Abstract
Ultrasound practice accreditation is both a challenge and a benefit to urology practices that perform ultrasound examinations to help diagnose their patients’ complaints, determine or guide the appropriate care, and monitor their progress.
In applying for accreditation, a practice must demonstrate the qualifications of the physicians and non-physicians who perform and/or interpret sonograms, document ultrasound equipment maintenance and calibration, set ultrasound examination protocols, and enact policies and procedures to ensure the safety of patients and personnel. Case studies and reports must be submitted to demonstrate the completeness and technical quality of the examinations and the content and timeliness of the reports.
Studies suggest that accreditation may improve the completeness and technical quality of ultrasound examinations and the diagnostic accuracy of their reports.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Miller DL. Safety assurance in obstetrical ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2008;29(2):156–64.
Nelson TR, Fowlkes JB, Abramowicz JS, Church CC. Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sonologist. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:139–50.
Houston LE, Odibo AO, Macones GA. The safety of obstetrical ultrasound: a review. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:1204–12.
Filly RA, Crane JP. Routine obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:713–8.
Merritt CRB. Ultrasound safety: what are the issues? Radiology. 1989;173:304–6.
ACR-SPR-SRU practice guideline for performing and interpreting diagnostic ultrasound examinations. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PGTS/guidelines/US_Performing_Interpreting.pdf.
AIUM training guidelines for physicians who evaluate and interpret ultrasound examinations. http://aium.org/resources/viewStatement.aspx?id=14.
AIUM training guidelines for the performance of ultrasound in the practice of urology. http://aium.org/resources/viewStatement.aspx?id=44.
ACR history and mission. http://www.acr.org/About-Us.
Kurtz AB. The AIUM celebrates 50 years of excellence. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(6):545–8. Abuhamad AZ, Benacerraf BR, Woletz P, et al. The Accreditation of Ultrasound Practices: Impact on compliance with minimum performance guidelines. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:1023–1029.
Abuhamad AZ, Benacerraf BR, Woletz P, et al. The accreditation of ultrasound practices: impact on compliance with minimum performance guidleines. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23:1023–9.
Popescu BA, Stefanidis A, Nihoyannopoulos P, et al. Updated standards and processes for accreditation of echocardiographic laboratories from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Euro Heart J. 2014;15(7):717–27.
Tomory M. ACR ultrasound accreditation: how does that impact equipment maintenance? Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010;44(5):402–3.
AIUM Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Ultrasound Practices http://aium.org/resources/viewStatement.aspx?id=26.
AIUM practice guideline for documentation of an ultrasound examination http://aium.org/resources/guidelines/documentation.pdf.
AIUM guidelines for cleaning and preparing endocavitary ultrasound transducers between patients http://aium.org/resources/viewStatement.aspx?id=27.
Accreditation fee calculator http://aium.org/accreditation/fees.pdf.
Accreditation agreement http://aium.org/accreditation/agreement.pdf.
Accreditation application checklist http://aium.org/accreditation/checklist.pdf.
Case study submission requirements http://aium.org/accreditation/caseStudyRequirements/urologic.pdf.
Longo D, Hewett J, Ge B, et al. Hospital patient safety: characteristics of best-performing hospitals. J Healthcare Manage. 2007;52:188–204.
Brown OW, Bendick PJ, Bove PG, et al. Reliability of extracranial carotid artery duplex ultrasound scanning: value of vascular laboratory accreditation. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39:366–71.
Popowski T, Huchon C, Fathallah K, et al. Impact of accreditation training for residents on sonographic quality in gynecologic emergencies. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(5):829–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Training Guidelines for Physicians Who Evaluate and Interpret Urologic Ultrasound Examinations
The following is extracted from the AIUM Training guidelines approved October 31, 2015.The current training guidelines can be found at http://www.aium.org/officialStatements/53. (Reproduced with permission of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.).
