Skip to main content

A Framework for Selection of the Best Food Waste Management Alternative by a Spherical Fuzzy AHP Based Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions (INFUS 2020)

Abstract

In today’s sustainable business environment, managers and researchers have been attached high importance on food waste management. Especially for developing countries, the readiness level is comparatively low belongs to policies and low consciousness. That forces all stakeholders in the food waste supply chain benefit from some methods that can be beneficial for improving their decision-making skills. Because this decision needs to handle multi-faceted dimensions simultaneously under linguistic and uncertain environment, a fuzzy based multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach-based methodology is proposed in this study. As a novel fuzzy approach, spherical fuzzy sets (SFS) are utilized to select the best alternative. In the proposed model, SFSs are combined with a traditional MCDM approach, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with a name of Spherical Fuzzy AHP. A numerical example is conducted in order to indicate how the model can be used for food waste management. By the help of the proposed model, it is aimed to create a supportive tool for decision makers in the related institutions such as municipalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. FAO: Global food losses and food waste – Extent, causes and prevention (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S EPA: Food Recovery Hierarchy. Retrieved from United States Environmental Protection Agency (2013).https://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/food-recovery-hierarchy

  3. Balaban, Y., Birdoğan, B.: Analitik Ağ Süreci Yaklaşımıyla En Uygun Katı Atık Bertaraf Sisteminin Belirlenmesi: Trabzon İli Örneği. Atatürk Üniversitesi, pp. 183–194 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Velasquez, M., Hester, P.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10(2), 56–66 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hung, M.L., Ma, H.W., Yang, W.F.: A novel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag. 27(2), 209–219 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernard, A., Jansen, J.: A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste – a Swedish full-scale case study. Waste Manag. 31(8), 1879–1896 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bababola, M.: A multi-criteria decision analysis of waste treatment options for food and biodegradable waste management in Japan. Environments 2(4), 471–488 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Erceg, O., Margeta, J.: Selection of Food Waste Management Optıon by Promethee Method (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coban, A., Ertis, İ., Cavdaroglu, N.: Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making. J. Clean. Prod. 180, 159–167 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mourmouris, J.C.: MCDM for location and evaluation of waste disposal facilities in metropolitan areas: the case of East Africa. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manage. 6(1–2), 180–192 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellen Macarthur Foundation.: Towards the circular economy, vol. 2: opportunities for the consumer goods sector (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, A., Samadder, S.: Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: a review. Energy 197, 117253 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Fadel, M., Findikakis, A., Leckie, J.: Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling. J. Environ. Manage. 50(1), 1–25 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leal, F., Kovaleva, M.: Methods of food waste reduction. In: Food Waste and Sustainable Food Waste Management in the Baltic Sea Region, pp. 51–80. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arıkan, E., Simsit, Z., Vayvay, O.: Solid waste disposal methodology selection using MCDM methods and an application in Turkey. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 403–412 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kutlu Gundogdu, F., Kahraman, C.: A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft. Comput. 24, 4607–4621 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysu Melis Buyuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Buyuk, A.M., Temur, G.T. (2021). A Framework for Selection of the Best Food Waste Management Alternative by a Spherical Fuzzy AHP Based Approach. In: Kahraman, C., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I., Cebi, S., Tolga, A. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions. INFUS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1197. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics