.” In Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World, Tome 2: Main Orientations and Topics, edited by E. Pattaro and C. Roversi. Springer: Dordrecht.
———. 2019. “Hans Albert’s Critical Rationalism Radicalized: The Perspective of Sociologist of Law.” In Begegnugen mit Hans Albert: Eine Hommage, edited by G. Franco, 109–115. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Galtung, J. 1959. “Expectations and Interaction Processes.” An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 2 (1–4), 213–234.
Gardies, J.-L. 1987. L’erreur de Hume. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Geiger, T. (1947) 1964. Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied am Rhein: Luchterhand.
Grossi, D., and A. J. I. Jones. 2013. “Constitutive Norms and Counts-as Conditionals.” In Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, edited by D. Gabbay, J. Horty, X. Parent, R. van der Meyden, and L. van der Torre, 49–95. Milton Keynes: Lightning Source.
———, J. C. Meyer, and F. Dignum. 2006. “Counts-as: Classification or Constitution? An Answer Using Modal Logic.” In Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems, edited by L. Goble and J. J. C. Meyer, 115–130. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
Hage, J. 2013. “Juridical Acts and the Gap between Is and Ought.” Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 42 (1), 50–66.
Hornby, P. A. 1972. “The Psychological Subject and Predicate.” Cognitive Psychology 3: 632–642.
James, L. 2010. “Byzantium: A Very, Very Short Introduction.” In A Companion to Byzantium, edited by L. James. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kelsen, H. 1979. Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Vienna: Manz.
Klein, G. 1986. La politica linguistica del fascismo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Luban, D. J., J. R. O’Sullivan, D. P. Stewart, and N. Jain. 2019. International and Transnational Criminal Law. New York, NY: Wolters Kluwer.
Luhmann, N. 1969. “Normen in soziologischer Perspektive.” Soziale Welt 20 (1): 28–48.
———. (1972) 1985. Rechtssoziologie. English translation A Sociological Theory of Law. London, etc.: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Olivecrona, K. 1971. Law as Fact. 2nd ed. London: Stevens & Sons.
Pattaro, E. 2016. “Axel Hägerström at the Origins of the Uppsala School.” In Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World, Tome 2: Main Orientations and Topics, edited by E. Pattaro and C. Roversi, 1383–1427. Dordrecht: Springer.
Petrażycki, L. (1925–1926) 1939. Nowe podstawy logiki i klasyfikacja umiejętności. Warsaw: Nakładem Towarzystwa im. Leona Petrażyckiego.
Piazza, G. 2004. “Osservazioni sul concetto di dovere in Searle.” Fenomenologia e Società 27 (2): 42–59.
Podgórecki, Adam. 1980. “Unrecognized Father of Sociology of Law: Leon Petrazycki.” Law and Society Review 15: 183–202.
Popper, K. R. (1945) 2002. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London and New York: Routledge.
Schurz, G. 1997. The Is-Ought Problem: An Investigation in Philosophical Logic. Dordrecht: Springer.
Searle, J. R. 1964. “How to Derive ‘Ought’ From ‘Is.’” The Philosophical Review 73 (1): 43–58.
———. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, B. 2003. “John Searle: From Speech Acts to Social Reality.” In John Searle. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus, edited by B. Smith, 1–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———, and J. R. Searle. 2003. “The Construction of Social Reality: An Exchange.” In American Journal of Economics and Sociology 62 (2): 285–309.
Spaak, T. 2014. A Critical Appraisal of Karl Olivecrona's Legal Philosophy. Cham, etc.: Springer.
Taylor, J. R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tsohatzidis, S. 2007. “Searle’s Derivation of Promissory Obligation.” In Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology, edited by S. Tsohatzidis. Dordrecht: Springer.
von Wright, G. H. 1985. “Is and Ought.” In Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life, edited by E. Bulygin, J.-L. Gardies, and I. Niiniluoto I. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Walde, A. 1910. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heildeberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.
Weber, M. (1917) 1985. “Der Sinn der “Wertfreiheit” der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften.” In M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, edited by Johannes Winckelmann et al. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
———. (1917) 2012. “Der Sinn der “Wertfreiheit” der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften.” English translation “The Meaning of “Value Freedom” in the Sociological and Economic Sciences.” In M. Weber, Collected Methodological Writings, edited by H. H. Bruun and S. Whimster. London and New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Paolo Di Lucia and Filippo Valente for their comments on an earlier version of this chapter. Any errors are mine alone.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fittipaldi, E. (2021). On Searle’s Derivation and Its Relation to Constitutive Rules: A Social Scientist’s Perspective. In: Di Lucia, P., Fittipaldi, E. (eds) Revisiting Searle on Deriving "Ought" from "Is". Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54116-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54116-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54115-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54116-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)