Physicians who perform and/or interpret diagnostic ultrasound examinations in the practice of urology should be licensed medical practitioners who have a thorough understanding of the indications and guidelines for genitourinary ultrasound examinations as well as a familiarity with the basic physical principles and limitations of the technology of ultrasound imaging. They should be familiar with alternative and complementary imaging and diagnostic procedures and should be capable of correlating the results of these other procedures with the ultrasound findings. They should have an understanding of ultrasound technology and instrumentation, ultrasound power output, equipment calibration, and safety. Physicians responsible for diagnostic genitourinary ultrasound examinations should be able to demonstrate familiarity with the anatomic, physiologic, and pathophysiologic characteristics of the anatomic areas that are being examined. These physicians should provide evidence of the training and competence needed to perform and/or interpret diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations successfully. The training should include methods of documentation and reporting of ultrasound studies.
Physicians Performing and/or Interpreting Diagnostic Urologic Examinations Should Meet at Least 1 of the Following Criteria
-
1.
Completion of an accredited urologic residency that includes training in ultrasound since July 1, 2009 (the year reporting of ultrasound examinations was required by the residency review committee), and is board certified by the American Board of Urology or is board eligible. If completion of certification occurred more than 36 months ago, maintenance of competence must be demonstrated, such as 50 diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations per year and a total of 10 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ within the previous 36 months.*
-
2.
Board certification in urology before July 1, 2009, and submission of an attestation of experience including involvement with 100** diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations and training in urologic ultrasound that includes at least a minimum of 12 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™; or level 2 course(s) verifying that the individual has satisfactorily met all specified learning objectives for the level 2 classification course(s) including hands-on demonstration of successfully performing and documenting ultrasound studies. Continuing medical education courses must be approved by the American Urological Association Office of Education or AIUM and include both didactic and hands-on ultrasound. If the level 2 course was completed more than 36 months ago, maintenance of competence must be demonstrated, such as 50 diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations per year and a total of 10 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ within the previous 36 months.*
-
3.
Completion of an accredited residency program and/or fellowship or postgraduate training (other than in urology) that includes structured training in diagnostic urologic ultrasound, under the supervision of a qualified physician(s),*** during which the trainee will have evidence of being involved with the performance, evaluation, interpretation, and reporting of at least 100** diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations.
If completion of a residency and/or fellowship program occurred more than 36Â months ago:
-
a.
The supervision and/or performance, interpretation, and reporting of at least 100** diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations in the previous 36Â months must be demonstrated; and
-
b.
Fifteen AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ dedicated to diagnostic urologic ultrasound must be documented within the previous 36 months.*
-
a.
-
4.
For completion of an accredited residency program and/or fellowship (other than in urology) in which the physician did not receive the required structured training in diagnostic urologic ultrasound, acceptable clinical experience can be documented by demonstrating:
-
a.
Evidence of being involved with the performance, evaluation, interpretation, and reporting of at least 100** diagnostic urologic ultrasound examinations within the previous 36Â months. It is expected that in most circumstances, examinations will be under the supervision of a qualified physician(s)***; and
-
b.
Evidence of 30 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ dedicated to diagnostic urologic ultrasound within the previous 36 months.*
-
a.
Maintenance of Competence in Urologic Ultrasound
All physicians performing urologic ultrasound examinations should demonstrate evidence of continuing competence in the interpretation and reporting of those examinations. A minimum of 50 diagnostic genitourinary ultrasound examinations per year is recommended to maintain the physician’s skills.
Continuing Medical Education in Urologic Ultrasound
The physician should complete 10 hours of AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ specific to urologic ultrasound every 3 years.
Developed in Collaboration with the Following Organization
American Urological Association
*If the physician interprets in multiple specialties, a representative sample of specialties totaling at least 30 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™ dedicated to ultrasound is acceptable.
**One hundred cases were selected as a minimum number needed to gain experience and proficiency with sonography as a diagnostic modality. This is necessary to develop technical skills, to appreciate the practical applications of basic physics as it affects image quality and artifact formation, and to acquire an experience base for understanding the range of normal and recognizing deviations from normal.
***A qualified physician is one who, at minimum, meets the criteria defined above in this document.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kozel, Z., Gupta, N., Gilbert, B.R. (2021). Urology Ultrasound Practice Accreditation. In: Fulgham, P.F., Gilbert, B.R. (eds) Practical Urological Ultrasound. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52309-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52309-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52308-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52309-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)