Skip to main content

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making on Risk Assessment and Control Efficiency of Accounting Information Systems with TOPSIS

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions (INFUS 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1197))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2408 Accesses

Abstract

Accounting information systems (AIS) play a key role in risk assessment and control in modern enterprise management. Risk management is the process of planning, organizing, managing and controlling the necessary activities to control unexpected losses that may occur in the enterprises. The importance of risk assessment and control requires to use advanced fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making techniques. The aim of this paper is to apply the Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method to evaluate the risk assessment and control efficiency of AIS of firms in three different sector: production, trade and service sectors. The risk factors are determined as financial risks, legal risks, reputation risks, strategic risks, operational risks and external risks. The prioritization of risks has been made by academic experts and evaluation of organizations’ AIS has been made by risk-oriented audit professionals. As a result, the ranking of firms according to their ability of coping with the risks in their AIS is obtained as production firm, service firm and trade firm respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mizrahi, R.: Accounting and business information systems in SMEs. In: Çelik, Ş. (ed.) SMEs in Turkey Managerial Perspective IBSA. Studies in Management and Innovation, vol. 5, pp. 118–138. Kellner Publishing House, Bremen (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolturk, E., Gülbay, M., Kahraman, C.: Location selection by intuitionistic fuzzy and neutrosophic aggregation operators. In: Kahraman, C., Çebi, S., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B., Tolga, A.Ç., Sarı, İ.U. (eds.) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making, pp. 527–536. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Torun, H., Gördebil, M.: Multi criteria decision making based on TOPSIS method with extended fuzzy sets. In: Kahraman, C., Çebi, S., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B., Tolga, A.Ç., Sarı, İ.U. (eds.) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making, pp. 558–566. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Yalçın, A.S., Kiliç, H.S., Guler, E.: Research and development project selection via IF-DEMATEL and IF-TOPSIS. In: Kahraman, C., Çebi, S., Onar, S.Ç., Öztayşi, B., Tolga, A.Ç., Sarı, İ.U. (eds.) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making, pp. 625–633. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Usul, H., Mizrahi, R.: Risk Odaklı Denetim. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, E.M.: The Seven Step Process to Risk Based Auditing, vol. 2, no. 4 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emhan, A.: Risk Yönetim Süreci ve Risk Yönetmekte Kullanılan Teknikler, Atatürk U. IIBF, vol. 23, no. 3 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 375. pp. 298–486 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang, C.L., Young, J.L., Ting, Y.L.: A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput. Oper. Res. 20(8), 889–899 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, Z.: Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(6), 1179–1187 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114, 505–518 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to deep gratitude to academic experts as also to Accountant Professionals for their contributions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aygülen Kayahan Karakul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karakul, A.K., Mizrahi, R., Tektaş, B. (2021). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making on Risk Assessment and Control Efficiency of Accounting Information Systems with TOPSIS. In: Kahraman, C., Cevik Onar, S., Oztaysi, B., Sari, I., Cebi, S., Tolga, A. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques: Smart and Innovative Solutions. INFUS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1197. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_158

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics