Skip to main content

CIAM: A New Assessment Model to Measure Culture’s Influence on Websites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Health, Learning, Communication, and Creativity (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12193))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Literature has reported user’s culture to be an influencing factor towards the user experience of a website and hence it contributes to its rejection or uptake. It has also been reported that different cultures exhibit specific user interface preferences. However, there has been limited work to develop operational models that can assess the cultural inclination of a website design, which contributes to its user experience. This paper proposes an assessment tool called CIAM (Culture’s Influence Assessment Model) through deriving observable user interface elements and mapping them to prevalent culture models. The proposed markers of culture’s influence on a website were derived by a creative extension of reported work in literature and then was applied on 16 websites of 8 countries by 5 industry experts. It was found that the CIAM based assessment of websites was congruent with cultural dimensions of the 8 countries. In view of these findings, this paper argues that CIAM can be a useful tool when cultural disposition of a website needs to be assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cyr, D., Bonanni, C., Bowes, J., Ilsever, J.: Beyond trust. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 13, 25–54 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marcus, A.: Culture class versus culture clash. In: HCI and User-Experience Design. HCIS. Springer, London (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6744-0_2

  3. Rau, P.L.P. (ed.): CCD 2015. LNCS, vol. 9181. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20934-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Corbitt, B., Thanasankit, T.: A model for culturally informed web interfaces. Internet Management Issues (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith-Jackson, T.L., Resnick, M.L., Johnson, K.T.: Cultural Ergonomics: Theory, Methods, and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fogg, B.J., Fogg, G.E.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cash, P.J., Hartlev, C.G., Durazo, C.B.: Behavioural design: a process for integrating behaviour change and design. Des. Stud. 48, 96–128 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khaled, R., Barr, P., Fischer, R., Noble, J., Biddle, R.: Factoring culture into the design of a persuasive game. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments - OZCHI 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sato, G.Y., Barthes, J.-P., Chen, K.-J.: Following the evolution of distributed communities of practice. In: 2008 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fletcher, R., Melewar, T.C.: The complexities of communicating to customers in emerging markets. J. Commun. Manag. 6, 9–23 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Singh, N., Matsuo, H.: Measuring cultural adaptation on the web: a content analytic study of U.S. and Japanese web sites. J. Bus. Res. 57, 864–872 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reinecke, K., Bernstein, A.: Tell me where you’ve lived, and i’ll tell you what you like: adapting interfaces to cultural preferences. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 185–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcus, A.: Cross-cultural user-experience design for work, home, play, and on the way. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Courses on - SA 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 1260–1275 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nisbett, R.E.: Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count. W. W. Norton & Company, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen, A.B., Varnum, M.E.: Beyond east vs. west: social class, region, and religion as forms of culture. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 8, 5–9 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baack, D.W., Singh, N.: Culture and web communications. J. Bus. Res. 60, 181–188 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garrett, J.J.: Elements of User Experience, the: User-Centered Design for the Web and Beyond. Pearson Education, Pearson Education (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joshi, A., Medh, P.: Heuristic evaluation of e-learning products extended garrett’s model of user experience. J. Creat. Commun. 1, 91–104 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, X., Wang, C.: Research on designing the official websites of trade shows based on user experience. J. Conv. Event Tour. 17, 234–246 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fletcher, R.: The impact of culture on web site content, design, and structure. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. 10, 259–273 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, H., Sun, X., Zhang, K.: Culture-centered design: cultural factors in interface usability and usability tests. In: Eighth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD 2007) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nisbett, R.E., Nisbett, R.E., Norenzayan, A.: Culture and Cognition. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Masuda, T., Gonzalez, R., Kwan, L., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34(9), 1260–1275 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208320555

  25. Solomon, R.C., Deutsch, E.: Culture and modernity: east-west perspectives. Philos. East West 43, 565 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Oliveira, S., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture changes how we think about thinking: from “human inference” to “geography of thought”. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 782–790 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Johnston, V., Black, M., Wallace, J., Mulvenna, M., Bond, R.: A framework for the development of a dynamic adaptive intelligent user interface to enhance the user experience. In: Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics - ECCE 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hofstede, G.H., Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marcus, A., Baumgartner, V.-J.: A practical set of culture dimensions for global user-interface development. In: Masoodian, M., Jones, S., Rogers, B. (eds.) APCHI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3101, pp. 252–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27795-8_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. McSweeney, B.: Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith - a failure of analysis. Hum. Relat. 55, 89–118 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Myers, M.D., Tan, F.B.: Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 10, 24–32 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Singh, N., Zhao, H., Hu, X.: Cultural adaptation on the web: a study of American companies' domestic and Chinese websites. J. Global Inf. Manage. (JGIM) 11(3), 63–80 (2003). https://doi.org/10.4018/jgim.2003070104

  33. Reinecke, K., Minder, P., Bernstein, A.: MOCCA - a system that learns and recommends visual preferences based on cultural similarity. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces - IUI 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Marcus, A., Gould, E.W.: Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global web user-interface design. Interactions 7, 32–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hall, E.T.: Beyond culture. Anchor (1977). https://books.google.com/books/about/Beyond_culture.html?hl=&id=8EhKtQEACAAJ

  36. Lipman, A., Hall, E.T.: The hidden dimension. Br. J. Soc. 21, 353 (1970). https://doi.org/10.2307/589150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hall, E.T.: The Silent Language (1969). https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Silent_Language.html?hl=&id=a_2QvgAACAAJ

  38. Fink, D., Laupase, R.: Perceptions of web site design characteristics: a Malaysian/Australian comparison. Internet Res. 10, 44–55 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Goyal, N., Miner, W., Nawathe, N.: Cultural differences across governmental website design. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intercultural Collaboration - ICIC 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Usunier, J.-C., Roulin, N., Ivens, B.S.: Cultural, national, and industry-level differences in B2B web site design and content. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 14, 41–88 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cho, C.-H., Cheon, H.J.: Cross-cultural comparisons of interactivity on corporate web sites: the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and South Korea. J. Advert. 34, 99–115 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Chun, W., Singh, N., Sobh, R., Benmamoun, M.: A comparative analysis of Arab and U.S. cultural values on the web. J. Glob. Mark. 28, 99–112 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wurtz, E.: Intercultural communication on web sites: a cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 11, 274–299 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nisbett, R.E.: The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently - and Why. Hachette, UK (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Harris, D. (ed.): EPCE 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10276. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58475-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R.E., Masuda, T.: Culture and the physical environment: holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychol. Sci. 17(2), 113–119 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673

  47. Nisbett, R.E., Miyamoto, Y.: The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 467–473 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ji, L.J., Peng, K., Nisbett, R.E.: Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78, 943–955 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., Larsen, J.T.: Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look. Psychol. Sci. 14, 201–206 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Boduroglu, A., Shah, P., Nisbett, R.E.: Cultural differences in allocation of attention in visual information processing. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 40, 349–360 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kassarjian, H.H.: Content analysis in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 4, 8 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cho, B., Kwon, U., Gentry, J.W., Jun, S., Kropp, F.: Cultural values reflected in theme and execution: a comparative study of U.S. and Korean television commercials. J. Advert. 28, 59–73 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Chan, K., Cheng, H.: One country, two systems: cultural values reflected in Chinese and Hong Kong television commercials. Int. Commun. Gaz. 64, 385–400 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lin, C.A.: Cultural values reflected in Chinese and American television advertising. J. Advert. 30, 83–94 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nielsen, J., Tahir, M.: Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. Turtleback, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Okonkwo, U.: Sustaining the luxury brand on the Internet. J. Brand Manag. 16, 302–310 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brinck, T., Gergle, D., Wood, S.D.: Designing Web Sites that Work: Usability for the Web. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson, P.H.: Defining military culture. J. Mil. Hist. 72, 11–41 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hall, E.T., Hall, M.R.: Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans. French and Americans. Nicholas Brealey, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Moura, F.T., Singh, N., Chun, W.: The influence of culture in website design and users’ perceptions: three systematic reviews. J. Electron. Commer. Res. 17(4), 312–339 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ahmed, T., Mouratidis, H., Preston, D.: Website design guidelines: high power distance and high context culture. Int. J. Cyber Soc. Educ. 2(1), 47–60 (2009). ATISR. Retrieved January 27, 2020

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surbhi Pratap .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pratap, S., Kumar, J. (2020). CIAM: A New Assessment Model to Measure Culture’s Influence on Websites. In: Rau, PL. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Health, Learning, Communication, and Creativity. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49913-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49913-6_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49912-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49913-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics